Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I am new to the forum.  I have recently experienced the infamous stuck lifter on cylinder 6.  It sounded like a bolt was rattling around in the engine.  After doing some research, we proceeded to take the valve cover off to validate the rocker arm did not move after cranking the truck that would further indicate a stuck/collapsed lifter.  I ordered all the parts to do the lifter replacement for all 4 AFM lifters on the passenger side since we had to take the head off.  When we removed everything, the lifter roller didnt seem to scored up and we rolled the camshaft to see if there was any damage but it didnt seem super concerning.  I could not tell there was anything wrong with the lifter when i removed it based on trying to compress it and it did not physically come apart.  I could put the lifter in the old lifter guide and spin it, where as the new lifter guide had grooves that held the lifter in place (not sure what would cause it to seize up and strip the notches on the lifter guide.)  When replaced all 4 AFM lifters, new valve guides, head gasket, intake gasket, exhaust manifold gasket, new head bolts and new exhaust manifold bolts (old ones were crap.)  The truck fired up and ran really well for about 50 miles or so and the same thing has occurred.  I have pulled the valve cover(haven't pull the head or anything yet) to make sure its sticking again.  My question is, what may cause the same lifter to fail that quickly?  and should i just go ahead and do the AFM/DOD delete, would that solve my problem?  I was thinking of going with this kit.

 

https://www.amsracing.net/collections/gm-afm-dod-kits/products/complete-active-fuel-management-afm-dod-delete-kit-w-handheld-for-2010-2014-gm-chevrolet-6-2l-l94-engines-8th-digit-vin-f

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Edited by Erick C.
  • Erick C. changed the title to 2013 GMC Yukon Denail 6.2L Stuck Lifter
Posted

Just do the delete kit and get it over with. I've never heard of AMS racing so I can't say (or if I have I've forgotten about it) TXSpeed has good kits for sure. 

 

Sounds like someone messed up the install though or there is a bigger issue. Theoretically it could happen though yes

Posted

Thanks, its the same exact sound as it was before.  

 

I was debating replacing that one lifter again on the possibility that it just may be another bad lifter.  I attached a picture of what i could see of the camshaft of cylinder 6 where the AFM lifters go (not sure if you want see what i saw but it doesn't look bad)  The left side there was no issues, the right side is where the lifter failed. 

 

If i do replace the lifter only and buy the AFM/DOD bypass that goes into the OBDII port, could it keep that lifter from going bad or would i be better off just doing the AFM/DOD delete?  Sorry for all the questions, i just want to make sure i explore all my options.  Just trying to prepare for if i have remove one head like before or if im gonna have to pull both heads and then pull the motor out to replace the camshaft for the AFM/DOD delete.  Thanks for the advice.

 

 

Screenshot_20211020-095402_Gallery (1).jpg

Posted

You can't delete only the lifters you have to delete the camshaft too. 

 

I would go ahead and get a custom tune to remove the system from the truck. I am sure it would be okay with the range device delete but I would look at the custom tune to be 100% certain. 

 

 

Why are you pulling the engine out to replace the camshaft? You can easily do that in the truck.

  • Like 1
Posted

Send the ecu in to get the AFM delete done or use a Range etc..........

it is easy enough to modify the intake etc so that oil cannot stop flowing to any lifters, I did this fix on my 2013 5.3 in just a few hours, not counting downtime for the ecu to be returned to me.

I can link the entire repair and where I had ecu done if you wish LMK.

Posted

Yea, looking at it again and watching a few videos I see you can remove the radiator and radiator fan and have plenty of room to remove the camshaft.

 

I've decided to do the AFM dod delete.  I've taken the intake, coil packs, valve covers, plug and wires out today.  I'm gonna work on the heads, water pump, radiator, radiator fan and all the timing stuff over the next few days while I wait on the parts to come in.

 

I'm gonna order the kit with the Diablo programmer so I can reprogram it when I'm done.  

 

My intent is to fix this and keep it til the wheels fall off so I'm really hoping this completely fixes the issue.  My father in law had a 2000 suburban that had 250k miles on it before he got rid of it so I thought I was getting a beast of a vehicle.. turns out that started to torch the brand with these AFM lifters.

  • Like 1
Posted

Im still in the middle of tearing this thing apart (Working on it like 2 hours a day) and i was just curious, will i need to take the A/C Condenser out to slide the camshaft out or should their be enough room when i pull the radiator and radiator fan?  

 

 

Posted

Update, we got the old camshaft out and one of the lobes was chewed up.  We got everything tore apart and the new camshaft put in, put the timing chain cover on and the harmonic balance back end and we realized we took the oil pump bolts out and did not put them back.   So now we have to pop the harmonic balance and timing cover back off to put those bolts back in.

 

Question - we were in the process of torquing down the balancer bolt when we had to back it out.  My question is, can I reuse it since we hadn't completely tightened it down yet?!

Posted

Mmm my gut says no go buy an ARP bolt.

 

You probably would maybe be okay since it wasn't completely down but TTY bolts are my least favorite.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/23/2021 at 7:41 PM, Erick C. said:

Question - we were in the process of torquing down the balancer bolt when we had to back it out.  My question is, can I reuse it since we hadn't completely tightened it down yet?!

Probably but why risk it?

 

Use only GM OE lifter trays, the Chicom knock offs destroy engines left and right, seemingly on purpose like their counterfeit spark plugs.

 

It is quite likely that the #6 AFM solenoid has failed in one way or another which caused the lifters to collapse and fail.  It is SOP to replace the VLOM anything the AFM system is repaired, same for the lifter trays.  I say this knowing the path you are on, it's for the next guy to come along.

Posted

We were able to slap everything back together and I reprogrammed the truck to remove the AFM/DOD.  Truck fired right up and runs great however now I have a lil leak.  

 

It drips right under the pulleys and looks like the main seal may be leaking and then there is a stream where it seems to run down the oil pan, I'm not sure if it's 2 leaks or 1.

 

We did not replace the oil pump, timing chain or chain tensioner.

 

I did loosen one of the oil pan bolts not paying attention when trying to remove a wire bracket under the bottom of the timing chain cover and front of the oil pan, then tighten it back.

 

Gaskets that were replaced:

Main crank seal

Timing cover gasket

Water pump gasket

new VLOM with new gasket

Head gaskets

Valve cover gaskets

Intake manifold gasket

Exhaust manifold gasket

 

I've read it is tough to get the main crank seal right and I'm not sure if ruined the oil pan gasket by loosening that one bolt.

 

I've been debating running blue devil oil stop leak through the system but I want to verify where the leak/leaks are coming from.

 

I included a picture from my floor from the past few days.  The few drops at the front seem like they're from the balancer area and the stream seems like it just runs down the oil pan and drops in random spots.

 

Again, thanks for the help so far

20211031_235029.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I swapped over the oil pressure sending unit to the new vlom.  Is it possible that it is causing the leak down the pain and to the middle of the truck?!

Posted
On 11/1/2021 at 11:18 PM, Erick C. said:

I swapped over the oil pressure sending unit to the new vlom.  Is it possible that it is causing the leak down the pain and to the middle of the truck?!

Possible.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...