Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Had to do a trip to the other coast of Florida and it was all lower speed highways for over 4 hours one way, so I thought I'd see how high I could get my MPG. Worked out great since I've never passed so many police in that amount of time. Only outside mods are the Bakflip, AMP steps, and raised tire pressure. Max speed limit was 70 mph for 30 miles, but the rest was 60 or less. Also included my at the pump records for those who don't like the DIC numbers. My DIC averages .6 over what I calculate at the pump.

 

DSC02790

DSC02791

DSC02792

DSC02793

DSC02795

DSC02797

DSC02798

2014 09 06 22 58 27

2014 09 06 23 01 31

Edited by Crf450r420
  • Like 1
Posted

Few more from the trip. I took a few cause the mpg's kept going up...enu9apuh.jpgesa5apa2.jpg

Best 50 average is 25.1 from the same stretch

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

You do realize that "best" and "average" are two completely different things...the best is simply the best you got during that said averge point... I've had my truck go has high as 25.5, but when filling up and hand calculating (the ONLY THING THAT MATTERS) I never got over17.8 mpg....

Posted (edited)

Whatever, I'm done talking. Internet know it all's. Have fun. I'm sorry I didn't go 400 miles in that trip to get you a 400 mile average. But in my opinion a best of 25.1 over 50 miles is awesome and a best of 29.7 over 25 miles is amazing. Don't really care what you say. If you want calculations then here based on where my fuel gauge was when I got home I used about 10 gallons of gas on a 246 mile round trip. So over all for the whole trip I averaged about 24.6 MPG (give our take) so take the pen and paper and sit on it and rotate. Next time I'll drive 400 miles just to appease you but I tend to think you'll still find something to cry about.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

Edited by BringTheRain403
  • Like 1
Posted

Whatever, I'm done talking. Internet know it all's. Have fun. I'm sorry I didn't go 400 miles in that trip to get you a 400 mile average. But in my opinion a best of 25.1 over 50 miles is awesome and a best of 29.7 over 25 miles is amazing. Don't really care what you say. If you want calculations then here based on where my fuel gauge was when I got home I used about 10 gallons of gas on a 246 mile round trip. So over all for the whole trip I averaged about 24.6 MPG (give our take) so take the pen and paper and sit on it and rotate. Next time I'll drive 400 miles just to appease you but I tend to think you'll still find something to cry about.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

 

Anyone here who gets good gas mileage is going to get scrutinized because the rest of us are jealous. Last winter I got about 12 city and 17 highway, this summer I got about 14 city and 20 highway - lifetime average is 15. My neighbor has the same exact truck in 2013 a model and gets about 3-4 more MPG than me. I drive like a damn grandpa so I've given up and questioning other people's secrets or mileages. It is what it is. When I see people like you posting awesome MPGs, it just gives me hope that maybe my next truck will be more lucky haha.

Posted

Those numbers aren't what I would call normal. It must have just been the right day and the right situation. My normal highway MPG is 21-23. Sorry everyone hates on it but I have nothing to gain by playing games or lying about it. I've seen a significant increase in gas mileage since my truck has gotten broken in and doing my normal everyday driving (2-3 mile trips with barely any highway) I get 14-15 MPG. I'm not saying I normally get 29 MPG over a 25 mile stretch on the highway but that day I did.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

Posted

Those numbers aren't what I would call normal. It must have just been the right day and the right situation. My normal highway MPG is 21-23. Sorry everyone hates on it but I have nothing to gain by playing games or lying about it. I've seen a significant increase in gas mileage since my truck has gotten broken in and doing my normal everyday driving (2-3 mile trips with barely any highway) I get 14-15 MPG. I'm not saying I normally get 29 MPG over a 25 mile stretch on the highway but that day I did.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

I am interested in what speed are you running at 1500RPM 20 going 60 the best MPG I got was 20 so far hope I get results like you Norm

Posted

Whatever, I'm done talking. Internet know it all's. Have fun. I'm sorry I didn't go 400 miles in that trip to get you a 400 mile average. But in my opinion a best of 25.1 over 50 miles is awesome and a best of 29.7 over 25 miles is amazing. Don't really care what you say. If you want calculations then here based on where my fuel gauge was when I got home I used about 10 gallons of gas on a 246 mile round trip. So over all for the whole trip I averaged about 24.6 MPG (give our take) so take the pen and paper and sit on it and rotate. Next time I'll drive 400 miles just to appease you but I tend to think you'll still find something to cry about.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

The point is you're cherry picking your data points. You're welcome to believe you're getting 30mpg but I guarantee your wallet knows the difference.

Posted

I never claimed to get that on a consistent every day basis. I simply said I had a best 25 mile average of 29.7 and a best 50 mile average of 25.1. You're the one who tried to make it something it's not.

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

Posted

I am interested in what speed are you running at 1500RPM 20 going 60 the best MPG I got was 20 so far hope I get results like you Norm

I had my cruise set on 75 almost the whole way. There was two construction zones that I was down to 45 for less than ½ mile each and the occasional torne I had to slow down to about 60 for traffic. I took the pictures I'm question during one of the momentary 60 mph time frames...

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk 2

Posted

I've got about 7800 miles on mine now and avg is 18.9 mpg for all those miles. That is pretty darn good unless you compare it to a 30 mpg four banger, but for a V8, 6000 lb pickup truck, that's pretty darn good IMO.

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

3800 mile trip to/thru the Rockies and back. Stock Z71 GMC 4x4 DC with 5.3 and 3.42 gears.

 

Some impressive new numbers, and hand calculated (21.723 MPG) out to within 2 tenths/MPG (21.9 MPG per DIC) overall. That is only 31 miles or 1.417 gallons of error in a 3,800 mile trip overall. That error could be in the pumps, the DIC, or my ability to fill the tank exactly at the first tank and the final tank. All tanks in between would not matter, just accurate records of gallons used and miles overall.

 

Now understand, some of these numbers were from going down grades from 8-10%, and at times may have been steeper. But, also remember I had to drive up just as many as I was able to come down, and I was generally only getting 13-14 MPG while ascending these grades.

 

Speeds on the Highways/Freeways/ Expressways/Interstates ranged from between 55-80 MPH. Some driving in towns/cities ranged from 25-45 MPH, and most of the National Parks had a 45 MPH speed limit.

 

No, I didn't take any pics while going 80 in WY, but I did snap a few @65 MPH somewhere along the line. I was not driving like Granny either, more like I stole it.

 

Quite IMPRESSED, to say the least!

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_258608.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_29418.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_244503.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_15773.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_870987.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_240414.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_303816.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_70847.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_119979.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_328328.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_490618.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_389050.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

3800 mile trip to/thru the Rockies and back. Stock Z71 GMC 4x4 DC with 5.3 and 3.42 gears.

 

Some impressive new numbers, and hand calculated (21.723 MPG) out to within 2 tenths/MPG (21.9 MPG per DIC) overall. That is only 31 miles or 1.417 gallons of error in a 3,800 mile trip overall. That error could be in the pumps, the DIC, or my ability to fill the tank exactly at the first tank and the final tank. All tanks in between would not matter, just accurate records of gallons used and miles overall.

 

Now understand, some of these numbers were from going down grades from 8-10%, and at times may have been steeper. But, also remember I had to drive up just as many as I was able to come down, and I was generally only getting 13-14 MPG while ascending these grades.

 

Speeds on the Highways/Freeways/ Expressways/Interstates ranged from between 55-80 MPH. Some driving in towns/cities ranged from 25-45 MPH, and most of the National Parks had a 45 MPH speed limit.

 

No, I didn't take any pics while going 80 in WY, but I did snap a few @65 MPH somewhere along the line. I was not driving like Granny either, more like I stole it.

 

Quite IMPRESSED, to say the least!

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_258608.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_29418.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_244503.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_15773.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_870987.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_240414.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_303816.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_70847.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_119979.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_328328.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_490618.jpg

 

 

med_gallery_130182_2699_389050.jpg

this is the first legitimate post I have seen for impressive fuel economy!

I did 22.5 mpg on my 400 mile average through the rocky mountains as well in my 6.2L

but a little secret I've been holding out on and I think you can probably verify my theory..

yes you do have to go up the hills to coast down, but I think because of the amazing torque of these engines and the he fact you are trying to achieve the best MPG. if you drive like me likely your at or below the speed limit going up the hills. usually you can average about 15 mpg on the way up, but on the way down often times your at 99 mpg (using 0 fuel) while you coast.

in my Tacoma I used to shift to N all the time on the down hills. it allows you to use that inertia to get you a good distance up the next hill. in fact you can coast for miles and stay near the Posted speed limit, sometimes 10 mph over sometimes less than the PSL.

I haven't done much neutral costing in the sierra but I know it will average about 70-75 mpg while idling and coasting down a hill.

so here's my theory.. when going down hill I often will just touch the gas pedal to attain 75 mpg which is the same fuel used if I am in N but also allowing the truck to coast as if in neutral while staying in gear, essentially I am taking away most if not all the engine braking until I get to a point I am going over the PSL in which case I let off which will cut the fuel injection off and yield infinite MPG (99 mpg)

 

when you drive on flat ground you have to have the truck constantly in drive and constantly using fuel. there simply is no time your going to be in fuel cut unless your slowing down.

 

going over the mountains is a different story, your not really using a lot of extra gas getting up the hills, first off at my elevation there is less air density, this means you use less energy to push through it and it get's better as you go up in elevation. (you also tend to use less fuel cause you have less air. additionally, going up the hill slower means less fuel used. fuel you get to save further going down the other side.

 

I also know this is true because I consistently get about 2-3 better mpg than everyone else living in colorado

Posted (edited)

No neutral coasting while descending at all. Zero. I was letting the truck do it's thing, engine braking. Sometimes it would actually downshift 2 whole gears, depending on the grade and speed.

 

All those numbers were within 1.77 tenths MPG when it was all said and done. I know that some have reported up to 5 tenths MPG margin of error from tank to tank between the DIC and hand calculations. I have also had up to 5 tenths on some tanks here at home over the last year, but this 3800 mile trip is a much bigger/better statistical sample/example overall.

 

At the higher elevations, I was actually getting in the low to mid 20's MPG while cruising @ 80 MPH in V8 mode. When I was in V4 mode, it was high 30's and even low 40's at times on the flat tops. My truck loved the higher elevation. Here at home it is only 735-750 feet, on average.

 

The DI engine is much more responsive than other older gas trucks I have driven in the mountains. Not diesel level, but much better. Years ago (2002) on an elk hunt in Colorado I drove my buddies Power Stroke in the mountains, it was impressive even with a fully loaded trailer behind it. No towing on my trip though, so can't give any comparisons on that.

 

Never felt underpowered on the entire trip, not once. Very happy with the performance, and absolutely no hiccups. Hope everything stays the same after my trip to the dealer next week for the piled up recalls that I was avoiding until after my trip.

Edited by Ventilator
Posted (edited)

'14 5.3L, 3.42 gear, 4x4. Crew cab, short bed. I have been driving between Tampa and Orlando daily since I bought it. Burning 87 gas, shell or the cheap brands. 4,700 miles on the truck today. Mileage has been getting good lately. I've been averaging 18.7 to the tank per the DIC. Hwy, trips to the gym, errands etc. I can easily do 16 city. Hwy is funny. Speed, time of day, etc varies a lot. I've done up to 22 and as bad as 18. But for the most part it's about 19.5 or 20 hwy. that's with cruise at 78 or 79, Ac on. Very happy with mileage. I hear rattle sometimes, like spark knock. It's the ECM getting everything it can out of the gas. I have a sneaky feeling if I ran 93 I could get more out of it. The programming on these new trucks is pushed to the limit for MPG's.

 

As a side note, I've been hand calculating fill-ups. the DIC is consistently 0.5mpg HIGH. I even used the same pump on one tank to rule out the pump variable. The DIC is giving a .5mpg inflation. FYI. My 2007 BMW 335i does the same thing. About .5mpg high. Must be the law allows them to be within a certain amount and they obviously want people thinking the car is getting the best mileage possible on the test drive to BUY them.

Edited by FL335i

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...