Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I rerouted the lines on my catch can and moved it from the brake booster to the spare battery tray to get rid of the buzzing in the pedals and voila - gone! Pretty happy with how it turned out. Was worried about lines all over the engine bay with the long runs over to the tray but found out a good way to route them and think it turned out pretty clean. Pics below:

 

04aaf1366b544da780fd9fd2d224f9fd.jpg

 

7cc929a22358dd96a9a9a601b38cfff2.jpg

 

963e9e4385d98f6845f054c148141b62.jpg

 

bd0f51f93ebe50e13fa335a4b8faf06b.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

Looks like they put the washer fluid fill neck right in your way on the new ones.

 

In my opinion, longer lines are to your benefit - the longer the run, the more the mixture cools off and condenses and finds itself in the catch can.

 

Just took a 2+ hour drive today - the catch can hoses & the can itself (located on core support in front of battery tray) were barely above ambient, while the engine and everything close to it was blazing hot.

Posted (edited)

Looks like they put the washer fluid fill neck right in your way on the new ones.

 

In my opinion, longer lines are to your benefit - the longer the run, the more the mixture cools off and condenses and finds itself in the catch can.

 

Just took a 2+ hour drive today - the catch can hoses & the can itself (located on core support in front of battery tray) were barely above ambient, while the engine and everything close to it was blazing hot.

 

Good to hear, yeah I think this will work out in the long run too. When I got home from work yesterday and was going to tackle the project, the catch can was pretty hot (mounted to the brake booster) along with all the lines which I expected since its in the engine bay in FL where its 90 deg already. With the new location in the battery tray it should be cooler as well as be a whole lot easier to check and dump the oil.

Edited by hotrodz37
Posted

I rerouted the lines on my catch can and moved it from the brake booster to the spare battery tray to get rid of the buzzing in the pedals and voila - gone! Pretty happy with how it turned out. Was worried about lines all over the engine bay with the long runs over to the tray but found out a good way to route them and think it turned out pretty clean. Pics below:

 

04aaf1366b544da780fd9fd2d224f9fd.jpg

 

7cc929a22358dd96a9a9a601b38cfff2.jpg

 

963e9e4385d98f6845f054c148141b62.jpg

 

bd0f51f93ebe50e13fa335a4b8faf06b.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks good!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

About to order an elite can, should I get the exit line check valve?

Posted

About to order an elite can, should I get the exit line check valve?

No you only need it if you have a turbo.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

No, not needed on a stock set-up

Thanks, payment on the way..

 

No you only need it if you have a turbo.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks.. i wish some boost was in the plans lol

  • Like 1
Posted

I know it's pretty well known. But I finally got around to editing my catch can install video. Hopefully helps out a few people.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Just drained my again at 1100KM since last drain . Its getting nicer out now so not as much water building up in it.

 

Catch Can

 

Posted

Same here - I haven't cleaned mine in over a month (don't drive much), and the moisture that was in the can has evaporated off. Level hasn't changed in a while now.

 

This could also be because I'm a quart low on oil now. Time to change the oil today anyway.

Posted

So I wonder if overall the catch cans will collect less in the new ecotec3 engines?

 

"PCV-integrated rocker covers: new domed rocker covers house a patent-pending integrated positive crankcase ventilation system that enhances oil life, reduces oil consumption and reduces exhaust emissions. The domed sections of the covers contain baffles that separate oil and air from the crankcase gases, with about three times the oil/air separation capability of previous engines."

 

Read more:

http://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/gm-engines/l83/

 

Still keeping my can installed but hopefully this new engineering will prove to be true and prevent less oil from getting to the intake for all those who don't want to deal with the maintenance of emptying a can.

Posted

So I wonder if overall the catch cans will collect less in the new ecotec3 engines?

 

"PCV-integrated rocker covers: new domed rocker covers house a patent-pending integrated positive crankcase ventilation system that enhances oil life, reduces oil consumption and reduces exhaust emissions. The domed sections of the covers contain baffles that separate oil and air from the crankcase gases, with about three times the oil/air separation capability of previous engines."

 

Read more:

http://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/gm-engines/l83/

 

Still keeping my can installed but hopefully this new engineering will prove to be true and prevent less oil from getting to the intake for all those who don't want to deal with the maintenance of emptying a can.

 

It may help a little technically because the baffle design is doing "something" but there was guy that posted pictures of his valves after removing the intake manifold and they were quite dirty with build-up. So I'd argue the improvement isn't much to feel good about. Probably designed to help the engine last 100,000 miles......

Posted (edited)

Elite Engineering can installed, black with AN fittings. Mine came with a black mounting bracket as well. I'm adding braided hose sleeve to the lines next week.

post-204-0-90922100-1430181346_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-37149800-1430181374_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-64703800-1430181375_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-90922100-1430181346_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-37149800-1430181374_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-64703800-1430181375_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-90922100-1430181346_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-37149800-1430181374_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-64703800-1430181375_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-90922100-1430181346_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-37149800-1430181374_thumb.jpg

post-204-0-64703800-1430181375_thumb.jpg

Edited by RobZ71LM7
Posted

Elite Engineering can installed, black with AN fittings. Mine came with a black mounting bracket as well. I'm adding braided hose sleeve to the lines next week.

 

Looks very nice!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,716 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...