Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, BB68 said:

 

Mine was 3.55s  and that trip was a mix of 60 and 70 mph. Also mind you that was back before our gas went to sheet with our base gas still at 87 octane and one of additives being banned by epa

All my trucks were modified with at least a hand held tune requiring premium fuel. Along with modified induction and exhaust. Before the mid eighties high rise intakes, headers sometimes cams. They were so lame HP wise, we would go through them. Being much younger all nighters for performance was common. That would include my brothers and even my father. 

Posted
On 6/26/2023 at 11:09 AM, SC4R3C120W said:

I'm in the 3.0 diesel and commute 120 miles. Here's my 400mi mpg average with best listed.

IMG_5832.JPG

IMG_5834.JPG

I've never gotten anywhere close to that.  22 was my best -- 500 mile round trip.  You must be driving very flat terrain.  What oil do you use?

Posted
53 minutes ago, Jworks said:

I've never gotten anywhere close to that.  22 was my best -- 500 mile round trip.  You must be driving very flat terrain.  What oil do you use?

Yeah i can only laugh at some of the estimate mileage ratings from people here and not a chance is either a 5.3 or 6.2 getting 30 mpg, not unless you are driving down a mountain.🤣

  • Like 3
Posted

Beg to differ. My overall MPG out of the computer has been consistent with hand calculation.

 

And 30 mpg with a 3.0 diesel is a lot more common, obviously, than a 5.3 V8. I averaged at around 23 mpg.

 

Now, if I were to do a 400 mile trip completely on the highway, without stopping, I can do it.

 

The way it is, I drive 48 miles on the highway and it gets 30 mpg. Then I drive two miles uphill to my house, it's a killer so I watch the average drop down to 25. It sucks.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, KARNUT said:

All my trucks were modified with at least a hand held tune requiring premium fuel. Along with modified induction and exhaust. Before the mid eighties high rise intakes, headers sometimes cams. They were so lame HP wise, we would go through them. Being much younger all nighters for performance was common. That would include my brothers and even my father. 

 

Our 70's 80's 454s received 60's 396 cast iron intakes($40 swapmeet items) a mild cam, and dual glass pack exhaust. results in +4 mpg on them with about 425hp 500lbs torque. very fun vehicles after that. btw we would reuse the factory Qjet   

Posted
17 minutes ago, BB68 said:

 

Our 70's 80's 454s received 60's 396 cast iron intakes($40 swapmeet items) a mild cam, and dual glass pack exhaust. results in +4 mpg on them with about 425hp 500lbs torque. very fun vehicles after that. btw we would reuse the factory Qjet   

My 92 Chevy lowered truck engine.

IMG_0088.jpeg

  • Like 3
Posted
On 6/28/2023 at 3:16 PM, Luc1f3r said:

LOL what are yall doing, drafting big rigs to get these numbers?

Best ive done on a long trip is 20.

19 at4 with 6.2 and 35s.

My pic is from an LZO.

 

Previous was an LM2 that got a little over 26 mpg across 36,000 miles. 

Running 55 - 60  it would get the 25 mile page over to low-mid 30's any day on level ground, no wind, not drafting.

 

Posted

People get confused in thinking that it’s the measurement problem or miss calculation. Actually it’s the drive. Slow and steady up to speed will net the best results. Allowing ample time to reach your destination. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

This is one thing I miss about my Chevrolet.. my Ford F-150 with PowerBoost gets 26 on the highway.

 

That's because the PowerBoost doesn't have cylinder deactivation...

 

With the Chevy, it could go down to one cylinder (about 50 hp, right?). 50 hp provides sufficient power as long as I am very easy on the gas, going a steady 60 mph, on a very flat surface.

Edited by Wiggums
Posted (edited)
On 6/29/2023 at 12:49 PM, Jworks said:

I've never gotten anywhere close to that.  22 was my best -- 500 mile round trip.  You must be driving very flat terrain.  What oil do you use?

 

I use the ACDelco 0-20W that we're supposed to use. Change oil every 5k miles. I typically put on cruise control at 60-65mpg in the morning to work when there's no traffic. If i kept to 55mph, i've seen 40mpg no problem (mostly level ground in Los Angeles). on the way home, it's literally stop and go for 2.5 hours, and i still see the 30mpg average.

 

BTW, i'm in a RST that i put a 3.5" RC lift (top spacer), new UCA, and a 2.5" block in rear.  I changed tires from 265/65/18 (31.5" tall) to 275/70/18 (33" tall). Last, i did the resonator delete and a new hose from the air box to turbo inlet tube. I can't get a CAI in California becasuse of emissions, but if i could change anything else, it would be the turbo inlet tube that comes with the S&B CAI system. From what i've seen, the bigger box and filter actually loses power and pedal response. But unfortunately, they don't sell just the tube, and it's not California legal. 

 

 

image_1080d60d-c92b-4a12-afe3-9d3e7cb0d884_1024x1024.jpg

image_180edcb2-8fe5-4f73-a9f7-efbd286d4d45_1024x1024.webp

Edited by SC4R3C120W
  • Like 1
Posted

here's some older pics showing mileage has been consistent.... the onscreen numbers where actually less than what my calculations were.

IMG_5859.JPG

IMG_5860.JPG

Posted
20 hours ago, 64BAwagon said:

There are 2 things that guys will exaggerate measuring, one of them is mileage. 

 

Ummm, are you claiming people are photoshopping their pics here for internet points? That doesn't even make sense. 

 

The reason some are getting atrocious mileage is due to having 35" tires, and/or lifts. My best (6.2) 50 mile is about 32.3, but this was a very downhill route on a two lane road. Not something I expect to see again. My normal "400 mile" is pretty consistent at about 23-24 under normal "hwy" driving. I have a high country with all seasons. I don't have AT's, which also murder mileage. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,782
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Newest Member
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 412 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I agree with Tim.  As tech heavy as engines are these days, no way I’d be an early buyer of the new 6.6.  Of course, I bought my ‘26 Denali w/the 6.2 after dumping my Tundra with it’s defective 3.5 liter imploding engine disaster, so I’m a little gun-shy.  That said, my 6.2 has been rock solid.  I don’t drive it like I do my BMW Z4 M40i, but I don’t baby it either.  I got a V8 for a reason.  But I’m averaging 18 around town and 22 highway.  I have seen 24 highway as well when I wasn’t loaded up heavy.  Considering my Tundra with the twin turbo V6 only got 14.5 in town and 17 on the road, I’ll take the 6.2 all day, every day.  If I were you, I’d grab a ‘26 while you can.  Inventories are probably gonna start dropping and I’ll bet the deals will start looking sweeter as well.
    • I am curious if anyone has figured out a way to add an hard button AUX or 360 Camera switch to the center row of switches. I have a 2021 AT4, and want to split the hill decent button and add a 360 camera button so that you don't have to go into the center display and locate the camera functionality, etc...   My father's 2024 Yukon XL AT4 and it has a hard button, see below. I found this thread on the Yukons, but it seems like there may not be a part number for the 2021 sierras. https://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/255339-adding-hard-button-for-camera-on-2021/ Anyone else figured this out. Seems like it would need to be a custom switch!   I am getting ready to install the auto stop/start eliminator, so would be nice to knock them out at once.     Upvote1Downvote0Go to comments
    • Looks like the entire state is burning. 😬
    • Through the years it hasn't been my typical method as I tried to drop oil on an engine that was hot from having been worked, however that was not always practical and had to fire up a unit and let it warm up reasonably well and drop the oil when I had the time to do it but am referring to not only vehicles but a variety of farm equipment and highway tractors etc. However on a vehicle where one is crawling under it and the exhaust is nearby to ones body and if wanting to pull the plug without danger of being hit with boiling hot oil or attempting to remove a HOT oil filter, its sure safer and easier to not have everything smoking hot and can remove the filter right away when under the vehicle and let it all drain. Of course its not the end of the world if a bit of oil stays in the engine that might have eventually found its way out, I like to get out as much as possible but any oil changes that take place in shops would rarely be sitting around for very long at all before the plug is thrown back in and filter slapped on and oil poured in and sent out the door quick like. There would be very little time spent ( assuming they even did it ) in starting the engine with oil to fill the filter, then waiting to verify the level on the stick. A good reason to check ones oil level shortly after a shop changed the oil on a vehicle just to make sure its correct and to look under for any oil around the drain plug or filter. 
    • Cool to see another Vermonter!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...