Jump to content

Lower thermostats, really needed?


Recommended Posts

Posted
A common belief is that a cooler running engine will reduce intake air temperature. The reality is that outside of idle, there is very little heat transferred from the engine to the intake charge. The mass of air moving across the incredibly small surface area of the intake ports is too large and too fast to allow for any large temperature transferance.


As a vehicle sits out overnight, you may notice condensation on the windows, hood, etc from moisture in the air. That same moisture ends up in the crank case as well. An engine that does not reach the manufacturers operating temperature will not as easily boil off that condensation, especially if only short trips are taken.




With a 160* thermostat, the average operating temperature of a GM engine is approximately 180*. With the OEM thermostat, it is around 199*. A few minutes on the dyno can quickly show temps above 210-220*, regardless of the thermostat. As long as intake air temperatures remain static, power output is static and sometimes even BETTER under the 210-220* range.


In short, keep your stock tstat.
Posted

Jenna the lower stat is not for IAT temps, it is to help reduce engine temps to avoid detonation. I never installed a 160° stat for an intake charge reason. The cooler the engine and heads run the more consistant the power will be and the less the chance for detonation to sneak up on you.

Posted

Your basing your post on people puting lower stats in for pwr gain and/or lower intake temps..

I chose to go with 180 because when im towing or hauling up hills,etc.. I simply do not want them temp over 200 or near boiling, And for the fact that on a big block It does help reduce oil usage! Everyone has different reasons for what they choose to run, Not just what most assume! I would agree that for the proper fuel burning/effeiciency the motor should be near designed operating temp.

But yea..Thanks for the info,

Posted

Your basing your post on people puting lower stats in for pwr gain and/or lower intake temps..

I chose to go with 180... And for the fact that on a big block It does help reduce oil usage!

Can you explain that one? I don't understand how lower temps reduces oil usage. Curiousity question.

Posted

Jenna the lower stat is not for IAT temps, it is to help reduce engine temps to avoid detonation. I never installed a 160° stat for an intake charge reason. The cooler the engine and heads run the more consistant the power will be and the less the chance for detonation to sneak up on you.

You are correct, intake air temperature is different than coolant/engine temp, I am not referring to the IATs. I stated that this applies when "inlet temperature are constant". With 99.9% of the vehicles out now having a dry intake manifold, heat soak within the engine effectively does not occur. Any engine bay temperature variation is negligible (exhaust manifolds being the great equalizer). Remember a thermostat is not a cooling device, it is a regulating device. It merely sets the minimum, not a maximum for the regulator to open.

 

Here is an example I used for someone else:

 

If you have two identical candles that you would like to burn out at the same exact time, one in an oven at 150* and one in a freezer at 10*, should you light one earlier? The candle in the freezer would need to be ignited earlier to overcome ambient air temperatures to achieve the same completion time, just like colder air (with density CONSTANT for the sake of discussion) needs to be ignited earlier, hence the timing reduction at higher temperatures. If coolant temps were so critical, you wouldn't see NASCAR running 240-250 for an entire race or 300 during the Bud Shoot out.

Posted

Your basing your post on people puting lower stats in for pwr gain and/or lower intake temps..

I chose to go with 180 because when im towing or hauling up hills,etc.. I simply do not want them temp over 200 or near boiling, And for the fact that on a big block It does help reduce oil usage! Everyone has different reasons for what they choose to run, Not just what most assume! I would agree that for the proper fuel burning/effeiciency the motor should be near designed operating temp.

But yea..Thanks for the info,

Near 200℉ isn't even close to boiling. Between the increased boiling point of coolant as opposed to water, and the fact that your cooling system is pressurized (1 PSI of pressure further increases the boiling point by 3℉).

 

Also, what temperature does the engine coolant have to reach for the PCM to enter closed loop mode?

Posted

NASCAR doesnt even run a coolant if memory serves me right, so that is not really a good comparison. I have always ran the 160° as they put you at 180° temps once the stat opens.

 

This is one of those mods that are like CAI and UDP. I do it as the car runs more consistant and it is not always the single mod that makes the differance and all of these are mods that always have a ton of input that they work/dont work. Once the weather warms up my truck is getting a 160° and if I find a deal on one a UDP. I installed a 160° in my vette right after I bought it, car runs very well for only putting down 390rwhp with only a CAI and the stat as the mod.

Posted

NASCAR engines absolutely run coolant. The numbers I posted were from an individual that deals with tuning on them.

 

With proper tuning to deal with the unnecessary timing retardation at higher temps, the t-stat will show no difference in consistency than OEM. Put your car on the dyno and provide it fresh air. You'll find that at 180*, 200* or 220*, power will remain relatively constant or might even increase. We've seen many vehicles make their most power on the dyno at 220-230* ECT.

Posted

There was a long, long thread back when I first signed up about some guy who ran a cooler t-stat in his truck and the whole slew of codes and other errors it caused, the money he blew trying to fix it, refusing to believe the cooler t-stat was the source of the issues.

 

 

And I'm not trying to be a jerk, but to those who are trying to argue the points the BlackBear folks are making (benefits to big block and HD trucks aside), how much engine tuning experience do you have? :lol:

Posted

And I'm not trying to be a jerk, but to those who are trying to argue the points the BlackBear folks are making (benefits to big block and HD trucks aside), how much engine tuning experience do you have? :lol:

 

:thumbs:

Posted

But how much cooler are most of you going. 160 even in a tow pig is too cold most of the time unless you live in a southern US state or something. The stock thermostat temp in the LS powered GMT800's I play with is 186 F........ When I add e fans I just adjust accordingly to that and have no issues.

Posted

I think the point is, if the truck is that hot, the thermostat will be open whether it's a lower or higher thermostat.

 

My truck stays at 193 in town and 191 highway, just about all the time.

Posted

If it's getting too hot towing, loaded, wide open or whatever that is not the fault of the thermostat.... your cooling system at that point is somehow inadequate.

 

Lot's of people try and bandaid that by making the engine run cold in a hope maybe that it will be enough of a buffer to keep it from overheating.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can anyone explain why the oil pressure runs higher after the DFM is shut off?  just installed the Pulsar Lt.
    • Thanks!  I figured as such; GM and other manufacturers have used standard parts and harnesses across trim levels and such for decades.  I pulled the blank accessory cover off of my commuter van (a 2016 or so Chevy 15-passenger) years ago and found the plug for a USB outlet.  It wasn't connected to anything, though (I tried swapping in an outlet from another van).  I was a GM Tech years ago (late-90s) and was pretty familiar with my 2006.  I might be wrong, but I view newer vehicles (pretty much anything made in the past 20 years) as being a lot more plug and play.  Meaning, more unused wires and plugs unless you have the Mack Daddy of vehicles.    
    • not all plugs will be used.  gm uses more generic harnesses that support most/all options, and if your truck doesn't have a specfiic option, the plug won't be used (commonly will have a dummy insert in the plug , or it'll be taped up, but some may just be left as is).  But it's sldo possible some p.o. has installed the wrong/cheaper parts that aren't correct for your vehicle...
    • First off, I'm not trying to just get easy advice/fixes for the issues I've noticed so far.  I'll be combing through the site via searches and such, and if past experiences are any indication, should find what I need.  For the sake of conversation, though, I figured I'd post the handful of things I've noticed in the 12 hours since buying my 2010 SLE CCSB.     Indicator lights: Airbag and TPMS.  The tire pressures aren't reading for any of the wheels, so I'm pretty certain the sensors were either removed, are damaged, or are otherwise inoperable.  I used to mount and balance tires 25 years ago but am pretty much ignorant when it comes to TPMS.  My 2006 didn't have the sensors and this might be the fourth vehicle I've owned that does.     Radio: Rear speakers aren't working.  I removed the driver's side rear door panel and checked the speaker and wiring.  I also removed the sill and b-pillar covers to check the wiring.  A few minutes of Google Fu showed that this is potentially a head unit issue.    Switches: Power mirrors don't turn left/right.  I ordered replacement driver's door switches that should arrive tomorrow.  The windows and locks work but it was only about $20 for all of them.  The driver's side rear window switch lets the window down but won't put it back up.  I think the passenger rear doesn't work at all.  In the coming days/weeks, I'll break out my multimeter to check all of that.   Unknown wiring harness: There's a box attached to the front driver's side of the engine compartment, right where the second battery shelf is located.  There are three plugs, one of which looks like it fits a standard headlight-style bulb (9007 or similar).  It doesn't look like it's plugged into anything.  I'll do some digging and if I don't see anything elsewhere on the site, post some pictures here.   Unknown plugs on brake booster: There are at least two female plugs on the brake booster that aren't being used.  I think it might be a replacement/aftermarket, so maybe those are used for a different application, as there don't seem to be any unplugged harnesses and no indicator lights are on.   Little squeaks when turning: Sounds almost like a bushing around the bed of the truck.  I'll have to pay close attention as I get more familiar with the truck.   Clunk on acceleration: possibly the infamous drivetrain clunk.  My 2006 had it and I'm just not familiar enough with this truck yet to fully grasp what it is.   Anyway, my apologies for the vague and all over the place post.  This truck is new to me, and it's been four years since I drove my 2006.  With 200k miles, I know I'll need to learn this truck quickly to avoid having any major issues, despite being confident it's got much more life to it.  My 2006 had nearly 320k on it when I parked it (nearly 300k of which I put on the truck), and it was still drivable then, though I suspected the head gasket might have blown.  I'd hoped to have that truck back by now, but it's gone forever, as I detailed in my reintroduction thread.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...