Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What style of fifthwheel are you guys using in your standard beds? I want to get a standard mount but want to see what you all are using first.

 

I'll also be using the factory puck system. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Adam9066
Posted

I am using a Reese GooseBox for my 5th wheel. It replaces the standard kingpin hitch on the trailer and all you have in the bed is a ball and 2 chain anchors. Smooth ride and a useable bed in seconds without having to remove big, bulky kingpin hitch.

  • Like 1
Posted

I went with the: 

B & W RVK3775 Companion OEM Slider 5th Wheel for 2020-2021 GM Puck System - 20,000 GTW

Had a truck hitch shop install it for me.

Posted

And... the dealer said I would not need a slider hitch due to the 5th wheel having the super turn front cap, but who knows what the future will hold.

IMG_1976.jpg

Posted

I also have the factory pucks.  I went with the Andersen Ultimate Hitch. 40lbs so it's easy to get in and out. It can give you an extra 9" of clearance (depending on how you're able to configure the hitch and adapter) from the cab if you're concerned about hitting on sharp turns. My trailer has a pretty flat front (unlike Michael621 above) and has plenty of clearance on even the sharpest turns. Although it's rated at 24k lbs and 4500lbs pin weight, I probably wouldn't have chosen it for a trailer that heavy. Mine is half that and it works great for me.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'll second adding a Reese Goose Box to you trailer and ditch the fifth wheel hitch.  With the factory ball mount about two inches behind the rear axle, and the extended reach of the Goose Box, you will end up with more cab to trailer clearance backing up with a sharp turn.  You can still run the trailer into the cab, but it helps.

  • Like 1
Posted

I also went with the Reese Goosebox for my 5th wheel. It's worked out great. You can just flip the ball over when it's not in use and flip it right back out when you need it. I tested out the turning radius at home with my trailer hooked up to the truck and found that all the angles my truck could turn I wouldn't hit the trailer. Real use may vary *out in the wild. I had to pull a sharp u-turn from a gas station with the trailer attached and my truck was in the street while the trailer was still higher the gas station driveway...I just barely dinged my trailer to the plastic piece that holds the bed-view camera and the 3rd brake light. Only a scratch on my truck and barely tiny scratch on the trailer...but still good to know that testing it out on flat ground doesn't always equate to fully safe :D

  • Like 1
Posted

B&W Companion RVK3710 with turning point pin box. This setup allows me to turn around at the top of my driveway, just have to fix the stones. I also like the turning point as it makes for faster(tighter) turns in the campground. 

Posted

I'm using a Pullrite Super glide slider hitch to pull a Grand Design Reflection 260RD. This has worked really well for us.

 

Posted

I am using a Curt A25 with the industry standard rails, and I have not had any issues, just need to be aware on tight turns. I know my setup is different than OP using the factory puck system, but as far as I have heard the factory puck system actually sits slightly rear of the rear axle. So OP, you would have more clearance to the cab, and should be good with a standard mount. 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I installed a Reese Goosebox as well.  I like it after the first tow from Oregon to California Via Highway 101 (rough, winding & rougher).  
In comparison to the previous setup (B&W Companion with slider hitch, Lippert Rota-Flex pin box, Dodge shortbed), I am very happy to make the change.

 

I'm pulling the trailer about 2-4 time per month, and need the bed at every stop.  So this seemed like the best alternative.  If I was only pulling once or twice a year, I'd opt for the B&W without the slider.  I really like how easy it the B&W is to hitch, and how connected the trailer felt when towing.

My thoughts on the differences and towing experience, so far:

 

Pro's over my previous B&W/Rota-Flex setup:

* Removing the Companion slider was a heavy bugger. I did not enjoy removing/installing. Especially since I was doing it by myself.

* Small foot print in the front allows a bigger chest at the front of the bed.

* Seems like the airbag in the Goosebox is less jarring on the trailer.

* Looks expensive (great for bragging rights with the "neighbors"... lol)

 

* Was able to get about 6-1/2" of bed to 5th wheel clearance with a pretty level trailer.

 

Cons:

*Lining up is a learning experience.  I'm going to make a magnetic sighting system I can see looking out the back window to make connecting easier.  Something I can toss in the bed box.  I'm not competent enough to use the bed camera to get latitudinal alignment yet.  I'm using the trailer camera, set on the wheel well to get longitudinal alignment, and that works well.

* Less room down the side of the bed for chests and stuff, because of the size of the Goosebox structure when making turns.

* The ride feels a bit disconnected, especially on rough roads through the turns.  Feels like the trailer wallows in comparison to the 5th wheel connection.

* Goosebox sits a lot lower than a standard 5th wheel pin box.  So when the 5th wheel is level, I can't back under the Goosebox (it is lower than the bed).  At short narrow camp spots, that can leave the truck hanging into the road.

* inflating the air bag, and connecting the chains/safety brake would be more difficult without the Mult-Flex tailgate.  Really glad I ordered that on the truck.

* Goosebox sticks out quite a bit further in front of the trailer than the Rota-Flex 5th wheel pinbox.  Since I can't back under the trailer when the site is level, that's a bit more difficult to park the truck.

 

 

Pinbox-Support.jpg

Truck-&-Trailer-Hooked-Up.jpg

Goosebox-below-bed-height.jpg

  • Thanks 1
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
Posted

Does anyones truck tailgate come extremely close to their 5th wheel when hooking up? My tailgate of my Chevy HD 3500 comes within about 1inch (when tailgate is down) of the 5th wheel trailer when hooking up to the king pin. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...