Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dealer finished installing the DSSV package to include the rear leafs yesterday.

 

Interstate: Very controlled on road feel.  No Bilstein harshness and no floaty rancho. Crossing bridges with the typical large dips results in no passenger head movement or pogoing effect.  Just smooth and controlled.

 

State hwy: slightly rough road but the suspension seems to know even to release and float and when to give the right control... But never any harshness.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 1/27/2024 at 3:32 AM, Transient said:

Pics?

I'll pull it out later and take a few...nothing really to see other than the shocks...tires cover everything up.

 

Posted
10 hours ago, calgator73 said:

I'll pull it out later and take a few...nothing really to see other than the shocks...tires cover everything up.

 

Girls get aroused by reading, such as 50 Shades of Grey.  Guys get aroused by looking at pics.  I'm a guy.  I need pics.  Thanks for posting some up.

  • Haha 2
Posted

No problem

Screenshot_20240129_153518_Gallery.thumb.jpg.70326e7f7da58e32b43496188cd3fafb.jpg

20 hours ago, calgator73 said:

I'll pull it out later and take a few...nothing really to see other than the shocks...tires cover everything up.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

This is definitely a great upgrade!

 

I very recently drove on a very poorly constructed and maintained state highway in Arizona (St. Hwy 89).

Last year with the stock Rancho's the drive was unpleasant to say the least.

This year drive with DSSV's installed was a much improved driving experience.

 

Highly recommend this upgrade.

 

Posted
On 2/1/2024 at 4:07 AM, silveradosid said:

interesting they used a multi leaf rear spring, do you have the part number for the rear springs

I'll check it out when I get back see if I can find a tag or part number on the spring pack.  

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 1/17/2024 at 9:32 AM, calgator73 said:

Dealer finished installing the DSSV package to include the rear leafs yesterday.

 

Interstate: Very controlled on road feel.  No Bilstein harshness and no floaty rancho. Crossing bridges with the typical large dips results in no passenger head movement or pogoing effect.  Just smooth and controlled.

 

State hwy: slightly rough road but the suspension seems to know even to release and float and when to give the right control... But never any harshness.

 

Could you run the rear DSSVs with standard leafs?

Posted

Yes you can.  Someone else on this forum has done that very thing.  It's a bit of a trade-off in my opinion if you're looking for the articulation and the ride then you go with the springs in the DSSV kit.  If you're willing to give up some articulation and keep payload capacity then you stick with the factory springs.  Not sure on the ride quality in that situation.  You would have to drive both of our trucks back to back and see which one suits you.

Posted
On 2/2/2024 at 7:24 AM, calgator73 said:

I'll check it out when I get back see if I can find a tag or part number on the spring pack.  

Screenshot_20240322_224616_Gallery.thumb.jpg.57987c7e12a754473caaa198e2140d17.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...