Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Apologies, but you are incorrect for anything 2017 related. SBL does not have data on 2017 Sierra or Silverado because I called them myself and they have nothing.

I would also like to know if anyone has this info on what the replacement LED bulbs are for a 2017 GMC Sierra SLT so I could change the following lights out myself.

Reverse lights

Plate lights

Cargo Lights

I just checked the link again, and you are correct, NOT for the 2017. My bad...

Time to upgrade the reading glasses, LOL.

Posted

I just checked the link again, and you are correct, NOT for the 2017. My bad...

Time to upgrade the reading glasses, LOL.

Thanks for the link though, I ordered the bulbs that 98Sonoma posted though, they are arriving Tuesday it said.

  • Like 1
Posted

I bought the Philips 194 for the plate and 921 for the cargo area and reverse lights. Huge difference. They look great!

Thanks again the Phillips 194 arrived yesteday and can confirm they work perfectly in a 2017 for plate lights.

Eagerly awaiting the two sets of Phillips 921 and 1N4004 diodes to arrive.

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted

 

I was tired of buying these knock off brand rigid and hearing that all brands are the same. So i sucked it up and spend the money on Rigid and my god, there is a true difference in quality and craftsmanship. My rigid reverse lights are so bright that even when i back up during the day i see people covering there eyes.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just installed DDM Tuning H11 LED Bulbs, 36W, Pair, White. Installation was very quickly and painless for the driver side lowbeam. Passenger side was a bit for difficult and took more time, i had to unscrew the 4 bolts for the air intake cap and was able to push that aside. I recommend to those who drive Chevys 1500s 2014+ to also purchase resistors for your kit. Because Chevy have daytime running lights, the resistor will trick the computer to thinking that you still have halogen bulbs.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

with 16+ models, will i need can-bus bulbs? my 15 silverado i used regular LED in plate and cargo lights, with no issues. Curious if the 16 is the same since I've heard otherwise.

Posted

Just installed DDM Tuning H11 LED Bulbs, 36W, Pair, White. Installation was very quickly and painless for the driver side lowbeam. Passenger side was a bit for difficult and took more time, i had to unscrew the 4 bolts for the air intake cap and was able to push that aside. I recommend to those who drive Chevys 1500s 2014+ to also purchase resistors for your kit. Because Chevy have daytime running lights, the resistor will trick the computer to thinking that you still have halogen bulbs.

How is the output on the LED's? I have been looking at getting some Diode Dynamics H11 bulbs for low beams, but am not sure how they would do in reflector housings and how the cutoff would be. Dont want to blind everyone

  • 1 month later...
Posted

How is the output on the LED's? I have been looking at getting some Diode Dynamics H11 bulbs for low beams, but am not sure how they would do in reflector housings and how the cutoff would be. Dont want to blind everyone

The light output is amazing. I can drive around at night on a back road and dont have to turn on my high beams. I rarley have people flash there lights at me and those who do are typically old people. The light looks very clean in the housing and ive had them on for about 3 months so far and have not had one issue.

Posted

The light output is amazing. I can drive around at night on a back road and dont have to turn on my high beams. I rarley have people flash there lights at me and those who do are typically old people. The light looks very clean in the housing and ive had them on for about 3 months so far and have not had one issue.

Awesome! do you mind posting some pictures of the output? or just sending them to me directly?

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

My lights from day one where fine, compared to the projector style headlights. My main issue was the yellow looking color of the stock bulbs but after I changed to the Phillips Crystal Vision I can honestly say that they did improve my headlights. The reflective signs are noticeable now from a greater distance and in my opinion the whiter light is brighter. I live in a rural area and have no problems spotting critters on the side of the road and believe the whiter light helps in that respect also.

Just changed mine out today.... with the same ones no tyme suggested. Much whiter- pia one the pass side for to remove the dust covers and I have a k&n so it was easier but still a pain. Hope they last I've read they only last a few months

Edited by Handysix1
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

ok, so 17 Silverado, is the 3rd brake light a 194 and cargo are 921? Canbus bulb?

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

ok, so 17 Silverado, is the 3rd brake light a 194 and cargo are 921? Canbus bulb?

 

I have canbus 921's in all 3 sockets up there. 921's for reverse lights also.

 

Just FYI, I'm waiting on some 7443's for the brake lights. I'll post back here if they work.

Edited by OmniCamaro
  • Like 2
Posted

Ok, cool! Thank you!!!!

I have a 2017 LTZ, let me know about the tail lights, will you need resistors?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,189 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...