Jump to content

M&P Shield or Springfield XDs


Mossyoakglock

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Shield is just fine. Everybody likes to say they own a Cadillac just because they can. Own SWs from Sigma on up, started with the Sig (inexpensive) and still like it because it feels good in my hand. The *G* guys at the range have all read about the slam on the Sigs and SDs. They don't like to admit, but they confirm they shoot well.

I tell everybody to go shoot everything they can get their hands on before buying. Just too bad you couldn't do a blind taste test? I think people would be surprised in the end.

Posted

A gun's a gun if it doesn't jam on you and serve its purpose well when the need arises like a home invasion, armed robbery and car jacking. I was a huge fan of the 1911 pistol but the Glock stole my heart; I'm a big advocate of the pistol.

Posted

A gun's a gun if it doesn't jam on you and serve its purpose well when the need arises like a home invasion, armed robbery and car jacking. I was a huge fan of the 1911 pistol but the Glock stole my heart; I'm a big advocate of the pistol.

Mine is sitting next to me as I write this. ;)

Posted

Mine is on my waist as we speak :)

It's been a lazy afternoon of Top Gear re-runs. :lol: I didn't even put my belt on till an hour or so ago to run out and do a few errands.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

My father has the shield in .40 and I have a M&P in .45, full size. I'm looking for a new concealed carry to possibly replace my Glock 26. Love the Glock, just looking for something a bit narrower to carry around. Perhaps the M&P compact 9mm.??? Input?

  • 4 months later...
Posted

I'm kind of a small framed guy, so when I was looking for a carry gun I got the XDS .45. I absolutely love this gun. Very nice to shoot despite the short barrel. Sits low in the hand so that helps to manage the recoil. But I've never had a problem with .45 recoil anyway. Fell in love with the .45 Auto round when I was in the service.

Posted

I am contemplating getting an xds 45

 

 

Ryan

Posted

Springfield XD(M) has S&W beat completely. The XDS itself is a pretty amazing piece. Single stack .45 in a sub-compact - done deal.

 

I am a huge fan of the new XDM line and have shot quite a few. The 3.8" is super accurate for a shorter barrel and recoil is managed quite easily

 

A few weeks ago I ran my Springer 1911 railed operator and the XDM 3.8. While the 1911 was slightly more accurate, I found that the XDM 3.8 was right there with it. Getting back on target after a mag change is easier with the 1911, but you have more rounds in that double-stack XDM.

Posted

I was in the same indecision earlier this year. To me they both shoot identical, so it was down to the mechanics and style. For breakdown I much preferred the XD series, very simple. I also like the "safety" if you will. The m&p they had on hand had the physical safety switch. The Springfield only has a grip safety, so you don't have any safety lock to remember when you're in the moment.

Posted

Just picked up a little secondary carry. A little S&W 642 38 special+p. I am very impressed with the gun. Less than 15 oz. Fits right in my front pocket and can't even tell its there. Fit and finish is superb. For a second carry or one for your wifes purse, I would definitely recommend this wheel gun.

Posted

If you're looking for something really easy to carry, but still super accurate, check out the Sig Sauer P238. I have the SAS model with the custom shop services (full carry melt, trijicon sights, etc.) and absolutely love it. Never gave .380 a thought before this.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

I have them both. 9mm shield is a more reliable, easier to handle and conceal firearm. Good luck in your decision.

Posted

I carry my M&P Shield every day in a kidex inside the waistband holster and absolutely love it! I installed Tru Glo TFO night sights on mine. Great firearm for everyday carry as well as shooting on the range.

 

IMG_0341_zpsgml3ki7o.jpg!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,824
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Ryanwehr14
    Newest Member
    Ryanwehr14
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 525 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • A while back, my truck (2018 GMC Sierra 1500 5.3) went in for an o2 sensor and routine service. The tech identified that my rear output seal on my transfer case was leaking, and recommended I have them replace it. At the time I didn't think anything of it, and had them do the repair. Less than a month later, I noticed that the recently repaired seal was leaking again. I called the shop that did the repair and they warrantied the repair and replaced the same seal again. A few months later, I noticed that once again the same seal leak had come back. It wasn't a great time to bring it in and I ended up just living with it for 6 months or so, noticing small (smaller than a baseball) size oil stains below the truck when it would sit for a while, as well as oil spray on the frame (to the point where it actually took the underbody coating off in that one spot). Finally got around to brining it in again, but this time I took it to a dealership service center since I am in a different part of the state for school. They identified the same output seal leaks and recommended they replace them. They also said there was no scoring on the inside of the transfer case, so it didn't need to be replaced. They chalked up the original repair failures to non oem seals and a job that wasn't done correctly. Now they called and said the seals are holding after driving/sitting for a while, but they found a very small leak in the middle, that they recommended they seal with some kind of silicone/jb weld (not sure what they are using). I haven't picked up the truck yet, but I have been reluctant about this whole repair process because I feel like they are just fixing the same thing that keeps coming back, and I am concerned there could be another root cause for the seal failing. Has anybody else experienced anything like this, or have any ideas on other things that could be the root cause?
    • I just started having AC issues with my 2012 Sierra. The symptom is blowing warm air on all vents.  Here is what I have checked so far. Compressor clutch appears to be engaging and cycling  I checked all fuses and relay, no issues. The only thing I have notices is the short line that comes from the firewall is very cold / frosted. This line is approximately 12 inches long. The coldness stops when it hits the first line connector. As far as AC compressor - At first start the clutch engages, runs continually, Short AC line frosts up. After idling for several minutes the AC line thaws out some but is still cool and the compressor clutch starts cycling on and off every 5 seconds.  Any suggestions on what to look at next would be appreciated.  
    • Unless you are using a bypass filer system with a Beta of 1000 at 2 micron the commercial filters we have access to, even the very best of them, are poor at the 5 to 10 micron range the typical UOA test can 'see'. Point is there are some truly awful filters being sold A 45 micron Beta 75 filter is what Dyson used to call a screen door on a submarine. That leaves wear metals disconnected from filtration unless particulates are larger than the test can 'see' and yet captured by the filter...which is its job. If that is true then you have a major issue screaming at you.    The graph isn't mine. It belongs to GM and their study on this area. I looked up those studies and provided those SAE tech paper addresses multiple times. Machinery Lubrication displayed it and confirmed it. So if you have doubts about the study you'll have to take it up with GM Engineering. Just like you would have to take up a difference in opinion about the meaning a word with Webster or the length of on inch with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.      Most manuals have two schedules. "Normal Service" and "Severe Service". On it's face it tells you that oil in severe service is more highly stressed and doesn't "Last as Long". The item to bore in on is LAST...what does that mean?    It's the same question one asks about how long to toast bread. What are the inputs? Bread type? Wattage of the toaster? Distance from the elements? What is your preferred level of done?    So lets paint this with a broader brush. Oil is made up of the base and the additive package. The first is altered by heat and oxygen and later is sacrificial with a finite life subject to inputs toward that end. Resistance and supply.    It is the reason an OEM's OCI's are determined by 1.) the specifications of the recommended lubricant and 2.) risk management toward the bottom line. Those lubricants are also subject to cost effectiveness for the OEM.    There is a tendency for most people to believe that the OEM recommended oil rest on the top shelf and that anything other is lesser than. Truth is there are more oils on higher shelves than those on the lower shelf below the OEM's. They make that choice on COST TO THE OEM. Testing is incidental to the margin.    GM makes MONEY, the car/truck is a TOOL to leverage MONEY. Insert whatever car brand you like. Until you forking over a million plus COST not quality is the driver. Thus it is by DESIGN the recommended OCI's and oils fall well short of 'best practice protections'. Proof isn't hard to find. GM Ecotec I-4 2400 breather system and cold start PCM tuning has killed more motors and resulted in more litigation for those that used the 'recommended' practice than GM could bear. What was their response? SHORTEN THE OCI. TWICE.    I don't know how long to leave oil in an I don't know how the oil will respond to MY circumstances and because I don't and can't blanket statement or anecdotal evidence my way out of it.....I TEST and FIND the right OCI for the oil I CHOOSE. There is no shortcut but there is blind allegiance. I don't blindly trust anything.    People hear the word 'detergent' and believe that in the context of oil it means the same thing as laundry soap... Only in the most rudimentary way. It's the first additive to give up on you and they are putting less and less with each new API standard. Solvency can be used but it cost. Some unique undisclosed chemistries can be used. Valvoline R & P in example. OEM's haven't an interest in anything they see as limiting market participation. Whatever.         
    • For some unexplained reason my father wanted a salvage yard. As we were getting the family business off the ground one brother ran the salvage yard. We gathered there when rained out working on pipelines in the eighties to pull parts. Perfectly good running vehicles would come to us simply because they wouldn’t pass emissions inspection. We were able to swap parts and sell some of them. I got a clean old nova with a bad engine. I pulled a perfectly good small block out a Camaro. A father and son project with a rebuilt engine. The son couldn’t get the engine running right. The problem was the spark plugs weren’t gapped. The 90s vehicles probably widened the gap of shade tree do it yourself engine repair. My do it yourself hot rod repair stopped at the 70s. After that my trusted mechanic kept them in running shape. 
    • I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...