Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/15/2022 at 7:15 AM, KARNUT said:

I can name several gas and diesel vehicles that got mid and upper 20 miles per gallon from the 80s and 90s. The trick ponies there’re producing today with cylinder deactivation as an example. Aren’t for the end user’s fuel number. Across the board for the manufacturers it trickles up the numbers for them. There’re dilemma is instead of producing naturally high fuel mileage sedans with low profits. Their  aim is to push high profit large trucks and SUVs that are bricks through the air. And somehow in a controlled environment getting decent fuel mileage out of them. The new scam is electric trucks. Another way to meet their over all mileage numbers. That have  little use for the masses. I love trucks. I’m not paying a 20K up charge for a luxury truck. When I can have a high fuel mileage luxery car that hauls as$ and a good used truck for the same money. 

Last I looked at how mpg ratings are achieved for manufacturers, not for specific gas burning cars, if it's a hybrid or some other form of alternate fuel, such as ethanol, the manufacturer gets awarded as of the alternate fuel vehicle achieves 50% more mpg than it actually did. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
On 10/15/2022 at 12:22 PM, FJB said:

I did trip this summer in my 2020 ram hemi from Detroit to Chicago and I got 24.7 mpg doing 70 mph one way loaded with 4 adults and bad full of language and one way alone  , I thought that was crazy good fuel milage for a full size truck with a v8, I have a video to prove it for non believers .

I drove from San Diego to a small town on the Nevada/Arizona border north of Las Vegas back in December.  Cruise was set at 78mph (8 over the posted limit), and air conditioning was on.  I saw 24.4 mpg on my 2020 Silverado Trail Boss LT with the 6.2 and a few things adding to drag such as tow mirrors and offroad lights.  I have a dash camera setup but didn't save the video because i don't care what the nonbelievers have to say, and the numbers are still showing as best mpg in my screens.  Unlike a trip from Chicago to Detroit, I had mountains to drive over. 

 

Normally Rams are full of bad language when they aren't moving because they're on the side of the road.  Must've been a rough trip if the bad language occurred while still doing 70mph.

 

Imo, OP's mpg was average

Edited by Transient
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Transient said:

I drove from San Diego to a small town on the Nevada/Arizona border north of Las Vegas back in December.  Cruise was set at 78mph (8 over the posted limit), and air conditioning was on.  I saw 24.4 mpg on my 2020 Silverado Trail Boss LT with the 6.2 and a few things adding to drag such as tow mirrors and offroad lights.  I have a dash camera setup but didn't save the video because i don't care what the nonbelievers have to say, and the numbers are still showing as best mpg in my screens.  Unlike a trip from Chicago to Detroit, I had mountains to drive over. 

 

Normally Rams are full of bad language when they aren't moving because they're on the side of the road.  Must've been a rough trip if the bad language occurred while still doing 70mph.

 

Imo, OP's mpg was average

ok mountain boy take it easy you will blow a head gasket 

Edited by FJB
Posted

Manufacturer rated MPG are the pits. Where in the real world driving are you driving in a controlled environment to achieve said MPG?? Real driving is stop n go, idling at traffic, stepping on it to pass the jerk that won't move from your blind spot or just simply heavy foot enjoying your ride. 

Posted

UPDATE to my original post. I just did a major road trip. Total of 3,910 miles and got a total of 19.2 mpg. Mostly interstate miles (3,460). Usually driving 5 - 10 over.  Looking like mileage in the 19s is about what I can expect from my 6.2 ten speed. 

Posted
On 10/16/2022 at 5:34 PM, Transient said:

You forgot cleaner engine emissions and a revised EPA testing program that makes it more difficult to obtain the inflated numbers your Avalanche was assigned.  Yesterday's cars will not achieve the same results as today's cars under the current testing. 

 

 

Exactly.

 

Original vs. the new corrected MPG ratings of a 2002 Avalanche.  

 

2wd.thumb.png.e6c5c5ef4011484932589c9b21fd7665.png

4wd.thumb.png.f49e6c1143ee47ac45a5876299f60365.png

 

And here is compared to a 2022 5.3 2wd and 4wd non Trail Boss.  

 

comparo.thumb.png.5b89bffee61c1488280533927eb50212.png

Posted

I have an 02 Avalanche. The only trip I took was taking my brother in law to get his camper. At 72 mph I got 16 mpg. Following him back at 65 mph I got 18 mpg. Every 2000s GM truck I owned got pretty much the same. My 14 GMC usually got around 22. It’s no secret these things are bricks the faster you go the worse mileage you’ll get. Most of my trucks had the middle gearing. I liked crips performance rather than maximum fuel mileage.

  • Like 1
Posted

I have never bought a vehicle because of the mileage it got, I bought it because I liked it. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I buy the 'deal' first; then the look with heavy consideration is give to operating cost. Most of the time I can have all three. Sometimes the deal is so good it covers the efficiency even if it's not. 😉 $10 K buys allot of fuel. 

  • Like 1
Posted

The deal?

I liked the vehicle, got the best deal I could. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Trading ever 2-3 years with high mileage I only bought deals for work. Most just happened to be GMC. At least 10K off. Company paid for gas, wasn’t an consideration until I retired. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

I buy the 'deal' first; then the look with heavy consideration is give to operating cost. Most of the time I can have all three. Sometimes the deal is so good it covers the efficiency even if it's not. 😉 $10 K buys allot of fuel. 

TOC total operating cost is what a trucking company, road maintainer, fleet looks at and you are spot on Grumpy Bear but wearing shorts like KARNUT can lower fuel usage even in an old tank Avalanche.  LOL  

 

As an aside isn't it odd that the new Silverado has that ugly valance fastback thingie like the Avalanche?  Maybe the body had to be strengthened for all the weight of the batteries below?  

 

I used to proctor FTP and HWY  EPA approved testing but my brain is melting and can't recall enough to add to the conversation. 

 

I remember versions of these but can't remember the actual names of the cycles aside what I posted above. 

 

https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/articles/fotw-1141-july-6-2020-five-different-test-cycles-are-used-determine-fuel

Posted
45 minutes ago, customboss said:

TOC total operating cost is what a trucking company, road maintainer, fleet looks at and you are spot on Grumpy Bear but wearing shorts like KARNUT can lower fuel usage even in an old tank Avalanche.  LOL  

 

As an aside isn't it odd that the new Silverado has that ugly valance fastback thingie like the Avalanche?  Maybe the body had to be strengthened for all the weight of the batteries below?  

 

I used to proctor FTP and HWY  EPA approved testing but my brain is melting and can't recall enough to add to the conversation. 

 

I remember versions of these but can't remember the actual names of the cycles aside what I posted above. 

 

https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/articles/fotw-1141-july-6-2020-five-different-test-cycles-are-used-determine-fuel

The Avalanche was very popular. GM quit making them in favor of a four door pickup. I like the Avalanche because it rides better than a pickup being it’s basically a suburban. And I like the way it looks and it’s different. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, diyer2 said:

The deal?

I liked the vehicle, got the best deal I could. 

 

Most people do it that way. I'm just not 'most people.

 

I get the best deal to be made not the best deal I can. There is a difference and it isn't one a person can force. It's more like opportunity meeting resources. I can walk out the door with a hundred grand in my pocket and get robbed, but its still maybe the 'best deal I can make (force). My best deals come when I'm not even looking to deal. More often than not, when I don't even have a need. 

 

I've never seen the asset yet that I'd move heaven and earth to acquire. I rarely do "Want". I have, but it's rare and it's rarely a deal. :P 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Best deal to be made or best deal I could, same to me. When I bought my 2102 it took over 2 weeks and I walked out twice. I wasn't trying to steal the truck, just a fair price. A fair price is the buyer's decision.

Do what makes you happy.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...