Jump to content

2014+ Exhaust Systems & Mufflers

Escalade1979

By Escalade1979
in Engines & Drivetrain

 Share

Recommended Posts

Danthaman69 Enthusiast

Danthaman69

Posted
Posted

thank you for your reply.I should have worded the question better.I know the cat back Borla does not have the flapper valve.That is the reason I am interested in that system.I have read earlier posts of people using 2013 or earlier borla catback systems on 2014 models.Also know gm/borla uses the flap valve.Question!!!,Can or will a 2013 Borla catback fit on a 2014 without any mods.This is for a reg cab only.thanks

It should fit fine.

  • Like 1
  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

whodatfan
whodatfan

Finally had the tips moved to rear quarter flush and with a slight stagger.   Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

GreyGhostZ71
GreyGhostZ71

Corsa cat back with ARH headers. Love it         Sent from Tapashit

Luster
Luster

The number of hours spent on any given forum are directly proportional to the number of dollars spent on subject vehicle.   Ask me how I know.

Posted Images

mdmischief Enthusiast

mdmischief

Posted
Posted

Anyone have a photo of the GM/Borla exhaust that are split rear exit on their truck?Also a sound clip would also be helpful.Called Borla and they said this is the touring version.I have a sport version on my 2008 and really like the sound.Just wondering if this 2014 system will be loud enough on a 2014 reg cab.Thanks

 

I'm hoping mine will get here Monday/Tuesday. I'll post back once I have it installed.

thecobra Enthusiast

thecobra

Posted
Posted

Figured I would mention here, I wanted to see what my truck sounded like at idle / rev with the butterfly valve open on my exhaust, so I had someone rev it while I was back there. I noticed the square piece on the outside actually turns when the valve opens. I know a lot of people on here have clamped the valve, just wondering if they turned it first? Might be impeding the flow if you didn't..

14SLTZ71 Enthusiast

14SLTZ71

Posted
Posted

Figured I would mention here, I wanted to see what my truck sounded like at idle / rev with the butterfly valve open on my exhaust, so I had someone rev it while I was back there. I noticed the square piece on the outside actually turns when the valve opens. I know a lot of people on here have clamped the valve, just wondering if they turned it first? Might be impeding the flow if you didn't..

Yes, of course, you need to turn the valve to the open position before clamping it.

courts94s Enthusiast

courts94s

Posted
Posted

How do I make my 4.3L sound like a 6.2L? (Without buying a new '14 Silverado. I already traded in my '14 5.3L)

 

 

Go Army! GO ORDNANCE!!!

corwest Enthusiast

corwest

Posted
Posted

How do I make my 4.3L sound like a 6.2L? (Without buying a new '14 Silverado. I already traded in my '14 5.3L)

 

 

Go Army! GO ORDNANCE!!!

Find a way to add 2 more cylinders and 2 more liters to the motor. Kidding, I don't think you will ever get the 6.2 rumble from a v-6.

 

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

courts94s Enthusiast

courts94s

Posted
Posted

Find a way to add 2 more cylinders and 2 more liters to the motor. Kidding, I don't think you will ever get the 6.2 rumble from a v-6.

 

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

Yeah, I was just kidding too... I do like my MPG a lot.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

corwest Enthusiast

corwest

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I was just kidding too... I do like my MPG a lot.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hey to be completely honest I am very impressed with this new V-6 that GM put out. Not one single issue on my whole truck so far. And coming from the 5.3 in my 08 Sierra I don't miss it.

 

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

courts94s Enthusiast

courts94s

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I like it! I traded my '14 5.3L for my '14 4.3L. I was reading one of the forum topics and apparently my V6 can tow more weight than some V8's because of my gears. I don't really know for sure though (or care, really) I just got it because it looks sooooo sweat! I just wish it sounded more like my '04 V6 Silverado. That truck sounded great! This new one is just whisper quiet.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

acfirst05 Enthusiast

acfirst05

Posted
Posted

I just installed the Corsa Sport exhaust today. Single side exit, black tips. Really love it so far! Sounds great in V8 mode. You can hear it in V4 mode (helicopter sound...), but it isn't too bad. With the radio up and a/c on, I don't notice a sound difference while cruising on the highway.

 

truckexhaust.jpg

  • Like 1
Strykers_Inc Enthusiast

Strykers_Inc

Posted
Posted

GM Performance Parts Borla Exhaust for 6.2L Part#19303341

 

 

Quick Video -

post-131387-0-17156000-1406555072_thumb.jpg

post-131387-0-19616300-1406555084_thumb.jpg

post-131387-0-17156000-1406555072_thumb.jpg

post-131387-0-19616300-1406555084_thumb.jpg

post-131387-0-17156000-1406555072_thumb.jpg

post-131387-0-19616300-1406555084_thumb.jpg

post-131387-0-17156000-1406555072_thumb.jpg

post-131387-0-19616300-1406555084_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
14SLTZ71 Enthusiast

14SLTZ71

Posted
Posted (edited)

GM Performance Parts Borla Exhaust for 6.2L Part#19303341c[/url]

Does the front pipe have a valve and bypass pipe on it? If so, can you post a pic.

Edited by 14LTZZ71
Strykers_Inc Enthusiast

Strykers_Inc

Posted
Posted

Does the front pipe have a valve and bypass pipe on it? If so, can you post a pic.

 

 

Yes it does, and I will have to post a picture later. I have zero drone. I had a flowmaster super50 on prior to this, and the drone was very minimal, could barely notice it. Now I have none at all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,769 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...