Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 24 2500 SLE Double cab on order. No regrets at all, I stare at its picture daily lol. Costing me around 60k

BUT

For ****** and giggles I just built a Chevy LT 2500 and I have to say, its a better deal. Leather, options, colors, etc.

Cant get leather in a GMC without a crew cab which I dont want and an SLT which is 66k before any options. GMC offers black and white. Everything else is another $500 and the options are slim. 

Im GMC loyal. I think its a better looking truck. But damn....that Chevy has some value to the double cab crowd. 

Posted

Actually the fact that you can build an LTZ double cab is pretty cool. SLE is as high as I can go in a double cab with GMC. 

Posted

I originally had an LT with the bench seat, Z71 Sport package, and leather on order. My wife gave me the green light to get an AT4 since I liked the looks better, so I went that route. My buddy basically got the same LT I ordered and I have to say it's pretty nice for the money. The LT with a few options is probably one of the better values in the HD market for sure. I love my AT4, but I really wish I had the bench seat.

Posted (edited)

We used to call a Pontiac a Chevy with star washers. GMC is a more expensive version of a Chevy without actually giving you anything for the premium you pay for but 'Bling". 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Get what you want.... and it sounds like you did!  I prefer the looks of the GMC front grill.  But, as we know, beauty is in the eye of the beholder! 

 

I picked up my '23 GMC 3500HD, Sierra, White Color, SLE, Crew, 4X4, 6.6L GAS/6 speed, standard bed on the lot.  It had exactly what I wanted, except that it was supposed to come with roof clearance lights but they are excluded from CA trucks!

 

Options included:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package I; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; Trailer Mirrors Package. 

 

Back in August, I could not find this same comparable build truck in a Chevy.  It was difficult enough to find the basic GMC that I found....most trucks GMC/Chevy sold in my area here in SoCal are diesel and fully loaded at $80K plus or are the white very basic work trucks (similar to mine).

 

Edited by SoCal Angler
Posted
3 minutes ago, SoCal Angler said:

Get what you want.... and it sounds like you did!  I prefer the looks of the GMC front grill.  But, as we know, beauty is in the eye of the beholder! 

 

For GMC comparison....I picked up my '23 GMC 3500HD, Sierra, White Color, SLE, Crew, 4X4, 6.6L GAS/6 speed, standard bed on the lot.  It had exactly what I wanted, except that it was supposed to come with roof clearance lights but they are excluded from CA trucks!

 

Options included:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package I; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; Trailer Mirrors Package. 

 

I could not find this same build truck in a Chevy.

 

I tend to agree, the GMCs look a lot better. The only thing I wish it had was leather. If I was going Chevy, it would be easy to get it that way. In GMC I would need a crew cab SLT. A lot more $$. 

Just a fun discussion, no regrets here. Your truck sounds awesome! 

Posted
2 hours ago, TeamSaris said:

I tend to agree, the GMCs look a lot better. The only thing I wish it had was leather. If I was going Chevy, it would be easy to get it that way. In GMC I would need a crew cab SLT. A lot more $$. 

Just a fun discussion, no regrets here. Your truck sounds awesome! 

The good thing about not ordering it with leather is you can probably get higher-quality aftermarket leather for around the same price as the "leather" package is on something like an LT.

  • Like 1
Posted

I was able to save a couple grand on a virtually identical truck when I bought my LTZ vs the GMC SLT I was cross shopping.  In the non-Denali and non-AT4 level specs, I think the Chevy actually has a nicer looking front end, provided you get a black bowtie.

 

Had a Denali before, thought I'd have another GMC, but ended up in a Chevy, and I love it except for the stock wheels.

Posted

I dealt mostly with local dealerships. My Chevy and GMC dealerships were the same size. I always got better deals at my GMC dealership. 

Posted
23 hours ago, the wanderer said:

Just put in katzkin leather. Much higher quality leather for the same price.

down the road some kind of aftermarket leather is the plan. way, way down the road. 

Posted (edited)

I really like the look of the High Country front end with the Chevy logo and dark essentials package.

Did not care much for the older front end where Chevrolet is lettered across the grill.

The leather with the high country is much nicer than the leather that was in my LT. The rear seats seemed vinyl as well.

 

The AT4 and Denali look amazing me as well. I take my Silverado to the GMC dealer that is a few miles from me, they alway do a great job with the services.

Edited by gregus73

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...