Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

🤣 I don’t understand half the things he posts. I would guess he may be very intelligent. I’m average but very successful. I only post back by experience. So when I question the logic of things sometimes I get in trouble. I admit I lived in a bubble of like minded individuals. I’m still learning the logic of individuals thinking. I finally realized people can rationalize anything. Example. At dinner it was mentioned by my grandson he hit a deer. I asked is your car drivable. He said yes because he was driving his mother’s. But it wasn’t his fault. I said yes it was you should have been driving your own car. Is it fixed I asked. Again he looked surprised. I said you need to get it fixed. You shouldn’t use a car from someone else unless you can fix or replace it. Many people have that logic. Well they have insurance. Shouldn’t work that way. That’s my logic, his was different. 

 

Nobody cares

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, customboss said:

Can’t fix stupid. Next! 

 

You like stories, right? :) 

 

When I was filling up Pepper last the fellow at the pump next to me and at least my age was filling up a fairly new T1**. I asked him how he like it. He replied it was his wife's truck and he was just doing her a favor. He's a Dodge guy. 

 

Then with thumbs under suspenders he continues, "It has a quarter million miles on it and runs great!" then adds, "it's a rusted bucket of junk now but hey, Midwest winters and all" 

 

So I inquire, "Does it use oil"? 

 

He looked puzzled and says," It has a quarter million miles on it mister. Of course it uses oil. They all do. Started using before the first hundred thousand". 

 

"This one is just short of 200K and uses none." I offer

 

He takes a long look...."LIAR" 😱

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

He takes a long look...."LIAR" 😱

 

Prime example of the difference in 'expectations' various people have for the same situation.

 

He's not just accepting a preventable situation as normal, he's giddy with his normal and willing to do battle to prevent anyone from upsetting that warm fuzzy place he lives in... Bet he's even more forceful if he'd see someone sharing the view it isn't normal with others on some truck forum. 😱 Glad we don't have any of those type around here, eh? 😬

 

I'm guessing he is one of those fellows that lives by the adage, "I'll believe it when I see it". Wonder how that works for those born blind? 🤔 Do their parents not exist? 

Posted
57 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Prime example of the difference in 'expectations' various people have for the same situation.

 

He's not just accepting a preventable situation as normal, he's giddy with his normal and willing to do battle to prevent anyone from upsetting that warm fuzzy place he lives in... Bet he's even more forceful if he'd see someone sharing the view it isn't normal with others on some truck forum. 😱 Glad we don't have any of those type around here, eh? 😬

 

I'm guessing he is one of those fellows that lives by the adage, "I'll believe it when I see it". Wonder how that works for those born blind? 🤔 Do their parents not exist? 

It’s the human condition. Our society does not reward thinking outside the societal box. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, customboss said:

It’s the human condition. Our society does not reward thinking outside the societal box. 

So the guy has an old dodge that has lots of mileage and rusty from winter driving. And his wife drives the new vehicle. And that’s bad? What am I missing. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

You like stories, right? :) 

 

When I was filling up Pepper last the fellow at the pump next to me and at least my age was filling up a fairly new T1**. I asked him how he like it. He replied it was his wife's truck and he was just doing her a favor. He's a Dodge guy. 

 

Then with thumbs under suspenders he continues, "It has a quarter million miles on it and runs great!" then adds, "it's a rusted bucket of junk now but hey, Midwest winters and all" 

 

So I inquire, "Does it use oil"? 

 

He looked puzzled and says," It has a quarter million miles on it mister. Of course it uses oil. They all do. Started using before the first hundred thousand". 

 

"This one is just short of 200K and uses none." I offer

 

He takes a long look...."LIAR" 😱

 

I'd be concerned if an engine started using oil before 100k.

 

Then again, I live somewhere where vehicles don't rust out. At all. The chassis and bodies outlive the engines where I'm from.

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

I'd be concerned if an engine started using oil before 100k.

 

Then again, I live somewhere where vehicles don't rust out. At all. The chassis and bodies outlive the engines where I'm from.

 

Maybe it’s a beater and he’s proud it’s lasted this long. 

Posted
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

Maybe it’s a beater and he’s proud it’s lasted this long. 

 

Maybe. I'm reading that the T1 is his wife's truck, it started burning oil with less than 100k, and then called someone a liar for saying his engine with almost 200k doesn't burn oil.

 

Dodge guy sounds like a garden variety idiot to me.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

Maybe. I'm reading that the T1 is his wife's truck, it started burning oil with less than 100k, and then called someone a liar for saying his engine with almost 200k doesn't burn oil.

 

Dodge guy sounds like a garden variety idiot to me.

Probably, but it would have been fun proving him wrong.

Posted

Enough Viscosity

 

I'll get to 'how much is enough' question when I have a bit more time. For now a foundation of the viscosity wear relationship as accepted by the study of the physics, wear model development and private research of commercial interests. This isn't a topic for debate. It is established fact. It is not presented for debate but placed in evidence. 

 

Another wear model to show the effect of viscosity on absolute wear. This one pitting Group IV/V bended 0W16, 0W20 and 0W30 with a mineral 0W20 in reference. And once again confirming the relationship that wear and viscosity are inversely related. 

 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40544-023-0854-3

 

Add to the other multiple published SAE studies. 

Posted

Just change it more frequently and none if this matters IMO. That's what I do and I have never had an engine problem.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

But people want to "science" just how frequently and data which confirms their desire for changing on a shorter interval. I get that. Also, most people aren't that. Changing oil is a necessary chore they try to remember to do on time as part of owning a wheeled appliance with an internal combustion engine. That's where KISS comes in, chemical engineering doctorate not required. But somewhere along the way people people with those credentials made it "safe" for the general population to follow a basic maintenance schedule without questioning the "why" too much.

 

I also see more answers than questions being asked on here about oil change intervals. I think that's where I get confused. Who is the audience for all this information if it's already been answered, and nobody has asked since then?

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Atlas said:

But people want to "science" just how frequently and data which confirms their desire for changing on a shorter interval. I get that. Also, most people aren't that. Changing oil is a necessary chore they try to remember to do on time as part of owning a wheeled appliance with an internal combustion engine. That's where KISS comes in, chemical engineering doctorate not required. But somewhere along the way people people with those credentials made it "safe" for the general population to follow a basic maintenance schedule without questioning the "why" too much.

 

I also see more answers than questions being asked on here about oil change intervals. I think that's where I get confused. Who is the audience for all this information if it's already been answered, and nobody has asked since then?

 

I listen to a show called CarPro. An ex multi dealership owner turned radio personality and advisor. Going on 26 years now. He has multiple dealerships of all brands who supposedly give the best deals with little hassle. I’ve never used the service because I have gotten better deals with my own research. Usually year end, longest on lot and certified pre owned. I’ve bought dozens of trucks for my business and personal use. An interesting call came in from a caller who was complaining about the length of time it took to get parts for her 15 year old low mileage vehicle. They had to go aftermarket to find a replacement part. According to the host automotive manufacturers only have to carry original parts for 10 years. Being most people fall in the 15K a year mileage average for driving. It easy to conclude that’s what they use for suggesting service intervals for the average car owner. And calculation costs of ownership with payments and maintenance. Most people who care are outliers.

Posted

I do 5k oil changes on our 19 Santa Fe and I use Amsoil OE oil. Clean oil is better oil, simple to me. this is our daily driver.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 461 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...