Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

post-129228-141277887354_thumb.jpg

 

Getting ready to get mine done. Just wondering if this quote is on par with what everyone paid for their wheels, tires, and lift? When I put 26" rims with 305/30/26" tires and 2" drop shackles on my '14, I paid $2500. This is a different shop though.

post-129228-141277887354_thumb.jpg

post-129228-141277887354_thumb.jpg

post-129228-141277887354_thumb.jpg

Edited by Thaheavyone
Posted (edited)

attachicon.gifImageUploadedByTapatalk1412778872.822585.jpg

 

Getting ready to get mine done. Just wondering if this quote is on par with what everyone paid for their wheels, tires, and lift? When I put 26" rims with 305/30/26" tires and 2" drop shackles on my '14, I paid $2500. This is a different shop though.

 

It's all releative...here's how I'd break down your quote if I was making this happen

 

$750 Tuff Wheels shipped w/ lugs off eBay

$1,500 33" Toyo MTs shipped on eBay (didn't even search elsewhere so there are probably better deals)

$60 Mount/Balance - What my local shop charges

$450 3.5" RCX w/ Control Arms - Your's doesn't specify - I wouldn't pay somebody to install something I can do myself

 

$2,760 versus your $4,059.38 (including taxes)

 

you asked for opinions, my .02 for what it's worth is I'd love to be on the shop end of your deal

Edited by baggedlvintegra
  • Like 2
Posted
Would love to know what size/offset those Rockstars are and what tires... looks killer!

 

Tires are 305/55/20 copper Zeon ltz tires, with 20x10 and a - 24 offset

 

How much noise do those Cooper Zeons make on the highway?

Posted

Anyone added rancho quicklift or bilstein ride height? I have 2" rough country and when I hit bumps it feels like it bounces. I'm looking for a more secure leveling/lift kit that rides smooth while towing or off roading? Any suggestions

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

Hey guys, this may have been previously addressed, but does a leveling kit void the warranty at all?

 

I know the dealerships now offer lift kits and leveling kits, but if you do the install yourself will you run into problems at the dealership?

 

Thanks

Posted

Hey guys, this may have been previously addressed, but does a leveling kit void the warranty at all?

 

I know the dealerships now offer lift kits and leveling kits, but if you do the install yourself will you run into problems at the dealership?

 

Thanks

 

No. Aftermarket parts cannot void a warranty due to the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act. The only way that a dealership can legally deny you warranty service is if they can prove that the issue you are experiencing has been caused by the aftermarket part itself.

 

Also if you have a dealership that really denies you service because of a leveling kit, then you really need to find another dealership to work with. Dealership by my house sucks. They hate anything aftermarket cause they do more buick than GMC. But a dealership near where I go to school is awesome. They don't care if you come in with a truck that is completely aftermarket. They will still work on it under warranty

Posted

No. Aftermarket parts cannot void a warranty due to the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act. The only way that a dealership can legally deny you warranty service is if they can prove that the issue you are experiencing has been caused by the aftermarket part itself.

 

Also if you have a dealership that really denies you service because of a leveling kit, then you really need to find another dealership to work with. Dealership by my house sucks. They hate anything aftermarket cause they do more buick than GMC. But a dealership near where I go to school is awesome. They don't care if you come in with a truck that is completely aftermarket. They will still work on it under warranty

Thanks for the info brother.

 

Last question I've got is I had the TGC 2.5" leveling kit on my 08 Silverado and had no problems with that kit and it seemed to sit pretty level. I was thinking about going with that kit, but it seems everyone, or most of everyone is going with the RC kit w/ the taller rear block. Is there a reason RC stands out more for this truck than others or is it just personal preference? Also I had the factory block on my silverado. With a 2.5" on these new trucks is it going to have rake or squat with the factory block? I'm just confused as to why everyone is going with a taller block in the rear.

 

Thanks guys.

Posted

Thanks for the info brother.

 

Last question I've got is I had the TGC 2.5" leveling kit on my 08 Silverado and had no problems with that kit and it seemed to sit pretty level. I was thinking about going with that kit, but it seems everyone, or most of everyone is going with the RC kit w/ the taller rear block. Is there a reason RC stands out more for this truck than others or is it just personal preference? Also I had the factory block on my silverado. With a 2.5" on these new trucks is it going to have rake or squat with the factory block? I'm just confused as to why everyone is going with a taller block in the rear.

 

Thanks guys.

Personal preference and with the rough country 2.5 kit then you have the option to add the rear block but you do not have to. The truck will sit level with just the 2" spacer up front. The 2" block ( which adds 1" compared to stock) will retain some rake, which some prefer to have.

 

So in general, it's just personal preference and with how much it is talked about on here, a lot of people go with it. I had the dealer level mine and they used a skyjacker level kit for an 07-13 1500. Works just the same as the RC for 14' or any other 14' level kit. Also the RC lift has a good price for the option.

 

But if you already found a kit you like, there's no reason not to go with that if you would rather go a route you've already gone.

Posted

Personal preference and with the rough country 2.5 kit then you have the option to add the rear block but you do not have to. The truck will sit level with just the 2" spacer up front. The 2" block ( which adds 1" compared to stock) will retain some rake, which some prefer to have.

 

So in general, it's just personal preference and with how much it is talked about on here, a lot of people go with it. I had the dealer level mine and they used a skyjacker level kit for an 07-13 1500. Works just the same as the RC for 14' or any other 14' level kit. Also the RC lift has a good price for the option.

 

But if you already found a kit you like, there's no reason not to go with that if you would rather go a route you've already gone.

 

Ok great thanks for that. I guess I'll just roll with the flow and go with the RC kit. It's really not a bad price for the level and rear block. That way if I do decide to add the block I'll have it.

Posted

Awesome looking truck Steve! What lift is that? What is your wheel offset? 35" tires? Did u have to remove the rear forward mudflaps or just do it for looks?

 

I hope Im the right Steve you were talking about lo l if so the lift is a 7" Rough Country and the wheels are 18x10 -24 offset and yes 35s. I am not sure if I would have to remove the mud flaps as I removed them when it was only a few days old haha I don't like mud flaps lol

Posted

I did the Rough Country lift. 2.5, it was the 1/2 inch spacer on top of shock and then the 2 inch U shaped piece that moves the bottom shock up. No rear block change. Its all stock. My truck measures almost level front and back. 39.7 front and 40 inch in center wheel well in the back. This is a picture front stock to leveled to 295/55/20 tires. I also have a YouTube video to show my lift.ab8bc7a3bb0f1f4194e543cc2323ce9f.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

 

I hope Im the right Steve you were talking about lo l if so the lift is a 7" Rough Country and the wheels are 18x10 -24 offset and yes 35s. I am not sure if I would have to remove the mud flaps as I removed them when it was only a few days old haha I don't like mud flaps lol

What kind of mpg are you seeing with the 7" on 35s?

Posted

What kind of mpg are you seeing with the 7" on 35s?

 

With the basic Diablo Tune I was seeing 17 mpg and if on a flat interstate up to 21mpg.

Im playing more with my custom tuning from Lew so right now its a bit low but am working on finding the right spot to give me more power but with the mpg too

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,838 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...