Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I doubt one size larger would be worth the money....

 

Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted (edited)

I came late from the office today.... and Now tomorrow and day after tomorrow It is holiday and I am thinking to go for a long drive with my husband... After That I will go to workshop because I am feeling some problem gear box...

Edited by mviinc
  • Like 1
Posted

33s and 3.73 is fine 4.10s are what you'd need for 35s

 

sent from my truck in a field

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Sorry for all the pic's yall!! Got the title in hand she's all mine! Pretty good spring break for me :))

A2CB4824-0C82-4F3C-A960-7AE679F9B5F8_zps

 

6C13E025-448D-4D28-80F6-2B0FA49387E0_zps

 

 

75BB9509-ACF5-4F92-8CE5-50AF036D568A_zps

 

 

491D5EE7-6437-4CAC-B541-B5C1044C68E9_zps

Posted
You must be used to being slow Sarah, 3.73 is the lowest I'd go on stock tires lol

 

I didn't pick my stock gears..

 

sent from my truck in a field

 

 

Posted (edited)

i Have 33s and by all means not slow a tad sluggish but the truck performs fine

 

sent from my truck in a field

 

Edited by SarahsGMC
Posted

My buddy had a k5 with a 305 and stock gears with some 36x15.5s yall dont even know the definition of slow haha

Posted (edited)
My buddy had a k5 with a 305 and stock gears with some 36x15.5s yall dont even know the definition of slow haha

My 1990 with 160 horse wasn't the fastest. :lol: I want to buy 2 LQ9's eventually, one for my 2006, one for the ol 1990. Giggity

 

Why no minivan in that pic Ryan?

Edited by kstruckcountry
  • Like 1
Posted

It's out of town garage is 100% chevy for a few days

 

 

Ryan

Posted
You must be used to being slow Sarah, 3.73 is the lowest I'd go on stock tires lol

 

Depending on the tranny. But for a 60e I will have to agree

 

Sent while drinkin' a cold one...

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...