Jump to content

Gmt-900 Next To Gmt-400


RyanbabZ71

Recommended Posts

Posted

Last weekend went to a pumpkin patch. A GMT-400 parked next to me and I snapped a few photos. Sorry for the quality (Iphone + early morning lighting). I think the 98 model is my favorite looking pickups. Wish they had all the ammenities the new ones have and I might own one.

IMG_0550.JPG

IMG_0550.JPG

IMG_0550.JPG

IMG_0550.JPG

Posted

few more that wouldnt upload in previous post

IMG_0551.JPG

IMG_0538.JPG

IMG_0551.JPG

IMG_0538.JPG

IMG_0551.JPG

IMG_0538.JPG

IMG_0551.JPG

IMG_0538.JPG

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

That is really cool to look at the differences. My first truck was a '95 ext. cab Z71 and if it would have been a vortec I would have never gotten rid of it. They are my favorite body style hands down and the platform is just bulletproof, well with the exception of intake gaskets. I hope I can one day restore one to resemble my first with a 383 stroker vortec instead of the old TBI 350.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

It did surprise me how much bigger my 06 is compared to the 1990. You would think SCLB=ECSB, but it is longer, and I think wider as well. Grille guard is around 80 inches end to end

Posted

Heres my 400 beside my 900 when I went to pick up my new truck.post-87526-0-09696400-1322407348_thumb.jpg

I agree the 900 does dwarf the 400 in all aspects. Interior, exterior, suspension, drive train etc.....

Posted

Heres my 400 beside my 900 when I went to pick up my new truck.IMG00049.jpg

I agree the 900 does dwarf the 400 in all aspects. Interior, exterior, suspension, drive train etc.....

 

 

wow thats a pretty big upgrade

 

 

 

the 900's are sooo much wider then the 400's

Posted

Heres my 400 beside my 900 when I went to pick up my new truck.post-87526-0-09696400-1322407348_thumb.jpg

I agree the 900 does dwarf the 400 in all aspects. Interior, exterior, suspension, drive train etc.....

 

 

wow thats a pretty big upgrade

 

 

 

the 900's are sooo much wider then the 400's

 

Yah! your right it was the heck of an upgrade, but I had the old truck for a while and others almost like it so it was time to move up and something large enough for the family.

Posted

Its amazing how you can tell the new ones are more aerodynamic. They are more rounded at the top of the cab area

Posted

I also love the GMT400 i would love to own a 97,98 chevy z71 5.7l vortec ext cab or crew. These trucks with the two tone paint are awesome.

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 4,147 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...