Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Have a 22 Sierra 1500 Limited, 6.2, 10 speed. Just did a major trip and got 22 mpg over the first 800 miles. Total trip was 2,400 miles with an overall mpg of 19.9. 
 

Was wondering if that is good, bad, or average for a 6.2?

 

Tom…

 

UPDATE

Just did a major road trip. Total of 3,910 miles and got a total of 19.2 mpg. Mostly interstate miles (3,460). Usually driving 5 - 10 over.  Looking like mileage in the 19s is about what I can expect from my 6.2 ten speed. 

Edited by Tom73
  • Like 1
Posted

Very average fuel mileage if you ask me. So many factors come into play with fuel mileage and you are getting basically exactly what the EPA rated that truck at. If you went slower at highway speeds, had zero idle time and no around time driving it would have been a higher average but that just isn't real world driving.

Posted

20 years later basically the same mileage as my Avalanche. Six less gears, no cylinder deactivation and a 373 gear. Half the maintenance cost and replacement cost. Progress.

  • Like 1
Posted

Brother in laws 1988 Pontiac Grand Am with the Quad 4 - 2.4 L got 30 mpg back then. Our 19 Honda CRV got the same mileage, smaller 1.6 L turbo motor. 

So how far have we come.

Posted

64 Chevy II , 230 .got 26mpg and passed emission test for new cars in the 80's with no problem, granted the emission tests were pretty primative back then

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

20 years later basically the same mileage as my Avalanche. Six less gears, no cylinder deactivation and a 373 gear. Half the maintenance cost and replacement cost. Progress.

Love the Avalanche. Had two. Traded the second one for the Sierra. Would have gotten a third Avalanche but they don’t make them any longer. Had 216,000 miles on it and no driveline issues. 

Edited by Tom73
Posted

I can name several gas and diesel vehicles that got mid and upper 20 miles per gallon from the 80s and 90s. The trick ponies there’re producing today with cylinder deactivation as an example. Aren’t for the end user’s fuel number. Across the board for the manufacturers it trickles up the numbers for them. There’re dilemma is instead of producing naturally high fuel mileage sedans with low profits. Their  aim is to push high profit large trucks and SUVs that are bricks through the air. And somehow in a controlled environment getting decent fuel mileage out of them. The new scam is electric trucks. Another way to meet their over all mileage numbers. That have  little use for the masses. I love trucks. I’m not paying a 20K up charge for a luxury truck. When I can have a high fuel mileage luxery car that hauls as$ and a good used truck for the same money. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Tom73 said:

Love the Avalanche. Had two. Traded the second one for the Sierra. Would have gotten a third Avalanche but they don’t make them any longer. Had 216,000 miles on it and no driveline issues. 

I met a guy yesterday that had several including the last year model. My 02 continues to be almost flawless and still looks new. 

Posted

I did trip this summer in my 2020 ram hemi from Detroit to Chicago and I got 24.7 mpg doing 70 mph one way loaded with 4 adults and bad full of language and one way alone  , I thought that was crazy good fuel milage for a full size truck with a v8, I have a video to prove it for non believers .

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Someone wiped out a Avalanche this week..more used parts in the system..

 

spacer.png

Edited by elcamino
Posted

Check out the NEW 2024 Chevy Silverado ( Elec. ) Look's like a Avalanche , same drop down window (rear ) same fins on box.

Posted
16 hours ago, Tom73 said:

Have a 22 Sierra 1500 Limited, 6.2, 10 speed. Just did a major trip and got 22 mpg over the first 800 miles. Total trip was 2,400 miles with an overall mpg of 19.9. 
 

Was wondering if that is good, bad, or average for a 6.2?

 

Tom…

Depends how fast you were going.

Posted
28 minutes ago, redwngr said:

Depends how fast you were going.

I’m not a speed devil. Usually 5-10 over. Ten on Interstates, five on secondary roads, and speed limit in town. Avoid cities like the plague. 

Posted
On 10/15/2022 at 5:19 AM, KARNUT said:

20 years later basically the same mileage as my Avalanche. Six less gears, no cylinder deactivation and a 373 gear. Half the maintenance cost and replacement cost. Progress.

You forgot cleaner engine emissions and a revised EPA testing program that makes it more difficult to obtain the inflated numbers your Avalanche was assigned.  Yesterday's cars will not achieve the same results as today's cars under the current testing. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,993
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    President Roberto
    Newest Member
    President Roberto
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 193 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...