Jump to content

2500HD vs 3500HD

Jason Hewitt
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jason Hewitt New Member

Jason Hewitt

Posted
Posted (edited)

Im getting A fifth wheel travel trailer next month. We are going to start camp hosting, so the truck will mostly be used to drive into town for supply runs.  The dry weight of the trailer is going to be about 14000 lbs.

I just wanting to know what the difference is between the 2500HD and the 3500HD SRW. im definitely going with the 6.6 duramax and the allison 10 speed. 

One dealer told me the only difference is one leaf spring in the rear. Not sure if that warrants another 20k to the price.

Edited by Jason Hewitt
add
Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted

Assuming the 2024 is the same as the 2020-2023 in these areas …

 

The price difference between similarly equipped 2500 and 3500s should be a few hundred dollars. 
 

The 3500 rear leaf spring pack has a second stage spring on the bottom that engages sooner than the second stage spring on a 2500. Contrary to what you will see in some threads, the main spring packs are different. You see that on an unloaded truck as a big difference in the gaps above the bottom spring in the spring pack. Also, the 3500 has a third stage separate spring and bumpers above the axle. Most people call this the overload springs. The 2500 does not have this third stage nor the hardware and bumpers for them on the frame.  Some have mentioned a trim option of the 2500 that has the 3500 spring configuration for 2024. 
 

Payload difference will be 600-800 lbs. 

 

The 3500 diesel has a larger rear differential gear set. I don’t think the 2500 diesel has it, but I could be wrong.  The gmc web site should tell you that. 

 

3500 forces you to get tow mirrors. Great when you need them, but block your view quite a bit when you don’t. 2500 it’s optional. 
 

The empty ride is noticeably more firm in the 3500 due to the spring difference but not horrible.  Lowering tire pressure makes a big difference. When you test drive, the dealer has everything at max pressure, so keep that in mind. 18s ride better than 20s in my opinion. 
 

What did I miss?

Shougham New Member

Shougham

Posted
Posted

I had a 2020 HD 2500 Diesel and also have a 12500lb 5th wheel. Loaded we were right at or a little over on payload. I traded for 2024 3500 HD mainly for the payload increase and Another Jr is correct about the ride both loaded and unloaded. Very happy with the upgrade

Ranger473 Enthusiast

Ranger473

Posted
Posted

I don't have experience with the 2500 but I sure like my 3500.  I sold my Ford F250 and bought the 3500.  

BuckWallace Enthusiast

BuckWallace

Posted
Posted

If you're towing that heavy of a 5th wheel then definitely get the 1-ton. Not sure where the extra $20k is coming from, though. Trucks with identical trim/features should only be about $1k different between a 2500 and 3500.

BuckWallace Enthusiast

BuckWallace

Posted
Posted (edited)

With average pin weight of 20-25% of the trailer weight, you're looking at around 2800-3500 lbs. My 1-ton SRW gasser has a payload of a little over 3900 lbs, so a diesel will have a few hundred less than that. Some people might even recommend a DRW...

Edited by BuckWallace
MTU Alum Enthusiast

MTU Alum

Posted
Posted

3500 will be the right choice.  It will give you some extra payload so you have to worry about being over GVW.

 

A 2500 max tow would be an option as well.  This is a re-badged 3500.

 

#iworkforGM

  • 4 weeks later...
BCGM Enthusiast

BCGM

Posted
Posted

Don't want to derail the Op's thread but if any of you have anything to add to my thread I started " 2500 in Canada " Please feel free to add 

Thank You !

chwilliams Enthusiast

chwilliams

Posted
Posted (edited)

Get a 3500 unless you need the lower numbers of the 2500 for some reason, like state licensing and/or tax stuff, and you don't have an already existing use case that's ok with the 2500's lower payload.

Edited by chwilliams
being pedantic
Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted

In some states the 3500 costs a lot less to license because its gvwr puts it in the commercial truck range. 

BCGM Enthusiast

BCGM

Posted
Posted

Not sure if this has been mentioned already but here goes .In my research to but a 2024 Chevrolet 2500 HD  is if you get the MAX TOW package on the 2500 it is the same as the 3500 . Automotive Inquiries has a video on You Tube concerning this . I think its the first one he does when he buys the Red 2500HD  Custom 

BigBru Enthusiast

BigBru

Posted
Posted

I checked with my insurance provider, a 3500 AT4  is $800 a year less in insurance than the same 2500.

I am in Canada though.

Another JR Senior Enthusiast

Another JR

Posted
Posted
On 2/26/2024 at 4:55 PM, chwilliams said:

Get a 3500 unless you need the lower numbers of the 2500 for some reason, like state licensing and/or tax stuff, and you don't have an already existing use case that's ok with the 2500's lower payload.

I think we’re kind of saying the same thing, but I’ll say it a little differently. Setting aside the licensing and insurance cost differences that may vary by location, I would not recommend simply defaulting to a 3500 because it has more payload capacity. The ride is noticeably stiffer on a 3500. If you know you don’t need the payload, a 2500 will be more comfortable. It’s worth taking a good look at your needs and deciding if you really need the extra stiffness and 600 or so lbs of extra payload rating. It sounds like the OP needs it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   6 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,706 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...