Jump to content

Proposed Ban. NHTSA.


unit731

Recommended Posts

Posted

The National Transportation Safety Board is calling for the first-ever nationwide ban on drivers' use of smartphones, iPods and other personal electronic devices while behind the wheel. The recommendation also includes banning "hands-free" phone devices.

 

The safety recommendation specifically calls for the 50 states and the District of Columbia to ban the "nonemergency use of portable electronic devices, other than those designed to support the driving task, for all drivers." Many states already have such a ban.

 

 

LINK

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Heard about this. Honestly on the fence regarding my feelings about it. I talk on the phone when I drive, but most often I have my bluetooth earbud in. And I've shot quick texts out while sitting at a red light. So I'm in favor of certain communication functions while on the road. But I do hate it when people cruise at 70mph with the phone up to their ear chatting away, or texting. That's especially dangerous to motorcycles!!

Posted

I'm normally against any restrictive legislation but this cell phone and texting while driving is out of hand. I would rather have to deal with drunk drivers. At least the drunk drivers usually are trying to watch the road.....

Posted

This gets messy. What about slapping at your kids in the backseat? Or... turning up the radio loud? Or... arguing with the wife about absolutely nothing... again... while barreling down the road. Or... on, and on, and on. I think the bigger problem is with kids doing *anything* while driving. I'd like to see the stats for wrecks caused by 40-somethings talking on a phone, vs putting groups of 2 to 4 teenagers into cars with no electronic distractions at all. As for texting, sorry... but nobody can text and drive at the same time without losing track, although it's crazy to watch a kid type out whole messages with their thumb and barely look at the screen.

 

Since I don't text/drive, and dislike phones with a passion... I'd be happy to see it banned. We'd be a little safer, and I wouldn't miss it at all.

Posted

Doesn't matter what laws they pass. People will do what the see as ok. Who always does the speed limit? Some people can multi-task and some can't. The only sad part is when someone who can't multi-task kills someone else. If they only harm themselves than it would be fine.

Posted

On August 5, 2010, on a section of Interstate 44 in Gray Summit, Missouri, a pickup truck ran into the back of a truck-tractor that had slowed due to an active construction zone. The pickup truck, in turn, was struck from behind by a school bus. That school bus was then hit by a second school bus that had been following. As a result, two people died and 38 others were injured.

The NTSB's investigation revealed that the pickup driver sent and received 11 text messages in the 11 minutes preceding the accident. The last text was received moments before the pickup struck the truck-tractor.

 

So was the school bus driver texting or talking on the phone??? How about the second school bus?

 

It couldnt have been because they were following to closely???

Posted

There getting a little out of hand with wanting to ban hands free devices and Ipods.

 

 

what about Bluetooth that's BUILT INTO The Vehicle, What about GM's Personal Audio Link, where you can CONTROL The iPod through the VEHICLE'S Radio!? and what about Ford's Sync and MyFord/LincolnTouch, Chrysler's UConnect, or Toyota's Entune Infotainment systems!?! what about ONSTAR!?! ARE THEY GOING TO BAN THOSE TOO!?! :rant:

Posted

I'm normally against any restrictive legislation but this cell phone and texting while driving is out of hand. I would rather have to deal with drunk drivers. At least the drunk drivers usually are trying to watch the road.....

 

 

Drunks may be TRYING to watch the road, but texters are not. Both are dangerous in my book. None more than the other, except texters are momentarily distracted while drunks are constantly a hazard while driving. But like SouthCo said, people are always going to do stupid stuff no matter what laws are on the books. That is why I have a job and always will :)

Posted

Might as well pull the radio out of the vehilce too. I toatally understand the concerns but if you are going to take away all handheld devices then you should not be able to drink, listen to music, change radio stations, adjust your seat, mirrors, or anything else that takes your vision or mind off the road for a second. It IS NOT the devices that are killing people, it is the morons who cannot use them responsibly.

 

Give me a friggin break government. Pretty soon I'm going to have rules about taking a dump in my own house.

Posted

Might as well pull the radio out of the vehilce too. I toatally understand the concerns but if you are going to take away all handheld devices then you should not be able to drink, listen to music, change radio stations, adjust your seat, mirrors, or anything else that takes your vision or mind off the road for a second. It IS NOT the devices that are killing people, it is the morons who cannot use them responsibly.

 

Give me a friggin break government. Pretty soon I'm going to have rules about taking a dump in my own house.

 

 

 

Calm down.

 

There is nothing to worry about inside your home unless you are creating a health hazard or doing something that the authorities determine to be suspicious.

 

Nothing to worry about at all.

 

 

LINK

Posted

Might as well pull the radio out of the vehilce too. I toatally understand the concerns but if you are going to take away all handheld devices then you should not be able to drink, listen to music, change radio stations, adjust your seat, mirrors, or anything else that takes your vision or mind off the road for a second. It IS NOT the devices that are killing people, it is the morons who cannot use them responsibly.

 

Give me a friggin break government. Pretty soon I'm going to have rules about taking a dump in my own house.

 

 

 

Calm down.

 

There is nothing to worry about inside your home unless you are creating a health hazard or doing something that the authorities determine to be suspicious.

 

Nothing to worry about at all.

 

 

LINK

 

 

That was a joke, I'm not paranoid whatsoever. My point with the statement above that is where does this end? Will we now lose radios in our vehicles because they are a distraction, will the government require all hands free equipment to be disabled from factory vehicles?

 

Just like with seat belt laws. They went as far as to put a chime in my truck to tell me to put my belt on, even if I am driving around on the farm and DO NOT need one on. If you don't want to wear a belt then that is your choice, just like a helmet on a motorcycle, not someone else's choice for you. You would be dumb to not wear one though, just saying.

Posted

They can ban whatever they want, no way I'll stop talking to someone if I have to. Just like any other law of the road, I'll do what I need to do to get through my day and I'll deal with the fallout if I'm stopped. It is BS though because it's the damn feds who pushed handsfree laws in the beginning and now they want nothing at all. Sorry but no. And I'm about as averse to talking or texting as one can get so it's not like I'm always on the phone. If I'm talking to someone it's because I need to. If conditions warrant I will stop and pull off the road but more often than not (especially with bluetooth) I absolutely can drive and talk without any risk.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...