Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well I'm old school and checking oil on any motor is standard operating procedure in my book. So your logic makes no sense to me. Buy hey you roll the way you want. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
51 minutes ago, johnnyquick said:

obviously you should not need to unless you saw a leak on a newer vehicle like this.

I expect some smart comment but this is not 1978 and this truck should not be using this much oil, THAT is why NHTSB is investigating GM.

HOWEVER I will say that once you realize GM makes crappy A**ed engines that use oil like a 1947 Packard then you should start checking it..lol

Mine WAS drinking oil like crazy until I did a flush and switched my grade to 10-30 as opposed to 0-20w and use only HIGHER quality oil than the idiots at the dealer put in.

Buying another brand next time unless we get the Escalade V with the handbuilt ZR-1 engine.

Cheers

Who runs 0w20 in this truck? Yikes. It’s spec’ed for 5w30

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Pryme said:

Who runs 0w20 in this truck? Yikes. It’s spec’ed for 5w30

I will say I am confused by that statement as well but that got me wondering as per Lundimpacts potential oil consumption issue. More facts need to be known to really nail down if the engine is in fact using oil. There are various scenarios that could have hidden the issue until now or if the issue just happened recently to cause excess use of oil ( again if in fact its actually using oil )

 

Facts like were the prior oil changes since the vehicle was bought used, monitored for level right from the point the oil was changed and let sit for hours on a level surface ( preferably the same spot each time the oil was checked ) before checking and that the engine oil was at the full mark right after the oil change service was done. And then tracked along the way in periodic checks of the level.

 

Was it for certain that the correct oil viscosity was put into the engine on this last oil change and again was it confirmed to be full at the start of this last fresh oil change. A thinner viscosity oil accidentally used could make that difference or perhaps even a different brand of oil. Also who is to say it was at the full mark at the beginning of this oil change if it was not checked to confirm a shops work if it was a shop that performed the service.

 

Also going back to a prior oil change, its always possible it was over filled or driven differently at that time and it used less oil or had more oil in it to begin with and why it never triggered the low oil level warning.

 

In typing this out and thinking about it, its no wonder I prefer to do my own oil changes on equipment as then I know for sure what oil went into it and at what level it was at that point, and then checking it regularly on the same or level spot to know all the way through to the point of needing to do the next oil change, as to how much oil the engine is consuming. But basically my comments go back to the basics of what diyer2 said, making it a standard practice to check the oil level regularly rather than depending on a shop or make assumptions the oil level "should" not drop. Of course GM came out with the cover their butt statement about how this engine in their mind is acceptable to use a quart of oil every 1000 miles/ per 100 gallons of fuel as I imagine has been said a few times in this thread or the forum. Also a shop is not even going to know the oil level is dropping unless the vehicle owner says something as shops just drop the oil if that is what its coming in for and they have no idea where the level was before they did the oil change because the shop is only concerned about getting the service done as fast as possible. Of course it would be different only if a vehicle was on warranty and its a dealership going through the motions of changing the oil and keeping track of how much its consuming.

Edited by Chuck FB
  • Like 1
Posted

Yup I'm still here, watching and waiting. I keep meticulous records of maintenance and gas mileage and ONLY have oil consumption when towing. My travel trailer is not heavy but does catch the wind like a sail and makes this engine work. Still, even under a heavy load I didn't expect this but not much I can do at this point. Currently at 59,453 miles and no other major issues. Just towed my camper over the weekend at was getting 4mpg at 71MPH driving into the wind. Really sucks 😞

  • Like 3
Posted
21 minutes ago, Truston Gunter said:

Yup I'm still here, watching and waiting. I keep meticulous records of maintenance and gas mileage and ONLY have oil consumption when towing. My travel trailer is not heavy but does catch the wind like a sail and makes this engine work. Still, even under a heavy load I didn't expect this but not much I can do at this point. Currently at 59,453 miles and no other major issues. Just towed my camper over the weekend at was getting 4mpg at 71MPH driving into the wind. Really sucks 😞

I am curious as to what typical miles you put on an oil change interval as well as the brand ( and named type of oil and viscosity within the brand ) you are currently using. Put another way, if you have shortened the oil change distance and tried other brands of oil to see if they respond similarly with the oil use pattern ?. 

 

Also have you noticed if the oil use ramps up higher for a given distance in the second half of the miles accumulated within the oil change period. I know myself with various engines over the years in vehicles or equipment, the oil level would often maintain well for the first number of miles or hours in a sound engine and then it started to ramp up in usage and use a marked increase in oil in the later part of the time/distance the oil was in use. Basically like the oil and additive package was being used up and with that I speculated some oil sheering as well.

Posted

FWIW

My truck started burning oil at about a yr old, 25-30,000 mi. And yes it was about what the ridiculous GM spec says, 1 quart / 1000 mi.
 

Was always using cheap oil and filter. After reading you guys argue oil and then talking to my mechanic friend, started on M1 oil and filter, and reduced down to 4000 interval. Never burned oil again. 65,000 mi now.

  • Like 4
Posted

I have been running GM D1G3 labeled full syn since new and at 10,000 miles just got back from a 4000 mile trip with about 60% of those miles pulling a 5tth wheel and hauling 13000# 

I added about 8 ounces to top it off while arguably towards the top of the full mark. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Yes, my fault on lack of detail. 99k Saturday morning on the odo when message flashed. 

 

I change my own oil and keep detailed records. Last change was 7.5 qts out, 8 qts in. Kirkland 5w-30 full synthetic, Delco pf63 filter. No leaks anywhere. 

 

Was cold here and I probably spent more time idling in the last 2 months than I normally do, however nothing excessive or abnormal for a truck that is intended for use in a fleet/ work application. In January I towed 2 snowmobiles 500 miles round trip, which is something we could do with a car so not overworking the thing by any means. 

 

Taking a road trip from western wi to Fargo in a few weeks, going to change oil immediately before and monitor. Same at the end of April driving to Chicago (maybe it'll get stolen there and spare me the pain of more troubleshooting lol)

  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, Chuck FB said:

I am curious as to what typical miles you put on an oil change interval as well as the brand ( and named type of oil and viscosity within the brand ) you are currently using. Put another way, if you have shortened the oil change distance and tried other brands of oil to see if they respond similarly with the oil use pattern ?. 

 

Also have you noticed if the oil use ramps up higher for a given distance in the second half of the miles accumulated within the oil change period. I know myself with various engines over the years in vehicles or equipment, the oil level would often maintain well for the first number of miles or hours in a sound engine and then it started to ramp up in usage and use a marked increase in oil in the later part of the time/distance the oil was in use. Basically like the oil and additive package was being used up and with that I speculated some oil sheering as well.

I have always used Mobile 1 full synthetic and a mobile 1 filter. here is a screen shot of my maintenance log and fuel log for reference. 

fuel log.png

maintenance log.png

  • Like 2
Posted
30 minutes ago, Truston Gunter said:

I have always used Mobile 1 full synthetic and a mobile 1 filter. here is a screen shot of my maintenance log and fuel log for reference. 

fuel log.png

maintenance log.png

How often do you service the oiled air filter?  You show not ever servicing it. If its not oiled but changed or cleaned how often serviced? 

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, Truston Gunter said:

I have always used Mobile 1 full synthetic and a mobile 1 filter. here is a screen shot of my maintenance log and fuel log for reference. 

fuel log.png

maintenance log.png

That is excellent information and as I see customboss was also wondering about the servicing of the k&n filter, I used to run one in a truck of a dated vintage that had no air flow MAP or MAF sensor and still own the truck and I did service the filter regularly. However for a few reasons I came to the conclusion that it was probably in the "new" engines best interest not to run one and go back to the dry filter element and I took that nice pricey k&n and threw it in the garbage. Having said that I don't mean to shock you by that comment but I have my own reservations about the filter and I certainly won't be putting one into my new truck.

 

Ok so my own personal thoughts ( and no I am not a mechanic ), I'll put it this way with your truck with my line of thinking and lets hypothetically say that you sold me your truck and you had told me its history. Knowing that direct injection engines seem to be even more prone to fuel dilution issues, I would start out by using the same brand oil but change it at 3000 mile intervals and grab a sample of oil at that time to send off to see what the fuel dilution number looks like as well as whatever else it might tell me like sheered viscosity ( or if fuel dilution lowered it ) and so on. I would take the k&n and set that aside and put the factory dry filter in but also get at the MAF sensor and clean or replace it and clean out the filter oil if any within the intake tract ( although probably the factory box would go back in to fit a factory filter ). I would run some techron fuel injector cleaner through it at intervals to help clean the injectors to give the best spray pattern they are able to produce.

Posted
2 hours ago, lundimpact1775 said:

Yes, my fault on lack of detail. 99k Saturday morning on the odo when message flashed. 

 

I change my own oil and keep detailed records. Last change was 7.5 qts out, 8 qts in. Kirkland 5w-30 full synthetic, Delco pf63 filter. No leaks anywhere. 

 

Was cold here and I probably spent more time idling in the last 2 months than I normally do, however nothing excessive or abnormal for a truck that is intended for use in a fleet/ work application. In January I towed 2 snowmobiles 500 miles round trip, which is something we could do with a car so not overworking the thing by any means. 

 

Taking a road trip from western wi to Fargo in a few weeks, going to change oil immediately before and monitor. Same at the end of April driving to Chicago (maybe it'll get stolen there and spare me the pain of more troubleshooting lol)

As to the last point. lol. But criminals don’t like trucks that burn oil so you are probably good haha. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Apologies in advance, this is a long post, there's a lot to explain.   A friend had a 2010 Avalanche with a 5.3 (LMG) that blew the head gaskets (amount other problems). He gave me a donor motor out of a 2007 suburban (LC9). I got it all installed, and everything hooked up. Went to go start it, and it stumbled a bit at first and died a couple times, but after trying a few times it sounded like it was running very well. Went out to go get some coolant, and came back the next day.    Upon trying to start it, the truck will crank and fire normally and the RPMs will raise to around 1,200 or 1,500, sounding great, and then the RPMs will decrease and it will just die. Repeat that a dozen or two dozen times, and eventually it will fire and idle beautifully. As soon as you touch the throttle, it will start misfiring and sound like absolute trash. When you let off the throttle it will come down and hunt around shaking and misfiring like crazy. A message will come up on the dash saying reduced engine power.    It is throwing codes for a map sensor circuit voltage High, as well as MAF sensor low frequency. With key on engine off, the map sensor reads about 4.8 volts on the vout pin, which the PCM interprets as about 17.8 PSI, contrasted to the barometer which my scan tool tells me reads about 13.5 PSI. However, once the engine starts and is idling this reading drops to about 5-6 PSI at a stable idle, and varies significantly when the engine is misfiring/ hunting like I said before. I should note that I used the intake and MAP sensor from the LC9 engine. I changed the connector on the 2010 harness to The 2007 connector. The pinouts for the sensors were printed right on the top, and I triple-checked that I put the correct wire into the correct place.   On the other hand, the MAF sensor reads consistently 0.0 g/s regardless of State. I have pulled my hair out trying to figure out this last detail. I have tried three different sensors, (all of which should be good, one of which was new), I have verified all the wiring from the sensor going back to the PCM, and have verified that the readings at the PCM are the same readings as at the sensor itself. The intake air temperature sensor is also functioning as normal. I verified all the voltages and grounds etc, and everything is as it should be. I don't have an oscilloscope to verify, but I probed with my multimeter (Klein mm720) on frequency Mode, and it reads that on initial cranking, the maf is producing between 3000 and 7000 HZ, and as soon as the engine fires that falls off to below, 1000, and if the engine continues to run, it will produce somewhat erratic readings between 5 and 100-200 HZ. It does increase notably when the engine is revved despite the misfirings. As I said before, I have verified all of the wires going to the PCM, and I have tried multiple known good sensors. I've tested all the pins and voltages from the sensor and verified them against the manual that they are what they should be. I tested all the wiring for both ohms and voltage drop, and everything tested fine. Like I said I tested at the sensor as well as right at the PCM, everything checked out.   The only other thing of note at least I think is the fact that the engine originally in the truck had VVT, but the engine I put in, the lc9, does not have VVT. I modified the cam sensor plug to work. I reference the wiring diagrams and double-checked that I modified the harness correctly to adapt it. There is obviously a code for the VVT solenoid, but I don't think that's the cause of my problems, and this friend will probably have the PCM sent off to tune out the codes at some point.   I'm writing this for my bed so I don't recall the exact codes, but I'll update the post tomorrow morning with the exact codes. And ideas or feedback much appreciated. 
    • It's possible the two trucks are using different body control modules which is why yours works and the OP's doesn't.   So much in these newer vehicles depends on model/trim configurations, production date. They don't all use the same modules like back in the day.
    • I forgot to answer the question as per what market mine is set to and yes I finally found that area on mine and yes its also set to America.   So here's something I realized as I wasn't looking at that part in the Sierra section until now, your right that what I see here as choice 3 under Sierra which says 07/2023-06/2026 ( 433 MHz 13542523 ) it has no choice 5 for tire pressure selection. Where as it does under the Chev choice. However I kept going down the list within the Sierra and I am really wondering if choice 9 will work for your truck as it has the same model number and hertz sensor as my truck. I would say try that choice first, if that doesn't work then jump over to the Chev section and again choose that same model and hertz choice as for some reason the Chev section gives the choice 5 of tire type/pressure selection for going back a number of years. Could very well be an Autel thing that they just didn't get the updates all done properly under Sierra but anyway first try that selection 9 I suggested under Sierra and then go from there. 
    • Looking for this piece that holds the hose clamp in place. I have the hose clamp just not that other piece. Dealers and wrecking yards in my area will not sell just that piece. They want you to buy the whole air tube $100 +/- to get that $5 part.  that piece isn't molded to the air tube as I looked at my friends truck. It's held on by a screw and nut. I'm trying to put the OEM parts on the truck as the previous owner butchered things up installing an aftermarket CAI. It really looked homemade. 🤣 Thanks
    • Ok I missed that part that yours is a GM. The strange part is that the choice for year ranges and within the year of 2026 is different on the Sierra then on the Chev for some reason as I am looking at my tool at the Sierra choices. Now I am guessing you see as to your sensor part number as it may be different on your truck for some reason and a call to GM should get you the part model number of the sensors you should have as well as which MHz your sensors are. I know mine are the ones as per what I listed but there are other choices in the Autel and got me wondering if by some chance they put different ones in your truck. Having said that, did you try using each of the choices starting from No 1 and going on down the list, not sure if that would mean shutting off the engine each time and resetting the tool and going at it again each time. Also I thought of something else which may sound retarded but if there was some stupid chance that the chev choice would work. The reason I say that is that the Sierra is showing a range up to 06/2026 for the various choices of sensors it could be where as the Chev has one choice that has that 12/2026. By the way it is possible to not run the truck and you may know that as per not pressing the brake but pressing and holding the start button for a few seconds and it lights up the dash ( its called service mode ) but that sucks battery power and if it were me doing it that way I would be throwing on a decent sized battery charger before doing it that way as killing your battery won't make you happy at me at all !.    Like I say, just a thought to try the Chev choices if you have already exhausted the Sierra choices but first it would be nice to know for sure what exact sensor model and hertz your truck uses as I assume only those choices that mention the sensor would work unless a choice that does not mention the sensor model would somehow work. Its frustrating when one is trying to use tools like this without the experience of the tool and the vehicle, as I am sure dealer techs themselves struggle with it when starting out or a new model year comes along that is slightly different. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...