Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

your max tow didn't come with tow mirrors? When i build one on the GMC site it automatically changed to add the tow mirrors. ^^^

Early on I remember the 14's didn't automatically come with tow mirrors, it was an option only available when you had max tow

 

Max tow doesn't come with 20's either.

Max tow forces 20's when you have the 6.2. I can't see any other reason then to milk even more out of the customer who already pays $2k for the 6.2 upgrade

 

I thought it also came with 3.73 gears only. [emoji15]

It does, think he was saying he will compare to a buddies 6.2 with normal 3.42 to see the difference

Posted

your max tow didn't come with tow mirrors? When i build one on the GMC site it automatically changed to add the tow mirrors. ^^^

I looked at every max tow in the country,dont know if any had the mirrors,015 is standard camper mirror with max tow

 

here is a truck I was interested in.Dealer wouldnt deal

 

http://www.hendersonchevy.com/f_WindowSticker?VIN=1GCVKSEJ1EZ415957 no mirrors

Posted

Max tow doesn't come with 20's either.

Max tow only comes with 20s new body

 

your thinking old school last Gen. max tow 17" only

Posted (edited)

I thought it also came with 3.73 gears only. [emoji15]

Max tow was 4.10s in 2006 2007 with the 6.0 the 6.2s max tow came in 010 with 3.73 only. till 013 then new body max tow 3.73 for 2014.Then for 2015 its 3.42 only max tow along with 8sp,which are on constrain until Jan.None have been built.......some 015 3:23 6.2s have been built but no max tows.

Edited by Gonzoid
Posted (edited)

Some here might remember this,my last max tow

 

 

 

 

 

If you say .if thats a max tow it didnt come with 18s,you would be correct

Edited by Gonzoid
  • Like 1
Posted

Just picked mine up Tuesday! Still waiting on Royalty Core grille to show up so i can install and change all the chrome to white and a few pieces black (body shop wants to wait until grille is here).attachicon.gifIMG_327653769964004.jpegattachicon.gifIMG_327649293663075.jpegattachicon.gifIMG_327646162211831.jpeg

4" with 35's?
  • Like 1
Posted

Here's mine after running around all day with the kids and wife. Almost 200 miles already and it drives and feels like a dream. Even scored a compliment when we parked at breakfast :)

post-132817-141496768228_thumb.jpg

 

 

Sent from the future using a Fax

post-132817-141496768228_thumb.jpg

post-132817-141496768228_thumb.jpg

post-132817-141496768228_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted

These tires are 34.5". But yes 4" lift.

Looks awesome...nicely done....

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Here's mine after running around all day with the kids and wife. Almost 200 miles already and it drives and feels like a dream. Even scored a compliment when we parked at breakfast :)

attachicon.gifImageUploadedByTapatalk1414967681.238550.jpg

Sent from the future using a Fax

She's beautiful mate. Congrats , what a beast.

Here's mine after running around all day with the kids and wife. Almost 200 miles already and it drives and feels like a dream. Even scored a compliment when we parked at breakfast :)

attachicon.gifImageUploadedByTapatalk1414967681.238550.jpg

Sent from the future using a Fax

She's beautiful mate. Congrats , what a beast.

Posted

Here's mine after running around all day with the kids and wife. Almost 200 miles already and it drives and feels like a dream. Even scored a compliment when we parked at breakfast :)

attachicon.gifImageUploadedByTapatalk1414967681.238550.jpg

Sent from the future using a Fax

She's beautiful mate. Congrats , what a beast.

Posted

She's beautiful mate. Congrats , what a beast.

Thanks!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,706 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...