Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I took her to Costco today to get a nail removed from the right rear, luckily I caught it in time and didn't lose any air pressure. It would have sucked to get a flat out on the road!

 

And I don't know how long this has been going on but today I noticed quick puffs of white smoke for about 5 seconds upon starting her up. Although it didn't happen every single time either so I suppose that's comforting. Thoughts?

Posted

Finally installed my front floor LED lighting.....I was planning on doing the rear seat also but I have LED's in my dome light and they provide enough light to see clearly on the rear floor.

 

71dd0ed670b7e4518170ebcf83002fe3.jpg

I like it. Very nice touch
  • Like 1
Posted

.....

 

And I don't know how long this has been going on but today I noticed quick puffs of white smoke for about 5 seconds upon starting her up. Although it didn't happen every single time either so I suppose that's comforting. Thoughts?

I know it can't be from cold weather, especially in dry AZ (and especially the Phoenix area if that's where your at), so it's probably a head gasket just starting to weep. Coolant is the only thing that produces white smoke.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Definitely possible, but that area of the country is extremely dry compared to up here. While I always see water dripping from tailpipes on any car/truck with a cat, I never see just a brief blast of white when starting - even on really humid, cold mornings. Up here in the spring, fall, and winter, after the vehicle is running 10 seconds or more, a constant white fog will come out. That's just warm moist air meeting cold air and condensing into droplets. Colder it is outside, the longer and thicker the fog.

 

I've seen a brief blue blast from my truck starting around 50k miles, but an oil catch can has totally eliminated that. It's possible you have just a small bit of coolant leaking into one or more cylinders over time - not enough to happen when the engine is hot. In that case rather than go through the trouble of yanking the heads and all that, I'd just dump some K-Seal or Bars Leak in the radiator and call it a day.

 

Are you in the valley, or up in the mountains?

Edited by Jsdirt
  • Like 1
Posted

I'm in the valley.

 

And I'm definitely not pulling apart the engine for something this insignificant, especially when she's at 234k miles. Haha

 

Ideally I want to get her out of regular rotation in year or so. Although the process has slowly begun this summer since she has only been used for getting to work and short road trips, otherwise we use the Versa for everything else. I even left her at home today since the wife probably isn't going out.

Posted (edited)

Ahh gotcha. In the valley, your even less likely to see any kind of natural condensate on startup.

 

I'd do the stop leak treatment in your case. You'll probably get another 10 years out of it (or more!) down there, since you don't have to deal with the rust issues. Sounds like it's a very small leak that only happens when the engine is cool - this stuff will work great in that case.

 

I've had really great results with K-Seal - blue bottle with orange label.

 

http://www.amazon.com/K-Seal-ST5501-Purpose-Permanent-Coolant/dp/B001QT9KO6

 

 

Back in the day, I used to use Alumaseal - that stuff plugged a 1/8" hole in a radiator in my '78 Cutlass for over 3 years! Never leaked again! Also fixed a leak in my '86 Grand Marquis heater core - didn't feel like tearing the dash out to fix it. 13 years and it's still holding. Problem is, they changed the formulation last I saw - last time I used it, it SUCKED. Used to be made right near you in Scottsdale, but now it's made in a different location that I can't remember at the moment. Must've sold the formulation, then the new guys cheaped out on it. Par for the course today ....

Edited by Jsdirt
Posted (edited)

Last nights project was installing my low beam HID's. Thought it would be a really simple job but I had to remove the grille to get at the lights.

6000K 35W low beams with LED fog bulbs. I have HID's for the fogs, just didn't get them installed yet.

 

1f2ee3dcf664076bcda896a37a7c5183.jpg

 

Can see much better than with the OEM bulbs.

Had to readjust the aim though, don't want to be a hazzard blinding other drivers. They

Also removed both DRL fuses so my ballasts last longer. The constant on/off isn't good for HID's. They also don't like the lower power that comes with DRL's.

 

Sent from my crappy iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Edited by BlackZ71Silverado
  • Like 1
Posted

That was the very first mod I did to my truck (yanking DRL fuses) - the second it got home from the showroom floor. I hate how I have to hold the switch to the off position every time I start the truck inside the garage - otherwise the light sensor triggers the lights.

 

I might have to look into those HID's for mine. We installed them in our '86 Grand Marquis with excellent results. The lights on the Silverado were so good, I didn't think they could be improved upon. Might have to look into that again.

 

Which truck did you do - the '08 or the '10?

Posted (edited)

That's my black 2010 Silverado, same one I did the front floor and bed lighting. I just snapped a quick picture after I got finished aiming the lights onto the garage wall............I don't think I am going to do the V-Max because I mainly use it to tow my camper and horse trailer. With the heavier loads, the headlights would need constant adjustment with HID's depending on what I was towing so oncoming traffic would not be affected. Going to leave that one alone for now. Having the extra light is nice but I do not want to be a road hazard by blinding people (I hate that and it's usually people with blue/purple headlights that think they are cool)!

If I can get ahold of a good set of projector headlights for that one, I may do LED highs and lows. If not, I am not going to mess with the headlights.

 

I actually ended up going with HID on this truck because I needed to replace my driver side headlight bulb and it was actually cheaper to buy a the OPT-7 Lighting HID kit than it was to purchase a set of Sylvania Silverstar Ultra bulbs.

With it being a PITA to change the bulbs, having HID's I can just replace the ballasts if the need be. I run cheap 35W Xentec HID's in my ATV's and they have held up to abuse the past few years just fine so I figured they should last quite a while in a pickup.

Edited by BlackZ71Silverado
Posted

Nice - thanks for the info. Yeah don't blame you there - my Silverado with the stock lights used to make people to high-beam me if I had anything over 500 lbs. in the bed. The Firestone air bags helped solve that issue though.

 

These GM engineers must drive Fords with some of the designs they come up with. Either that or they trade them in when a bulb blows ... :lol: Bulb changes should be a simple in-and-out deal, with NO tools.

 

HID's are great. The difference in our Grand Marquis was literally night and day. I won't even need to describe the bottom 2 pics as to which one is the "before" pic, and which is the "after". Side by side with the high beam, it makes the high beams look yellow, lol.

 

post-65085-0-40736300-1442322378_thumb.jpg

 

 

post-65085-0-40736300-1442322378_thumb.jpg

post-65085-0-40736300-1442322378_thumb.jpg

post-65085-0-40736300-1442322378_thumb.jpg

Posted

Bulb changes should be a simple in-and-out deal, with NO tools.

 

 

This. The right headlight is so inaccessible it drives me nuts. If that bulb went out during a road trip, you'd be stuck for a while, having to remove the air box and all the things that are in the way of anyone who has the hands bigger than those of a 14 year old girl.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Sweeeeet - nice ride! :cheers:

 

Wow ... '16. This means my Sportsman 800 is now 11 years old! Went by in a blink ...

 

Thanks for the reply ya its nice and very fast and powerful but having a 700cc and only weighing 420lbs wet makes a difference. But that 800 of yours must be a beast with 4x4 and winch eh?
Posted

Yeah she's a blast. I've never been stuck anywhere, lol.

 

She's become more of a tractor the past 7 years or so, jockeying trailers and boats around the yard, dragging brush, plowing snow, etc.. The first 4 years I really beat the hell out of it, racing around local trails. It's got so bad up here with abutters to the powerlines blocking the trails (not even their property!) that we've ridden for over 30 years, others calling the cops, the state enacting stupid laws, and land disappearing to condos and $750k mansions, that she stays home most of the time. Thankfully I've got a neighbor with a few hundred acres I can ride on if I need to blow off some steam.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...