Jump to content

What To Do?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an '07 Denali that is burning oil, and has piston slap that seems to be getting worse. I was waiting for Ford to release a new Navigator, but it looks like that will not be happening for a while. I don't want a Mercedes, or a BMW due to the fact they require high maintenance, and they become a nightmare after 100K.

 

Decided I want to trade in my truck for an '06 Denali XL. I have done my research, and it seems like the GMT-800 platform is far more reliable than the 900.

 

My question is this:

 

Should I mention the oil burning/piston slap to the salesmen when I trade my truck in? How much would it hurt my truck's value?

 

Edit: Does anybody know when they started using the crappy AFM in the 6.2L engines?

Posted
it seems like the GMT-800 platform is far more reliable than the 900

 

Instead of the "show me the carfax" show me the data. I dont buy it. Look at all the steering shaft complaints on the GMT-800's. Engine knocking was another big issue. I had more recalls on my 2000 (2 or 3 not major but still) than on my 08 Tahoe and 10 Silverado combined (ZERO)

 

The AFM 6.2 is only used in the SUV's, the pickup 6.2 does not have AFM.

 

Also you can tune your vehicle and have AFM removed.

Posted

I didn't get a recall on my 1999 GMT800 till like 05 or 06..... And then it was just the tailgate straps... Then the brake pipe (tubing).... They replaced the straps and checked the brake pipe tubing.....

 

190k on the odometer, Engine is a tight as ever. Holds 60psi off idle and 40ish on idle..... Doesn't smoke and usually on 3-4k on an oil change its still at the top of the cross hatches on the stick.

 

I put one water pump on it and it was not bad... Just didn't want to just change a gasket (which was leaking).

 

Thought the transmission was going out, only to find a shift solenoid puked..... I'm going to sympathy build it in a few weeks, since before the solenoid puked I had already got a deluxe kit, converter, reaction shell, solenoid kit, wiring harness, planets, and sprags....... Ended up taking a 800 mile trip in it after I put the solenoid in......

 

If I had a chance to buy another new 1999 GMC Sierra like mine, I would to it in a heart beat, with out flinching.

 

Jbo

 

edit: and the steering shaft..... I think I paid 58 bucks might have even been 48...... 15 minutes it was in toooo...

Posted

If you buy a GMT-800 make sure the motor is cold when you start it up. And if the outside temperature is cool,better yet. When I bought my 2000 it sounded quiet with no piston slap,rod knock etc... After I bought the truck home and started it cold, the motor noises scared the H out of me. It has excellent oil pressure. And when I change the oil I have never seen any metal debris on the magnetic pan plug. Yet I'd swear that there is a rod bearing going. The only time it is quiet now is when the motor is fully warmed up,and that takes a while. I now know why it was parked outside the salesman's door when they were expecting me. Lol They must of been starting it on and off to keep the motor warm.

Posted
Should I mention the oil burning/piston slap to the salesmen when I trade my truck in?

 

After several years and several dealers telling me that the piston slap in my trucks was "normal", I certainly felt no obligation to inform them of this "normal" condition at trade-in-time.

Posted
Decided I want to trade in my truck for an '06 Denali XL. I have done my research, and it seems like the GMT-800 platform is far more reliable than the 900.

 

My question is this:

 

Should I mention the oil burning/piston slap to the salesmen when I trade my truck in? How much would it hurt my truck's value?

 

Edit: Does anybody know when they started using the crappy AFM in the 6.2L engines?

 

I don't believe that for a second. I've owned both and by far (IMO) the 900's the better truck all around. With that said, GM doesn't feel that piston slap is an issue, so other than sounding like a diesel, it's a non issue. Using oil, thats another issue. Again, GM doesn't see using a quart in 3000 miles is an issue either but I personally disagree. Piston slap was/is in the 800 platforms too. Mostly the 5.3 and 6.0's. I see no need to mention either issue when trading since GM doesn't see either an issue.

 

As stated above, the with the 6.2L, AFM was in the SUV's and not the trucks.

Posted
The AFM 6.2 is only used in the SUV's, the pickup 6.2 does not have AFM.

 

Also you can tune your vehicle and have AFM removed.

 

 

Hey guys, sorry for my lack of knowledge but what does AFM stand for, what does it do, what is it meeded for. Also what benefits are there of having AFM removed???

 

 

My 07 Yukon Denali XL also has piston slap more in the cold weather. I am not impressed with that, quality of the 20" chrome wheels, fake wood trim. Other than that it is a solid, comfortable, beautiful looking SUV that turns heads.

Posted
Should I mention the oil burning/piston slap to the salesmen when I trade my truck in?

 

After several years and several dealers telling me that the piston slap in my trucks was "normal", I certainly felt no obligation to inform them of this "normal" condition at trade-in-time.

 

 

 

Lol can't blame you there.

Posted

AFM = active fuel management

 

Basically in short it takes your V-8 vehicle and turns 4 cylinders off in certain situations. So you run on 4 cylinders or 8. They added it for better gas milage.

Posted

remember technology is only improves...i dont see people going back to VCRs because they got a bad blu ray player....nothing is perfect and you bought the first gen of the 900s series which is almost certainly going have bugs...i'm happy with my 800 but even if i wasent i sure as hell woulden't be going to try to trade for a 400

Posted
remember technology is only improves...i dont see people going back to VCRs because they got a bad blu ray player....nothing is perfect and you bought the first gen of the 900s series which is almost certainly going have bugs...i'm happy with my 800 but even if i wasent i sure as hell woulden't be going to try to trade for a 400

 

Exactly, be happy with what you got, remove the afm stuff if you don't like it. :thumbs: A lot of people would kill to get a 6.2 in their hands, ya know?

Posted
remember technology is only improves...i dont see people going back to VCRs because they got a bad blu ray player....nothing is perfect and you bought the first gen of the 900s series which is almost certainly going have bugs...i'm happy with my 800 but even if i wasent i sure as hell woulden't be going to try to trade for a 400

remember they continue to look for ways to make everything cheaper too. thinner metal, less convenience features, all about the almighty buck.

Posted
it seems like the GMT-800 platform is far more reliable than the 900

 

Instead of the "show me the carfax" show me the data. I dont buy it. Look at all the steering shaft complaints on the GMT-800's. Engine knocking was another big issue. I had more recalls on my 2000 (2 or 3 not major but still) than on my 08 Tahoe and 10 Silverado combined (ZERO)

 

The AFM 6.2 is only used in the SUV's, the pickup 6.2 does not have AFM.

 

Also you can tune your vehicle and have AFM removed.

 

 

But the AFM lifters, which are the primary cause of oil use, stay whether you turn the AFM off, or not.

Posted
I don't want a Mercedes, or a BMW due to the fact they require high maintenance, and they become a nightmare after 100K.

 

I agree 100%.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...