Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Beastland said:

It means your dealer is waiting for allocation for your truck. They only get so many per week and every week its a different mix of trim and option constraints. They might get allocation for a lt trail boss but only with the 5.3l and so they put someone elses order into the system that week.

That makes sense. I’m just still confused why I was being told it was accepted but now it’s not. Wouldn’t they have had an allocation when it was initially accepted?

Posted
1 hour ago, Frey23 said:

That makes sense. I’m just still confused why I was being told it was accepted but now it’s not. Wouldn’t they have had an allocation when it was initially accepted?

You sure it was actually "accepted" (code 2000) previously? I'm not a dealer and not an expert in the process but I wouldn't think it would move in reverse.

Posted
On 2/22/2022 at 5:15 PM, goosehunter said:

Is there any one that has all wheels available on silverado 2022 refresh with there rpo codes???   Thanks!

 

 

Check out the order guide wheels section:

 

Chevy - Model Information - Online Ordering Guide (gmfleetorderguide.com)

 

GMC - Model Information - Online Ordering Guide (gmfleetorderguide.com)

 

If you then navigate to the "EXTERIOR" page in there, you can see the wheel RPO codes and the trims they are standard or optional on.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, UCF w00t said:

You sure it was actually "accepted" (code 2000) previously? I'm not a dealer and not an expert in the process but I wouldn't think it would move in reverse.

Positive. My dealer even called to tell me it had been accepted. These screenshots are 3 weeks apart from each other 

FF1DA4F1-5D65-46AB-AFD8-FE5517F3C12F.png

DBCFAC53-8623-4A68-BE42-DEA1DDD02314.png

Posted
37 minutes ago, Frey23 said:

Positive. My dealer even called to tell me it had been accepted. These screenshots are 3 weeks apart from each other 

FF1DA4F1-5D65-46AB-AFD8-FE5517F3C12F.png

DBCFAC53-8623-4A68-BE42-DEA1DDD02314.png

Very strange. I'd ask your dealer for an explanation. They can look up the order status history and send it to you. Will show all the status codes and dates it changed to each code. 

Posted (edited)

Placed an order with my dealer early January. Have a build date for the second week in March. 

 

Feel I've established a good working relationship with my dealer for an earlier purchase in 2021. There was no hesitation to get my custom truck ordered. Unfortunately those having problems are with dealerships trying to oversell their allocation and have you settle for something that just gets shipped from the factory. 

 

Unfortunately I was dragged through the coals trying to order my 2007 avalanche back in October 2006 like some of you guys are now. Best suggestion is to change dealerships ASAP. 

Edited by Ryan Tierney
Posted (edited)

So something that I find very concerning, with the online configurators up. I went over to gmfamilyfirst.com to build out the exact AT4X I have on order. And a huge alert stating "This trim is not eligble for the employee discount". And it is listed for every single trim package on the new Sierra 1500.  So, if they are really not allowing an employee discount on the new trucks, there will be alot of people upset, including myself. Will be interesting to see what happens. 

Edited by obrien19
Posted
23 minutes ago, obrien19 said:

So something that I find very concerning, with the online configurators up. I went over to gmfamilyfirst.com to build out the exact AT4X I have on order. And a huge alert stating "This trim is not eligble for the employee discount". And it is listed for every single trim package on the new Sierra 1500.  So, if they are really not allowing an employee discount on the new trucks, there will be alot of people upset, including myself. Will be interesting to see what happens. 


Same with Supplier Discount website. The Eligible vehicles page says that 2022 Silverado/Sierra 1500 is eligible, no mention of limited.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Dirk13 said:


Same with Supplier Discount website. The Eligible vehicles page says that 2022 Silverado/Sierra 1500 is eligible, no mention of limited.

Says that the 2022 Silverado/Sierra 1500 "is" or "isn't" eligble.   When I check the 1500 Limited, I'm seeing an average of 6K off for employee discount. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, obrien19 said:

Says that the 2022 Silverado/Sierra 1500 "is" or "isn't" eligble.   When I check the 1500 Limited, I'm seeing an average of 6K off for employee discount. 

It just says “Silverado” or “Sierra” under 2022. It doesn’t mention limited but we know that the limited is eligible.

 

All I’m saying is the eligible vehicles page doesn’t mention that the updated 22 doesn’t qualify. So either the build and price tool is wrong or the eligible vehicles page needs update.

Posted

GMC live chat just indicated that my 2022 refresh denali has been produced.  I got acceptance of my order back on Dec 27th.  Any ideas on how long it should take for delivery from this stage?  The chat indicated that shipping is the next step and I haven't heard back from the dealership yet on the status of my order.   

 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, obrien19 said:

So something that I find very concerning, with the online configurators up. I went over to gmfamilyfirst.com to build out the exact AT4X I have on order. And a huge alert stating "This trim is not eligble for the employee discount". And it is listed for every single trim package on the new Sierra 1500.  So, if they are really not allowing an employee discount on the new trucks, there will be alot of people upset, including myself. Will be interesting to see what happens. 


FYI, today I called the number for the supplier pricing program. I spoke to a nice, but clueless guy who basically just read off the same website I was looking at and said no discount. 
 

I called the dealer I’ve been working with and he looked into it. Told me the discount would be available on a refreshed 22 and wasn’t sure why the website listed that it wasn’t. 
 

Im going in next week to order a 22 HC, so we will see then how they determine the supplier price. 

Posted
On 2/26/2022 at 4:02 PM, rascal71 said:

Trail Boss Silver Ice Metallic STD bed 3.0 dmax

Ordered on 12/27

Order accepted two weeks later and given a build week of 2/21

The chat on Chevy's website as of yesterday said it still had this build week. Will check with my dealer Monday and see if it got built and report back.

 

Latest update is event code 3400 "broadcast" which means it didn't hit the TPW of 2/21. Don't know if it's because of constraints or just behind on production.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...