Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

EC, truck looks great, please don't go black like your were indicating you were thinking of doing!

Posted

EC, truck looks great, please don't go black like your were indicating you were thinking of doing!

 

Thanks my man, I'm leaving the chrome wheels for now. I'll probably end up going black when I mess the suspension and a few other things but that won't be til after Summer. Who knows my mind may change by then lol.

 

Btw, love you're tire setup! Jealous. lol

Posted

how is the noise with the new tires?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

None to speak of. I don't perceive a diff.

Posted

EC, truck looks great, please don't go black like your were indicating you were thinking of doing!

I was just thinking the exact opposite. ...that pic sealed the deal to me. Black it out with that grille.

 

Looks good.

Posted (edited)

If you're referring to mine, they are black already. Came from the factory like that. But yes, I agree they look better blacked out on my truck.

 

Looked chrome in the photos. Looks good. Edited by ahahnu
  • Like 1
Posted

2015 z71 dc, 2.5 RC front only, 305/60/18 procomp at's , tinted windows and visor strip

DSC00528_zps7281428b.jpg?1423589710355&1

 

DSC00524_zps046b0eda.jpg?1423589710356&1

 

DSC00523_zps66fcf20d.jpg?1423589710356&1

  • Like 6
Posted
Gave her a fresh wash on my lunch break. Check out the 5K HID's, love the color and output vs stock!


2015 02 10 10.58.13

Posted

 

Gave her a fresh wash on my lunch break. Check out the 5K HID's, love the color and output vs stock!

 

 

Truck looks really good. What level/tires are you running?

 

I took the front air dam off my AT but I plan on levelling it in the future and I may put it back on. Such difficult decisions haha

Posted (edited)

Thanks. It's got a 2.25 Pro Comp level with 2 inch blocks in the rear. Tires are 305/55/20 on a +12 offset, no rub.

 

I'll take the air dam off once it warms up to see how it looks. I don't mind it at all...but some of the pictures that I've seen with it off convince me otherwise. So true..such first world problems lol.

Edited by Trza
Posted

Thanks. It's got a 2.25 Pro Comp level with 2 inch blocks in the rear. Tires are 305/55/20 on a +12 offset, no rub.

 

I'll take the air dam off once it warms up to see how it looks. I don't mind it at all...but some of the pictures that I've seen with it off convince me otherwise. So true..such first world problems lol.

Truck looks great! I'm also in the Edmonton area. I recently pulled my lower air dam off, but I'm not really sold on it. I think I'm going to trim it down and see how it looks.

 

With valence:

 

20150206_115346_zps5jvlhbff.jpg

 

20150206_115431_zpswxtb9qto.jpg

 

Removed:

 

20150208_173459_zpsbsejgdxa.jpg

 

20150208_173404_zpsd0zzhc16.jpg

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Truck looks great! I'm also in the Edmonton area. I recently pulled my lower air dam off, but I'm not really sold on it. I think I'm going to trim it down and see how it looks.

 

With valence:

I like with valence better, I think the truck was designed with the valence in mind and really helps the overall styling and continuity of the truck.

 

dkPyTkP.jpg

 

I understand why some people remove them though as they do hinder attack angles.

  • Like 3
Posted

I like with valence better, I think the truck was designed with the valence in mind and really helps the overall styling and continuity of the truck.

 

dkPyTkP.jpg

 

I understand why some people remove them though as they do hinder attack angles.

I agree that it looks more "complete" with it... It just annoys me looking at it from this angle:

 

edit5_zpsrogwltgw.jpg

 

Kinda reminds me of this...

cartoon-beaver-clip-art.jpg

 

Trimmed down seems like a Win-Win to me:

75d71d8836ebfbf4f75a213d5d8b1999_zpsbvib

 

 

4da72761a2ccecfcd4f1f488695d05d7_zps1zaq

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

I agree that it looks more "complete" with it... It just annoys me looking at it from this angle:

 

Haha, yeah I could see how that would get annoying. In GM's defense they designed it with the factory ride height in mind. Since you are leveld/3" lift, it allows more light to get under it and exaggerate its design.

 

When you are bumming it on stock ride height like me, its less obvious.

 

Lb8AXBv.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,611 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...