Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Was reading an Article that by 2026 Biden is Requiring All Automobiles to get a minimum of 40 MPG. 

Can't wait until 2026 to order a New 3500 dually getting 40 mpg, yeeha.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, James Beyer said:

Was reading an Article that by 2026 Biden is Requiring All Automobiles to get a minimum of 40 MPG. 

Can't wait until 2026 to order a New 3500 dually getting 40 mpg, yeeha.

 

I haven't read anything about that, but I'm thinking that maybe it only applies to light duty vehicles?

Posted

The avg fuel mileage standard will be 40mpg, not every new vehicle getting 40mpg.

 

Heavy duty trucks will likely still be exempt from all this.

 

This just means more hybrid vehicles and more electric vehicles to offset for all the SUV and trucks getting mid 20's for avg mpg and trucks in the mid to upper teens. The tree huggers of the world and the far left people of the government obviously have no clue how hard it already is to achieve the mpg numbers we do today in cars and trucks. They think with the flip of the switch we can just "make it better" like magic. Plus all these states banning ICE vehicles in less than 8 years or something, they must think that infrastructure happens like magic too.

 

GM, Ford, Dodge etc etc just have to have those vehicles available for purchase. We all know that the vast majority of vehicles still bought will never be at that 40 mpg value.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, CamGTP said:

The avg fuel mileage standard will be 40mpg, not every new vehicle getting 40mpg.

 

Heavy duty trucks will likely still be exempt from all this.

 

This just means more hybrid vehicles and more electric vehicles to offset for all the SUV and trucks getting mid 20's for avg mpg and trucks in the mid to upper teens. The tree huggers of the world and the far left people of the government obviously have no clue how hard it already is to achieve the mpg numbers we do today in cars and trucks. They think with the flip of the switch we can just "make it better" like magic. Plus all these states banning ICE vehicles in less than 8 years or something, they must think that infrastructure happens like magic too.

 

GM, Ford, Dodge etc etc just have to have those vehicles available for purchase. We all know that the vast majority of vehicles still bought will never be at that 40 mpg value.

True, but I don't see cars getting >60MPG to offset the fuel guzzling of trucks and large SUVs.

Posted

Thank You guys,

After reading the article, I took it as kind of a wishing well joke. 

Though it would be nice to have 3/4 ton and 1 ton trucks getting 30+ mpg, and 1/2 ton high 30's.  

Maybe Biden, with all of his wisdom, has already figured out how to make it work with his memory pills and prune juice he bought while being a truck driver, lol.

 

Posted

Corporate average across the whole line of vehicles. Not for every vehicle. And if manufacturers don't make the number, I'm sure all it will mean is they will merely have to pay fines etc. And guess who will pay those fines? It will be passed down to the consumers  in gas guzzler tax etc lol

Posted

If I heard this right the 40 mpg number was a rollback from a higher number. Part of a reality check. Could be wrong but how I understood it.  

Posted

Biden and the Left are living a dream. They are putting forth all these mandates not realizing that they are not achievable until years from now. Pure ignorance.  Remember this when you vote in the midterms. 

  • Like 1
Posted

It’s really simple. You make it reliable, reasonably priced we the people will buy it. We are living the results of forcing a mandate. Obama care was first now the war on fuel. The southern boarder still baffles me. It just doesn’t make sense. I think real soon it will become obvious. Payola and China. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, pokismoki said:

I dont get it, USA has a ton of oil in Alaska  thats un-tapped, why bother with this mpg limits??

 

Really? 

 

1.) Finite resource. Grandchildren might like to drive that 67 GTO in the barn someday. 

2.) Higher MPG also reduces emissions. Kind of a no brain thing. We all like to breath. 

3.) The higher the motor efficiency the more power it makes from less fuel. OR Way more power from the same amount of fuel.

 

Power per cubic inch has been on a steady rise since the first motors were designed. Imagine the tech used to get 50% eff on a modern 2 liter motor used on a 7.4 liter sized 60's motor.  

 

 

Try this a drool https://www.koenigsegg.com/gemera/engine-and-drivetrain/

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I’m seeing lately that Biden wants a waver on E-15 fuel blend to offset raising fuel prices. Ten cents a gallon is what’s being said. The problem is it causes pollution I’m hearing. Wouldn’t that be counterproductive in the global warming crowd? Proving once again the people in power haven’t got a clue. Ethanol is corn right? So let’s use more corn for fuel, brilliant. Didn’t I hear that there’s going to be a food shortage because of the war? Again brilliant. Corn is food. Last time I checked we can’t eat oil. Wait, Wait we have that here right? That also makes cars run. Shame we don’t have enough. Wait we do! Biden shut that down. So let’s go hungry and use corn for fuel. Do our leaders ever think ahead? Obviously not this bunch.

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, pokismoki said:

I dont get it, USA has a ton of oil in Alaska  thats un-tapped, why bother with this mpg limits??

Cause oil companies won't pump, refine, or sell it?  They have prices and net earning right where they want them and its not political.  It's profit driven.  Don't allow facts get in the way of blaming any president for oil issues. Big oil doesn't care who is in office. They are world wide profit makers.  The markets are world markets not national.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I’m seeing lately that Biden wants a waver on E-15 fuel blend to offset raising fuel prices. Ten cents a gallon is what’s being said. The problem is it causes pollution I’m hearing. Wouldn’t that be counterproductive in the global warming crowd? Proving once again the people in power haven’t got a clue. Ethanol is corn right? So let’s use more corn for fuel, brilliant. Didn’t I hear that there’s going to be a food shortage because of the war? Again brilliant. Corn is food. Last time I checked we can’t eat oil. Wait, Wait we have that here right? That also makes cars run. Shame we don’t have enough. Wait we do! Biden shut that down. So let’s go hungry and use corn for fuel. Do our leaders ever think ahead? Obviously not this bunch.

Once again you are so off base to reality its amazing but considering  the sources you listen to, read. Oh well you and 30% think Q is actually a person.   

 

E15 produces less emissions than E10.  AGREED feedstocks need to be other than field corn,  it's not hard to produce feedstocks from refuse cellulosic  sources.  So instead of dumping those you make it into  ethanol fuels. 

 

CRC got data back in 2013 time frame that was messed up to show ethanol producing more emissions, turns out it was the gasoline used to cold blend with the ethanol throwing off emissions readings. 

 

https://fixourfuel.com

 

Posted (edited)
On 4/11/2022 at 10:56 AM, KARNUT said:

It’s really simple. You make it reliable, reasonably priced we the people will buy it. We are living the results of forcing a mandate. Obama care was first now the war on fuel. The southern boarder still baffles me. It just doesn’t make sense. I think real soon it will become obvious. Payola and China. 

Southern border a mess because both major parties won't fix it.  Like abortion, transgender issues, prayer in schools, gun rights, Q, CRT, all wedge issues to wedge the panties of  uninformed and naturally authoritarian leaning lemmings to vote for outright idiots who are literally taking voting freedoms away right as we read this.  

It's not party its being led to a slaughter of our collective real constitutional rights being taken away.  

 

Then there's the issue of screwing up central America for the past 150 years and people running from certain death there.  Some of it US atrocities and profit needs coming home to roost.  Anyone here fight in Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras in 80's?    I didn't think so.  

Edited by customboss
Add Honduras since it was our main FOB

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I gotta say, I'm enjoying your narration. The troubles you've been having are amusing as you describe them. It's good to see that you're finally getting some satisfaction out the old beast though.
    • Declaring victory would upset the demons that possess this Blazer, so I won't. But I did make progress today--after it put up a fight. Always a fight.   I had the day off so I spent the morning cleaning up the shop and I thought I'd get ahead of things by filling the cooling system in prep for the final part I needed to arrive: the driver's side knock sensor. Glug, glug, glug....and then the unmistakable sound of liquid hitting the shop floor. It induces the same chagrin when the sonar and targeting laser temporarily malfunction during a late night bladder evacuation over the toilet with the bathroom light off. D'OH!!! That made a mess...   Oh, hey, that knock sensor I removed? It threads into a wet port. Who knew?! Learn something new every day. Put a pin in that chore, I'll fill it the rest of the way later.   The knock sensor arrived at about 1pm. I threaded it in, connected the wire, filled up the coolant, checked for leaks, and... drumroll.... fingers crossed for a perfect start, excellent timing, model fuel trims, and ...no squeaks... Here goes.....   No, it didn't start. At all. I cranked it a few times and it wasn't sounding good. Furthermore, I heard leaking again. Jesus H Tapdancing Christ, stop leaking all over the dang floor. This time I had accidentally overfilled the coolant reservoir and the churn of the water pump via cranking caused a bit to burp out. Ok, just, breathe... Put the flamethrower down. Dang thing wouldn't burn anyway, leaks too much...   Did you know the rotation of a round crank sensor in a round hole, matters? I do now. Took me about half hour to retrace steps and realize what I had done. Then it started right up.   No squeaks. The squeak was the old balancer.   Once it entered closed loop, fuel trims are dead on, hovering right around zero at idle. No more -30%. I'll credit the injector rebuild on that one.   Timing? I think there's an OBD 1.5 translation error with my Actron scanner. It's anywhere from -20 to -30 at idle, sometimes as high as -40 cruising. Sorry, the engine just isn't running that smoothly at -40 degrees ignition advance. It's just not. It's smooth all through the rev range and has decent power. I'm going to have to trust the seat of my pants on this one.   The new exhaust is very quiet. The old catalytic converter? Not melted, but definitely not healthy. Rains glitter when you turn it on its end...all the precious metal is flaking out. Once the new exhaust system burned in/smoked off a bit, the engine's exhaust smell is normal again. Not that I'd recommend going around huffing car exhaust, but, you know what I mean?   One problem to correct. The new exhaust has the opposite problem of the old spliced up exhaust. It wants to hit the floor where the old one wanted to rest on the cross member. Happy medium, please? Still noodling on that one, need to look at how I can adjust some hangers.   I don't know what's next. On one hand I want to run away from this thing as far and as fast as I can -- there have been a lot of NOT fun moments. On the other, now that it kinda drives nice, maybe drive it around for a little bit?   Shhh... it's not currently dripping oil all over the floor. I can see just a little wet at the bottom of the timing cover where it meets the oil pan seal. It's not dripping multiple drops with every ignition cycle, in fact, after some driving this evening it has yet to even form a drop that could drip off yet. But the weekend is young... I fully expect this could turn into Exxon Valdez by Sunday. Because this Blazer hates me. LOL.      
    • About that:   Once upon a time in a land far far away lived a car company that was shy about taking your money and wanted to be sure that they gave you more that you asked for so that you'd come back. No really, not a fairytale. 😱   But after the field got thinned out enough to limit the competition it seemed good enough to give you only what you asked for. Fair enough I say but in such a market you have to give something the others are not or they go to the one who does. Gimmicks or glitz. Oh, fins and chrome. Yea, shinny crow like cars. Yum.    Field narrows a bit more and 'brand loyalty' becomes a thing and the minute it does they start thinking to themselves, "Could we make more money if we gave them less than they expect and they will hang in there for brand and comfort with the known?" They gave it a try and da*n, it worked!!    Well, what if we teach them, groom them into believing that less is "Normal" and cut some more corners. Will that work? Oh heck yea!    🤔 I wonder, can we give then WAY less than they expect and make them mad enough to spit nails and STILL get them to pay up? Sure, if we get everyone else to do the same so that the choice is less or nothing at all. How would be do that? Platform sharing.  What a concept, right?  Steal like there is no tomorrow and it's legal too!    Truth is no one is going to give up driving, not for very long. The Gen Z crowd is fine with it and will be as long as someone not Gen Z will haul them around. At some point we all die.    Economic voting only works if you cast a NO vote now and again and enough of them to get dumb and dumber to wise up. Well, that's how I was taught anyway. And it should have worked. Would have worked. But the Bail out!!   Look, you have another choice if  you take that bag off your head. If the dumb it down to some predetermined expectation of how John Q Public will use it the, that is under design it to failure they you use it to a lower stress mode. D'ho!    A 1950 Royal Enfield Bullet 500 will go anywhere a Suzuki Hayabusa will and for just as long. But you will have to treat it for what it is and not for what you wish it was. 
    • Maybe I was just too unlucky, but I had nothing but bad luck with Bridgestones. Out of 3 sets, they all started losing a lot of air when they got down to about 1/2 tread life, and at that point also wet traction suffered more than it should have. Also, the only tire I ever had in my 60 years of driving that had a side wall blow out was a Bridgestone.   I'm currently running Goodyear Wrangler Workhorse AT and am very happy with them.   
    • maybe when the trip is over, check all the other joints in the front end, like all the ball joints, tie rods, pitman & idler arms, etc...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...