Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am thinking about buying the silverado ZR2 , but i am worried about the 6.2 reliability how reliable is it ? I read alot about it some people say its invincible and some say its not , anyone have experience with it ? I only tried the vortecs 4.8,5.3,6.0 those are reliable as hell never had issues with them but with all the lifter failure i am hearing about should i be worried ?

Posted

Love my 6.2 and get the same mileage as the 5.3 I had, just cost more to fill up as I run high test only.  The lifter issues were on both the 5.3 and 6.2, I would hope they have it worked out by now as it was supposed to be only builds thru March 21. Lots of information here about it.

  • Like 1
Posted

Nearly 2-years and 20,500 miles and I contnue to be happy with my 6.2! 

No problems (other than the rear wondow leak..resolved), great peformance, reasonable mpg's and overall solid build, I'm well satisfied!

  • Like 1
Posted

Over 3 years, 33,000 miles and zero issues with my 6.2, I love it, no regrets and if something happened to the truck that required me buying a new one I'd buy the 6.2 again in a heartbeat! 

  • Like 2
Posted

Almost 3 years, 34,000 miles and Truck has been great.  Would buy the 6.2 again for sure.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Had a 2018 GMC 6.2L with 8 Speed old AFM never had issues. Had 35k on it when sold it. Got excellent mileage.  Averaged 23 mpgs all day long running 70 mph to work.  Only reason I got rid of it was because of the 1 to 2 jerky/clunk shifting of the transmission.  Never felt right driving in town. On highway is was smooth. 

 

Have a 2019 High Country 6.2L with 10 Speed. Best truck I've owned except gas mileage isn't close to my Sierra. But I love the extra room of T1's over K2 body style. The 10 speed is a game changer.  

 

I too have thought about a ZR2.  Awesome looking truck, I just feel for the price of $72K fully loaded, GM needed to offer more power, bigger wheel options, and a panoramic sunroof for that price. 

 

 

Posted (edited)

2018 6.2 crew cab standard bed SLT. Excellent engine. 8L90 has been fine for me except cold shifting is a bit clunky and lurches until warmed up then it shifts excellent. I prob have the hydroscopic trans fluid still but i'm in dry AZ and its only got 18k miles on it so will attempt to flush myself at 30k miles. Friends and I notice the not smooth idle of the 6.2 but its totally normal. Towed 7klbs from 1k ft elevation to 7k ft and no issues going 70 mph up long grades. Premium gas is the downside especially in my area where its at least 40 - 60 cents more than regular. Still I'd choose the 6.2 again. Only other motor I would consider is the 3.0 I6 Duramax since it has all the torque of the 6.2 at a nice low rpm with excellent mpg but downside is 2/3 the hp of the 6.2.

Of course the 5.3 is a good engine as well but for the small premium upcharge go for the 6.2 if its available in the truck you want.

L86 6.2L EcoTec3 Engine Specs: Performance, Bore & Stroke, Cylinder Heads, Cam Specs & More - OnAllCylinders

Edited by 2018GMC
Posted

They say that the lifter problem was isolated to a bad batch back in early 2021.  The previous trucks used the same lifters I think and they didn't have nearly as many problems as the recent 6.2L's have had.  It's a great engine, and GM is fixing them when they go bad, even after warranty in some cases.  I wouldn't worry about it and buy what makes you happy.

Posted

8 speed is now only used on the 2.7L T engine.

3.0, 5.3 and 6.2 all use the 10 speed. 

 

MQE    Transmission, 8-speed automatic, electronically controlled with overdrive and tow/haul mode. Includes Cruise Grade Braking and Powertrain Grade Braking
1 -  Included and only available with (L3B) 2.7L Turbo engine. 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 780 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...