Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
36 minutes ago, Silverado4x4 said:

It has everything to do with speed on ETA. 

It has more to do with stops. It was a joke. When I traveled alone I always beat the ETA. I could travel 8 hours without stopping but once. I had a fuel tank in the back with a switch and a cooler with drinks and sandwiches. You get older you stop more often to stretch your legs and if you have your wife to use the restroom. Rest stops are quicker than fuel stops. After driving at least 50K miles a year for 40years I knew all the tricks for saving time. 

Posted
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

It has more to do with stops. It was a joke. When I traveled alone I always beat the ETA. I could travel 8 hours without stopping but once. I had a fuel tank in the back with a switch and a cooler with drinks and sandwiches. You get older you stop more often to stretch your legs and if you have your wife to use the restroom. Rest stops are quicker than fuel stops. After driving at least 50K miles a year for 40years I knew all the tricks for saving time. 


On a GPS, ETA (Estimated Time of Arrival) works by calculating the distance to your destination using satellite signals, then dividing that distance by your current speed, factoring in additional variables like traffic conditions, road types, and speed limits to provide an estimated time you will reach your destination; essentially, it's a prediction based on your current location, speed, and the planned route to your destination

Posted
1 hour ago, Silverado4x4 said:


On a GPS, ETA (Estimated Time of Arrival) works by calculating the distance to your destination using satellite signals, then dividing that distance by your current speed, factoring in additional variables like traffic conditions, road types, and speed limits to provide an estimated time you will reach your destination; essentially, it's a prediction based on your current location, speed, and the planned route to your destination

Dude. I use my GPS navigation at least twice a month. When I leave my house it’s says I will arrive at 2:30. When I have my wife with me I can add a half an hour because of stops. It will adjust because of those stops or traffic congestion. When I’m by myself I’m usually dead on or early. Is that really that hard for you to grasp? It’s a moving target. The fact that my wife is with me I already know to add a half an hour. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Dude. I use my GPS navigation at least twice a month. When I leave my house it’s says I will arrive at 2:30. When I have my wife with me I can add a half an hour because of stops. It will adjust because of those stops or traffic congestion. When I’m by myself I’m usually dead on or early. Is that really that hard for you to grasp? It’s a moving target. The fact that my wife is with me I already know to add a half an hour. 

If you haven’t figured it out, I was being funny. We’re both saying the same thing.

Posted
11 hours ago, KARNUT said:

It has more to do with stops. It was a joke. When I traveled alone I always beat the ETA. I could travel 8 hours without stopping but once. I had a fuel tank in the back with a switch and a cooler with drinks and sandwiches. You get older you stop more often to stretch your legs and if you have your wife to use the restroom. Rest stops are quicker than fuel stops. After driving at least 50K miles a year for 40years I knew all the tricks for saving time. 

 

You know that few drive slower than I do. And I've shown I have one of the faster average MPH figures when dividing miles by hours. Pepper stands at 42 mph and change on a national average of about 36 mph per FORD Commercial Services. So a bunch faster. I'm the fastest slow guy most know. 

 

Like you, it's seat time vs speed and seat time wins hands down. Prostrate will slow that a bit as a male ages. :crackup:

 

Decades ago I did an "Iron Butt Rally". Motorcycle challenge where win the patch you have to cover 1,000 miles in 24 hours or less. I did 1,056 miles in 22 hours and 6 minutes. Never broke 60 mph EVER for the trip. That is an average of 47.8 mph or 80% of top speed. That is allot of seat time on a bike. It would be fast in a car. Almost brutal on a Harley. Fall of 1977. 6 mph faster than Pepper. Now on that trip I had about a four hour breakdown so my seat time was 18 hours approximately or 55.55 mph or 93% of maximum speed. WHAT? I have NEVER been able to reproduce that ratio. I'll never be that young or that dumb again. :rollin: 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 10:34 AM, RyanbabZ71 said:

Indiana has the left lane is for passing only.  State police have and will pull people over slowing the flow of traffic

 

Kansas would have to give its cops tickets. (Citizen's arrest?)  In a former job, I used to be associated with State Troopers, County Sheriffs, and City Police Departments. All of them liked to play that game of staying in the left lane, setting their cruise control for 5 mph under the speed limit, stacking up traffic for miles behind them, and pouncing on anyone brave or dumb enough to pass them. 

Posted

🤣 Just kidding. I'd be the 93 year old driving 60 in a 40mph zone with "I Can't Drive 55" blaring on the stereo while young Officer Bob was writing my ticket. 

 

20241205_191602.jpg.e0d047652b934059e058d69ff59dc948.jpg

  • Haha 1
Posted

Here in Mass the state troopers own the left lane, always 70+mph, if you do not move over they will stop you

Posted
11 hours ago, richard wysong said:

Here in Mass the state troopers own the left lane, always 70+mph, if you do not move over they will stop you

That’s how it’s supposed to be. Left lane passing only. You’re supposed to match the speed of rear approaching traffic or get out of the way. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I had a neighbor that was a commercial carpet sales representative that had a company issued Silver Ford Crown Vic that he traveled all over NC in. His windows were tinted and he mounted an antenna on the trunk. He said he loved to set his cruise about 3 over the speed limit and ride the right lane. Cars would pile up behind him being afraid to pass him for fear of him being an LEO. He said even LEO's would wave at him when passing. I got a kick out of him telling me the story. May he RIP. 

 

I live in TX now and the left lanes are clearly marked "Left lane for passing only". Most comply but yet there are still morons that do not heed the sign. 

Edited by ManyCamaroz
Posted

I was following a state trooper last night in the right lane doing 50 in a 45. All of the sudden he slows to 30. I’m like WTH. All of the sudden a truck passes really going. Lights on he pulls the guy over. Happy New Year for you. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Out here it amazes me how many think it's 15 over the PSL is okay. I usually run 4-5 over the PSL on interstates and highways and haven't had any issues even when approaching LEO's. In and around town I'm at PSL or within 1-2. In the many small towns here in TX I maintain the PSL.

Edited by ManyCamaroz
  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/6/2024 at 1:47 PM, MaverickZ71 said:

🤣 Just kidding. I'd be the 93 year old driving 60 in a 40mph zone with "I Can't Drive 55" blaring on the stereo while young Officer Bob was writing my ticket. 

 

20241205_191602.jpg.e0d047652b934059e058d69ff59dc948.jpg

Where do you live? 😝

Posted
On 12/6/2024 at 2:47 PM, MaverickZ71 said:

🤣 Just kidding. I'd be the 93 year old driving 60 in a 40mph zone with "I Can't Drive 55" blaring on the stereo while young Officer Bob was writing my ticket. 

 

20241205_191602.jpg.e0d047652b934059e058d69ff59dc948.jpg

 

If that's what's making you late it ain't the guy ahead of you. :idiot: 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,079 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...