Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I’m so thankful to Leevon for posting this.  My original plan if I got a leak was to get the solid window.  Now I’m thinking I’ll find someone to do the repair properly as shown in this thread.  And, if I ever have the headliner or spoiler off for any other repair, I will make sure this is done.  So sad that it’s not done this well in the factory, especially since it’s a know issue.

 

Thanks to the forum admin for pinning it.

Edited by GN2018
  • Like 2
Posted

@Leevon thanks for the post! My truck started leaking last week and finally got around to doing it today. Perk of working in dealer is I could help do it so I also added strip caulk around all the bolts. Used the seam sealer GM recommended in the bulletin. My spoiler only had one seal on the 12 holes as well! Thanks again for all the tips! I thought about the camera/mirror upgrade as well but not wanting to spend $800+ right now! But now I know it isn't terrible to do!

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 2/8/2022 at 12:38 PM, luke1333 said:

@Leevon thanks for the post! My truck started leaking last week and finally got around to doing it today. Perk of working in dealer is I could help do it so I also added strip caulk around all the bolts. Used the seam sealer GM recommended in the bulletin. My spoiler only had one seal on the 12 holes as well! Thanks again for all the tips! I thought about the camera/mirror upgrade as well but not wanting to spend $800+ right now! But now I know it isn't terrible to do!

 Glad you got to put hands on it!  I think they're entirely 100% fixable and it's frustrating that the bulletins, and dealer practices don't line up.  

Posted
55 minutes ago, Leevon said:

 Glad you got to put hands on it!  I think they're entirely 100% fixable and it's frustrating that the bulletins, and dealer practices don't line up.  

Yeah mine was pouring after almost 2 years of ordering it, just started out of the blue. Resealed it all up, bolts etc etc and started to barely leak again. Going to put window in and camera mirror I guess this time around!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/17/2022 at 1:56 PM, newdude said:

 

 

I hope you got new nuts before you put it all back together.

 

They're only considered not reusable because they come with sealer on the washers, and it is basically destroyed when you remove them.  If you just put some sealer on them when you reinstall, you can reuse them just fine. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

How flowable is the seam sealer?  Could this be done without removing the spoiler and just masking well and running the bead through the gap between the spoiler and top of glass?  I noticed that 3M makes a clear flowable self leveling seam sealer…

Posted
On 4/3/2022 at 1:26 PM, hihosilverado said:

How flowable is the seam sealer?  Could this be done without removing the spoiler and just masking well and running the bead through the gap between the spoiler and top of glass?  I noticed that 3M makes a clear flowable self leveling seam sealer…

 

It's self-leveling which means it does have some flowability.  I think you might have success but it'd be a gamble...would be curious to see it tried.  

Posted

Yes you can do it without taking the spoiler off.  Just did it last week. 
 

Absolutely pouring rain now. We’ll see how it does. 

Posted
6 hours ago, AJMBLAZER said:

Yes you can do it without taking the spoiler off.  Just did it last week. 
 

Absolutely pouring rain now. We’ll see how it does. 

How did it do??  Which sealer did you use?

Posted

Well, so far so good.  Drove through absolutely pouring rain for 45 minutes on the highway this morning and then sat in the parking lot for 6 hours under rain ranging from a steady rain to a pouring downpour.  I can't see a sign of a leak now.

 

I used the Permatex sealant mentioned in another thread.  Worked great.  Might still go get a 3rd tube and put more on the window's top edge because I was a bit shocked at how much just sort of disappeared out of sight after I put it in there.  GM sure didn't use a lot of it's sealant and they definitely left a lot of void space for the water to sit.  Now I can see the sealant all the way across if I put my face up next to the spoiler and look down into the space between the glass and the cab.

Posted
15 hours ago, AJMBLAZER said:

Well, so far so good.  Drove through absolutely pouring rain for 45 minutes on the highway this morning and then sat in the parking lot for 6 hours under rain ranging from a steady rain to a pouring downpour.  I can't see a sign of a leak now.

 

I used the Permatex sealant mentioned in another thread.  Worked great.  Might still go get a 3rd tube and put more on the window's top edge because I was a bit shocked at how much just sort of disappeared out of sight after I put it in there.  GM sure didn't use a lot of it's sealant and they definitely left a lot of void space for the water to sit.  Now I can see the sealant all the way across if I put my face up next to the spoiler and look down into the space between the glass and the cab.

 Does your rear window still work?

Posted
On 4/6/2022 at 6:31 AM, AJMBLAZER said:

Yes you can do it without taking the spoiler off.  Just did it last week. 
 

Absolutely pouring rain now. We’ll see how it does. 

I ended up ordering the Kent clear seam sealer in the TSB and doing it yesterday.  I masked both sides of “the gap” and taped a sheet of plastic into the bed to catch drips.  I did soak the tube of seam sealer in hot water for a bit so it would flow better.
 

It rained like crazy today for several hours and no signs of any leak.  My truck is an early build 2021 and I had a tiny leak start around 14k miles.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 4/3/2022 at 2:26 PM, hihosilverado said:

How flowable is the seam sealer?  Could this be done without removing the spoiler and just masking well and running the bead through the gap between the spoiler and top of glass?  I noticed that 3M makes a clear flowable self leveling seam sealer…

It flows pretty well.  
The Kent Automotive Hi-Tech Clear that's in the GM bulletin also "self levels" a bit...it's not as runny as the 2 part seam sealer in this thread, but does a good job as well.  
It's true about the nuts not needing to be replaced.  Only reason they recommend it is because they have a sealant on them and it's basically destroyed when you tighten them...but it's INSIDE the cab, which isn't the ideal place for sealer to begin with. 
You want to seal the outside if you have the choice, which you do when you remove the spoiler. 

I cut, form and use 3M Ribbon Sealer on the outside, around all the holes.   It's butyl, and will last longer than you'll live.  There are other products that will work as well, but I use that frequently and always have it, and it's fantastic for the job. 

 

The key here is to make sure all the surfaces the sealer is going to touch are clean, clean, clean.  Especially that inside of the glass itself.  If the sealer doesn't adhere to the glass and it pulls away, you can have the leak again.     

 

 

Posted
On 4/12/2022 at 9:43 PM, hihosilverado said:

I ended up ordering the Kent clear seam sealer in the TSB and doing it yesterday.  I masked both sides of “the gap” and taped a sheet of plastic into the bed to catch drips.  I did soak the tube of seam sealer in hot water for a bit so it would flow better.
 

It rained like crazy today for several hours and no signs of any leak.  My truck is an early build 2021 and I had a tiny leak start around 14k miles.

 

 

Yes, if it's warm weather the Kent flows better.  If it's winter and I need it to flow more, I just start my truck, set it under the vent and blast the heater for a few minutes, and that does the trick.  

That works for most all sealers, btw.  I once saw a glass company on a lot that fabbed up a box that they stood sealer tubes in, and the ran lines from the engine coolant to it and literally had coolant pumping through the void outside the box, to keep their tubes of urethane warm so it flowed better.   Worked, too.   Flowed like butter. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...