Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are idle hours included in engine total hours?

I have total of 867.6 and Idle 123.2, does this make it 990.8 total engine hrs? or is the total 867.6 which include the idle hours?

5532D25A-B2E7-4E04-83DB-BD56BCD12756.jpeg

Posted

If you sit in the truck and let it idle for 6 minutes (0.1 hours) you'll know for sure.

 

I expect the total to include idling -- but haven't done the 6 minute thing while the hours page was displayed.

Posted

And just how do you get Idle Hours to display? 

 

I only see Hours. Doesn't list total or idle.

Posted

Total means ALL hours....

 

You have roughly 4,500 more mile on the engine than the odometer shows.

Posted
1 hour ago, willsep said:

In the DIC Information screen scroll down until you see Engine and Idle hours

It must be a Chevy or Denali thing. On a '21 1500 and a '22 3500 GMC's Denali screen, it just shows a engine icon and hours...

 

20220127_072821.thumb.jpg.906aca0cb83b9fca767042955c0ead83.jpg

Posted
7 hours ago, gemarsh said:

It must be a Chevy or Denali thing. On a '21 1500 and a '22 3500 GMC's Denali screen, it just shows a engine icon and hours...

 

20220127_072821.thumb.jpg.906aca0cb83b9fca767042955c0ead83.jpg

I don't have the Idle hours either... 21 Silverado RST

Posted

My is 2020 Sierra 1500 3.0 diesel. And just a quick question to elcamino, How did you figure 4500 extra miles? I am just curious, thanks.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, willsep said:

My is 2020 Sierra 1500 3.0 diesel. And just a quick question to elcamino, How did you figure 4500 extra miles? I am just curious, thanks.

Lots of machines get maintenance done based on hours -- even though miles is more common on road vehicles. 

 

Anyway, it's sometimes useful to compare the methods. 

 

 

Your truck has 32,264 miles.

Since both hourmeters are available, we know that driving time is  868 - 123 = 745 hours.

Avg miles per hour = 32264 / 745 = 43.3 mpg

 

If the idling time was at the same rate -- 43.3 x 123 = 5326 additional miles. 

 

el camino calculated using total hours, so used  32264 / 868 = 37 mph

37 miles/hour  x 123 hour = 4570 miles 

(and of course, if total is the only thing that is available -- then we use total mile / total time )

 

 

Of course, we all realize that there has to be some idling time (-warm-up, stop lights, etc etc) and that all driving is not at freeway speed. 

Leads us to what is the 'normal' average vehicle speed.  

For some reason I seem to think that typical average speed (base on total hours) is somewhere in the mid 30's.

 

If the total hours is the only thing that is available -- then then our only option is to compare the average speed with typical  average speeds for the same vehicle type.  Imperfect method, but can give a little insight into how it is being used.

 

The was a bulletin or info sheet or tech sheet gm put out that did give an average speed to use with the idling hours - to add to odo miles for service purposes.  It also said that for warranty odo mileage should still be used.

 

 

 

an example:

The forklift has 6500 hours -- how does that compare to my pickup?

6,500 hr x 37 mile/hr = 240,500 miles 

Edited by redwngr
Posted

Thanks redwngr, that was a great explanation, and I really appreciate your knowledge and time on the issue.

Posted
On 1/25/2022 at 4:14 PM, willsep said:

Are idle hours included in engine total hours?

I have total of 867.6 and Idle 123.2, does this make it 990.8 total engine hrs? or is the total 867.6 which include the idle hours?

 

 

 

Total is total.  Of the 867.6hrs, 123.2 of those has been idling.

 

GM's calculation (formula applies to gas and diesel):  The Diesel Exhaust System and DPF Soot Accumulation – TechLink (gm-techlink.com)

 

"Vehicle Idling

Some vehicles may spend a lot of time idling. Use the following steps to aid in determining the equivalent mileage (kilometers):

Record the total engine hours indicated on the DIC.

Multiply the engine hours by 33 miles or 53 km. This represents an average speed of 33 MPH or 53 KM/H.

The result should be close to or lower than the mileage on the odometer.

For example, if a vehicle has 1812.3 engine hours and 60,837 miles (97,908 km) on the odometer, the engine run time would equate to about 59,806 miles (96,052 km) (1812.3 X 33 = 59,806) (1812.3 X 53 = 96,052).

Since the calculated mileage is less than the actual mileage, the vehicle does not spend an excessive amount of time idling.

If the calculated mileage is more than the actual mileage, the vehicle would be considered a vehicle that idles a lot and this information may be useful in diagnosing any issues."

 

867.6hrs x 33mph = 28,630.8mi.  Per your odometer at 32264mi, Your truck has "traveled" 3,633.2mi more than the engine has physically been running.

 

If you applied this formula to your idle hours, 123.2hrs x 33mph, your engine has had 4065.6mi worth of idling on it, therefore 24,565.2mi of driving time, totaling 28630.8mi.

 

So you'd be a low idler.  

Posted

Thanks newdude, that’s really good information. I really appreciate all the knowledge from ya’ll.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I've tried everything and still have the rattle.  My next thing to eliminate is the seatbelt connection on the real pillar.  The cover seems loose and could be the source.  I found one of my grandsons video games in the back seat rest compartment   and had a glimmer of joy, but that wasn't it.  I'll keep trying.  
    • I'm tangentially aware of what Harley used to be, back in my riding days, although I was into Italian sport bikes. Ducati seems to have gone the other way; still very expensive, but they've made a large subset of their bikes a lot more reliable and accessible, and they've diversified their lineup to include other riding sports too. IMO, a good example of where greed and growth might have also been beneficial to the consumer.   Although GM is charging a relative premium for its most popular pickups, I find that there are some excellent value propositions in its lineup as well.   The Colorado still strikes me as the most attractive midsize on the market, and also the most reasonably priced given capability and features. There's a part of me that wishes I would have bought one instead of my Silverado.   The Equinox ...I must be getting old. The ICE equinox is a great design IMO. Probably because it reminds me visually of an actual SUV aka an S Blazer. Underneath it's nothing even remotely close, but it LOOKS good. It's got all the modern features plus some at a very reasonable price. If I had to run out and buy myself a daily commuter to do everything except tow, an Equinox would be on my list.   It does bug me that mid-tier 1500's reach into the 50-60k range, and Tahoes and Burbs are even more expensive. Less than 10 years ago, dealers were sitting on rows of Tahoe LS and LT's for low 40's. You could even still find Tahoes with a front bench, still!
    • Big oil is raking in billions from the Iran war. Can it avoid Trump’s fury?   Remember I said Big Oil is 'Vertically Integrated"?   Even as they no longer own the majority of the "Pump" they still own the "Well". Crude price upward pressure does not translate into that same pressure on production. Pumping cost remain unaffected and the gap is pure profit. Even after subtraction of a minor, comparatively, lower amount from supposed, but not always, realized refining volume. Consumers hate war, Big Oil, not so much.
    • We live in a world where the average person expects more. People say wages and our needs are farther apart. My first new home had 3 bedrooms and one bedroom. My first car and truck had what would be considered a stripped or work vehicle. In my neighborhood back then there were more homes like that and cars too. Middle managers and second home buyers worked their way up to the fancy houses and cars. Car loans were 3 years. GM had different models of cars for different income levels. The cars were pretty much the same size if you wanted a big vehicle. The nameplate designated the opulence. Chevy, Pontiac, Buick, Oldsmobile and Cadillac.  To be fair some of the cost is government mandated. We can’t blame them for giving us what people will pay for. Careful advertising steering people towards more profitable SUVs and trucks. As I learned recently a minivan is a cheaper more efficient form of transportation. Certainly easier to live with. Somebody realized the profit margin wasn’t as big and gave it a soccer mom label. So it lost its coolness. They’re making it the masses are buying it. You hit your hand with a hammer you can’t blame the hammer.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...