Jump to content

Which engine - 5.3, 6.2 or 3.0?

Z71RAD88
 Share

Recommended Posts

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
Posted

I'm moving forward with a new truck purchase in the next few weeks and struggling to decide which engine to go with. I live in CA and don't tow. Typically drive 20,000 per year. My typical commute is 35 miles each way with 90% country roads at 55 mph and freeway at 65 mph, a combo of the two. I do get up the mountains frequently so the extra torque from the 6.2 and 3.0 appease me. I do understand having the turbo will be helpful at elevation compare to a NA engine. 

 

I was initially all set on the 6.2 but with the recent notice from NHTSA, It's got me thinking twice. 

 

Never owned a diesel and don't feel overly confident I can feed it the proper/required diesel living in California. 

 

What would you all go with? Trim level wise going RST or LTZ. Deals seem to be better on the LTZ with the 3.0. 

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

newdude
newdude

Is it though?  I can reset my trip meter and drive 7 miles and get the same result.  That's not an accurate measurement of MPG, what it can achieve in a 7 mile stretch.        

Transient
Transient

I see that you ordered your truck before I was able to post my experience.  Imo, you made the right choice getting the 3.0 Duramax.  I have a 2020 with the 6.2 and lived in San Diego from 2020 to 2023

newdude
newdude

41mi.  Doesn't count.  Show us what you get on a tank or current lifetime MPG, that counts.  

Posted Images

N715DP Enthusiast

N715DP

Posted
Posted

I have a 3.0 and 16,000 miles later I am still amazed at the fuel efficiency over my 5.3 Avalanche I had previously.  I know gas prices are a different world on your side of the country but I ran a spreadsheet for almost 15,000 miles and came up with about 30% more cost efficient across all types of driving versus my Avalanche.  I see a roughly 50% increase in fuel economy so the 30% number takes into account the higher cost of diesel versus regular unleaded.  At typical highway speeds (I don't drive more than 70mph typically), I'm at more than 31mpg.  Around town is about 22mpg.  I know you mentioned not towing, but apples to apples towing, I was right on 50% more mpg with the same load over the same trip.

 

One thing I did not calculate is DEF usage but to be honest, it's so minimal of an expense that it's not worth factoring in.  

 

I think you'd find the fuel economy for your typical commute would be fantastic in the 3.0... I have the older 3.0 in my refreshed '22 and I've only heard that the newer is better in every way (including more power).

 

As for trim, I'm very happy with my Z71 RST, just enough bells and whistles without being a sticker shock situation.

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, N715DP said:

I have a 3.0 and 16,000 miles later I am still amazed at the fuel efficiency over my 5.3 Avalanche I had previously.  I know gas prices are a different world on your side of the country but I ran a spreadsheet for almost 15,000 miles and came up with about 30% more cost efficient across all types of driving versus my Avalanche.  I see a roughly 50% increase in fuel economy so the 30% number takes into account the higher cost of diesel versus regular unleaded.  At typical highway speeds (I don't drive more than 70mph typically), I'm at more than 31mpg.  Around town is about 22mpg.  I know you mentioned not towing, but apples to apples towing, I was right on 50% more mpg with the same load over the same trip.

 

One thing I did not calculate is DEF usage but to be honest, it's so minimal of an expense that it's not worth factoring in.  

 

I think you'd find the fuel economy for your typical commute would be fantastic in the 3.0... I have the older 3.0 in my refreshed '22 and I've only heard that the newer is better in every way (including more power).

 

As for trim, I'm very happy with my Z71 RST, just enough bells and whistles without being a sticker shock situation.

 

Thank you for your post! What kind of diesel do you have in PA? 

Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted

The 5.3 now and the 5.3 in your older Avalanche is not a good comparison in mpg. My 5.3 on a 650 mile trip got 25-27 mpg and around town it gets about 18- 20 mpg and iam not that easy on the peddle, yes the diesel will get a little better but you have to figure in the up charge for the diesel.

 

N715DP Enthusiast

N715DP

Posted
Posted

Standard ultra-low sulfur diesel is everywhere here (I think this is the same you'd have in CA).  In the winter, most stations switch to a winterized blend of #1 and #2 but I haven't noticed any difference in fuel economy or how the engine runs.  I typically fill up at one of the truck stops a few miles away as their prices are consistently less than your run-of-the-mill convenience store.  

 

 

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Silverado4x4 said:

The 5.3 now and the 5.3 in your older Avalanche is not a good comparison in mpg. My 5.3 on a 650 mile trip got 25-27 mpg and around town it gets about 18- 20 mpg and iam not that easy on the peddle, yes the diesel will get a little better but you have to figure in the up charge for the diesel.

 

 

What year Silverado do you have in your 5.3 and trim level? And I would agree, the 5.3 with the 10 speed is a night and day difference compare to the 2004 and 2012 I had. 

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, N715DP said:

Standard ultra-low sulfur diesel is everywhere here (I think this is the same you'd have in CA).  In the winter, most stations switch to a winterized blend of #1 and #2 but I haven't noticed any difference in fuel economy or how the engine runs.  I typically fill up at one of the truck stops a few miles away as their prices are consistently less than your run-of-the-mill convenience store.  

 

 

 

We have very few #2 diesel stations left in the state from my research. It's all bio or renewable diesel. The owners manual states you can run up to B20 but it's recommended to use a condition or fuel additive with it. 

Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted

My other 5.3 was a 2019 with the 8 speed and I replaced it with a 2025 5.3 with the 10 speed, the 2025 hasn't been on that trip yet so iam expecting a little more but honestly I don't worry about mpg.

N715DP Enthusiast

N715DP

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Z71RAD88 said:

 

We have very few #2 diesel stations left in the state from my research. It's all bio or renewable diesel. The owners manual states you can run up to B20 but it's recommended to use a condition or fuel additive with it. 

Hooray for the People's Republic of California! 🤣

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, PunchT37 said:

My ‘25 LT 2wd 5.3 with 3.42 gears has done this, at least at times. 
 

 

E36D1F76-2641-419B-94D2-A9312AF38EE2.jpeg

 

Wow. Impressive. Thanks for sharing. 

redwngr Senior Enthusiast

redwngr

Posted
Posted

My '23 3.0L has done this -- for 28,000 miles. 

This is all fuel used. 

Hand calc numbers are a little better than the DIC numbers. 

Lifetime average is at 29.2 usmpg.

 

image.png.9ccd2c72c11b3124374136aeb977b378.png

Z71RAD88 Enthusiast

Z71RAD88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, redwngr said:

My '23 3.0L has done this -- for 28,000 miles. 

This is all fuel used. 

Hand calc numbers are a little better than the DIC numbers. 

Lifetime average is at 29.2 usmpg.

 

image.png.9ccd2c72c11b3124374136aeb977b378.png

 

The 3.0 fuel mileage is absolutely unreal. Glad GM still has this as an offering in the half ton market. 

Z45 Senior Enthusiast

Z45

Posted
Posted

My last 3 trucks, '12, 17 and 21 were all 6.2l.  My 2024 I got the 3.0L diesel for the fuel economy.  I have 2 friend who bought earlier versions, 2020 and a 2021, both GMC's and they tell me no complaints. Granted this owners have kept their trucks stock, no suspension lifts or big tires. Like me they have them for basic transportation.

 

 

2024 GMC Sierra Denali Window Stikcer.pdf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Joke Thread

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      A little girl said her prayers every night before bed and she asked G d to watch after each person she loved. One night she forgot to pray for her babysitter and her babysitter died. A few days later she forgot to pray for someone else and they died. The next night she forgot to pray for her dad. The next morning her dad was terrified. A bus almost crashed into him. He almost fell off a fifty foot ladder and almost wrecked on the way home. When he arrived home, he said I had a terrible day. His wife replied, “You think you had a bad day? My aerobics teacher died during class.
    • Jsdirt
      What did you do to your "other" car (aka musclecar) today

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Nice! I had one here, once. The car dealer I used to haul for stopped by with it. That was over 10 years ago now. Those are SUPER rare these days, especially up here! Never even see them at car shows anymore.   https://postimg.cc/0rvcNZ1W
    • KARNUT
      What did you do to your "other" car (aka musclecar) today

      By KARNUT · Posted

      I remember watching one of the auctions on TV. It just happened that they had two little red express trucks. My brother bought one new in 1979, still has it. So I hung on to watch them cross. The retro redone example brought more bids and went for more money than the original one did. My brother has redone his 3 times and raced it. He’s now in the process of making more tame for cruising. 
    • Jsdirt
      What did you do to your "other" car (aka musclecar) today

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      I always upgraded the suspension and steering components - bushings and ball joints, and had older cars that I could out-corner ANY modern car with. I used to be able to take my '78 Cutlass on off-ramps at stupid speeds and make the sharp MA corners without even squealing the tires. So much fun. My '72 El Camino must've had work done by the previous owner, since that thing seemed to handle even better than the '78.   I think the suspension & steering on the '72 was much more advanced than the '64, so that probably just made a good system even better.   I'm the same way with vehicles. I hate having to worry about the paint on my '93 W250 Cummins. I'm not used to that, lol.   https://postimg.cc/mzKr55sY
    • Jsdirt
      What did you do to your "other" car (aka musclecar) today

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      BEAUTIFUL!! That a Cutlass F85? Or 442? My side-ID skills are lacking thanks to failing memory, lol. Love that color & year, too!   Yeah I was never big on entering my own stuff, but I always liked seeing what everyone had, the rare models, and what's been modified. That was always fun. These days I have barely enough time to do what needs to be done at home.    Oddly enough, here in MA there are more car shows than ever in history! You'd think up here it would be dead, but it's bigger than EVER!          Took the 940 for its maiden voyage with the carburetor. At first I couldn't get out of the yard! This originally had the "Bosch" system (our other 940 has Regina - single fuel pump in fuel tank, and space-age-looking ignition coil on driver's fender) - that has dual fuel pumps. One in the tank, and one under the center left of the vehicle. I had unplugged the external one thinking I wouldn't need it with the carburetor ... but the way I have the pressure regulator hooked up, 90% of the fuel volume is going back to the fuel tank, so cranked all the way down, the regulator is only supplying a hair above 3.5 PSI to the carb. Turns out the in-tank pump (15 PSI alone, instead of 45) couldn't handle the load. Plugged it back in and went for a rip. Ran great!   Throttle response is always amazing with carburetors. ZERO delay that no FI system can reproduce. Also fires up in half the crank rotations as before. Low end power was DRAMATICALLY improved. There was an ongoing lean issue with the FI that I got tired of figuring out, so this is a MASSIVE improvement! Above 50 MPH on hills it feels SUPER weak, though. This is more than likely due to the timing not being advanced enough by the computer, since it believes there are multiple failures. I can live with that through the winter. Will keep me from passing slowpokes where I shouldn't and getting speeding tickets at least. 😁

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...