Jump to content

Proposed Ban. NHTSA.


unit731

Recommended Posts

Posted

The National Transportation Safety Board is calling for the first-ever nationwide ban on drivers' use of smartphones, iPods and other personal electronic devices while behind the wheel. The recommendation also includes banning "hands-free" phone devices.

 

The safety recommendation specifically calls for the 50 states and the District of Columbia to ban the "nonemergency use of portable electronic devices, other than those designed to support the driving task, for all drivers." Many states already have such a ban.

 

 

LINK

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Heard about this. Honestly on the fence regarding my feelings about it. I talk on the phone when I drive, but most often I have my bluetooth earbud in. And I've shot quick texts out while sitting at a red light. So I'm in favor of certain communication functions while on the road. But I do hate it when people cruise at 70mph with the phone up to their ear chatting away, or texting. That's especially dangerous to motorcycles!!

Posted

I'm normally against any restrictive legislation but this cell phone and texting while driving is out of hand. I would rather have to deal with drunk drivers. At least the drunk drivers usually are trying to watch the road.....

Posted

This gets messy. What about slapping at your kids in the backseat? Or... turning up the radio loud? Or... arguing with the wife about absolutely nothing... again... while barreling down the road. Or... on, and on, and on. I think the bigger problem is with kids doing *anything* while driving. I'd like to see the stats for wrecks caused by 40-somethings talking on a phone, vs putting groups of 2 to 4 teenagers into cars with no electronic distractions at all. As for texting, sorry... but nobody can text and drive at the same time without losing track, although it's crazy to watch a kid type out whole messages with their thumb and barely look at the screen.

 

Since I don't text/drive, and dislike phones with a passion... I'd be happy to see it banned. We'd be a little safer, and I wouldn't miss it at all.

Posted

Doesn't matter what laws they pass. People will do what the see as ok. Who always does the speed limit? Some people can multi-task and some can't. The only sad part is when someone who can't multi-task kills someone else. If they only harm themselves than it would be fine.

Posted

On August 5, 2010, on a section of Interstate 44 in Gray Summit, Missouri, a pickup truck ran into the back of a truck-tractor that had slowed due to an active construction zone. The pickup truck, in turn, was struck from behind by a school bus. That school bus was then hit by a second school bus that had been following. As a result, two people died and 38 others were injured.

The NTSB's investigation revealed that the pickup driver sent and received 11 text messages in the 11 minutes preceding the accident. The last text was received moments before the pickup struck the truck-tractor.

 

So was the school bus driver texting or talking on the phone??? How about the second school bus?

 

It couldnt have been because they were following to closely???

Posted

There getting a little out of hand with wanting to ban hands free devices and Ipods.

 

 

what about Bluetooth that's BUILT INTO The Vehicle, What about GM's Personal Audio Link, where you can CONTROL The iPod through the VEHICLE'S Radio!? and what about Ford's Sync and MyFord/LincolnTouch, Chrysler's UConnect, or Toyota's Entune Infotainment systems!?! what about ONSTAR!?! ARE THEY GOING TO BAN THOSE TOO!?! :rant:

Posted

I'm normally against any restrictive legislation but this cell phone and texting while driving is out of hand. I would rather have to deal with drunk drivers. At least the drunk drivers usually are trying to watch the road.....

 

 

Drunks may be TRYING to watch the road, but texters are not. Both are dangerous in my book. None more than the other, except texters are momentarily distracted while drunks are constantly a hazard while driving. But like SouthCo said, people are always going to do stupid stuff no matter what laws are on the books. That is why I have a job and always will :)

Posted

Might as well pull the radio out of the vehilce too. I toatally understand the concerns but if you are going to take away all handheld devices then you should not be able to drink, listen to music, change radio stations, adjust your seat, mirrors, or anything else that takes your vision or mind off the road for a second. It IS NOT the devices that are killing people, it is the morons who cannot use them responsibly.

 

Give me a friggin break government. Pretty soon I'm going to have rules about taking a dump in my own house.

Posted

Might as well pull the radio out of the vehilce too. I toatally understand the concerns but if you are going to take away all handheld devices then you should not be able to drink, listen to music, change radio stations, adjust your seat, mirrors, or anything else that takes your vision or mind off the road for a second. It IS NOT the devices that are killing people, it is the morons who cannot use them responsibly.

 

Give me a friggin break government. Pretty soon I'm going to have rules about taking a dump in my own house.

 

 

 

Calm down.

 

There is nothing to worry about inside your home unless you are creating a health hazard or doing something that the authorities determine to be suspicious.

 

Nothing to worry about at all.

 

 

LINK

Posted

Might as well pull the radio out of the vehilce too. I toatally understand the concerns but if you are going to take away all handheld devices then you should not be able to drink, listen to music, change radio stations, adjust your seat, mirrors, or anything else that takes your vision or mind off the road for a second. It IS NOT the devices that are killing people, it is the morons who cannot use them responsibly.

 

Give me a friggin break government. Pretty soon I'm going to have rules about taking a dump in my own house.

 

 

 

Calm down.

 

There is nothing to worry about inside your home unless you are creating a health hazard or doing something that the authorities determine to be suspicious.

 

Nothing to worry about at all.

 

 

LINK

 

 

That was a joke, I'm not paranoid whatsoever. My point with the statement above that is where does this end? Will we now lose radios in our vehicles because they are a distraction, will the government require all hands free equipment to be disabled from factory vehicles?

 

Just like with seat belt laws. They went as far as to put a chime in my truck to tell me to put my belt on, even if I am driving around on the farm and DO NOT need one on. If you don't want to wear a belt then that is your choice, just like a helmet on a motorcycle, not someone else's choice for you. You would be dumb to not wear one though, just saying.

Posted

They can ban whatever they want, no way I'll stop talking to someone if I have to. Just like any other law of the road, I'll do what I need to do to get through my day and I'll deal with the fallout if I'm stopped. It is BS though because it's the damn feds who pushed handsfree laws in the beginning and now they want nothing at all. Sorry but no. And I'm about as averse to talking or texting as one can get so it's not like I'm always on the phone. If I'm talking to someone it's because I need to. If conditions warrant I will stop and pull off the road but more often than not (especially with bluetooth) I absolutely can drive and talk without any risk.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,925
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    btm
    Newest Member
    btm
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,458 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Here's the second UOA on my 22 Wrangler with the Ecodiesel. This has 5k miles on AMSOIL Signature Series DEO 5w-40. The first one was dealer installed oil, no clue what it was, the second is what AMSOIL recommended, European FS 5w-40, Most of the Ecodiesel world is showing great results using the European MS 5w-40, I figured I would see how the DEO works. This is using an Ecoguard oil filter. It's my understanding this engine likes to shed aluminum.  We will see. So far I don't think this is too bad.    
    • I'm surprised nobody seems to offer a solution like the start/stop device I put in my new truck. Remembers my setting when shutdown. And while it still starts up in start/stop, it stores/evaluates what mode it was in when shut down and will change it whithin a second or 2 of startup. It'd be nice to have something like that for the DRLs.
    • 2015 Sierra 1500 here. Leaks from the sunroof to front driver side and soaks carpet. How do I fix this? Thanks!
    • I will be doing that for sure, but I need to solve who has/ where I can find a bidirectional scan tool that will support OBD 1.5. I'm kicking myself because I ebay'ed a Snap On MT2500 that I didn't think I'd ever need anymore. D'oh!! I'd rather not buy another, so I'll contact a few local shops to see if they have one and how much they'd want to do the procedure. I'd rather have the ability to do it myself... I wish there was a modern tool that could do it all, but I'd have no idea what to buy.   The theory with the pulled timing is that it mimics a rich condition. The delayed spark causes incomplete burn and the O2 sensor picks up low oxygen levels. That's interpreted as a rich condition so the PCM pulls fuel and that shows up in the deeply negative fuel trims.
    • An ultra wealthy man had the most beautiful daughter. But, there was a problem. Everything she touched would melt in her hands. No matter what, Metal, Wood, Stone. Anything she touched would melt. She could not feed herself. Because of this, men were afraid of her. Nobody would dare marry her. Her father was despaired. What could he do to help his daughter? He consulted doctors, scientists and anybody who could solve this problem. Finally one of them said, "If your daughter touches one thing that does not melt in her hands, she will be cured." He was overjoyed and came up with a plan. The next day, he held a competition. Any man who could bring his daughter an object that would not melt in her hands would be given billions of dollars to marry her. Three extremely intelligent and handsome young men took up the challenge. The first brought a very heavy steel rod, But alas, when the she touched it, it completely melted in a matter of seconds. He sadly went away. The second brought a beautiful diamond, knowing diamonds were one of the hardest substance in the world and would not melt. But alas, once she held it in her hand, it melted. He too was sent away disappointed. So now, there was one left He was very nervous & sweating. He approached the daughter & said, “put your hand in my pants pocket and feel what is in there." She did exactly what he asked. She felt something very hard. She held it in her hand, squeezing it as hard as she could. It did not melt & remained extremely hard. Her father was overjoyed. Everybody was overjoyed. She was finally cured. Nothing never, ever melted in her hand again. They married and they both lived happily ever after, raising a wonderful family. Question: What was in the the groom’s pants pocket??? Answer below ↓ M&Ms of course! They melt in your mouth, not in your hand. What on earth were you thinking?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...