Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Got my Borla S-Type installed finally. I love the way it sounds both on initial start-up, cruising on the highway, and when you get aggressive with the throttle. Can't wait to get my headers and Y-pipe installed now, though it will bw a few months until that happens...

Posted

I just ordered the GM Borla kit, should be here Thursday. Looking forward to it. Appreciate all the info on here.

Posted

Will installing a GM Borla kit for a 6.2 on a 5.3 have any negative effect?  I know its not a direct bolt on due to the size difference in ball flange.  Just debating if I should just sell and get correct kit or cut and weld a correct flange on pipe.....

Posted
Will installing a GM Borla kit for a 6.2 on a 5.3 have any negative effect?  I know its not a direct bolt on due to the size difference in ball flange.  Just debating if I should just sell and get correct kit or cut and weld a correct flange on pipe.....
In my limited knowledge yet extensive research I would think using the 6.2 liters exhaust would have a negative effect on a 5.3. I have the 6.2 and the exhaust pipe size is 3.5". I would bet you'd lose some torque down low in the rpms do to not having enough exhaust gas velocity.
In fact I've wondered if the 3.5" is a little big for the 6.2 even.
However maybe Borlas kit is 3" like some others which may be ok. What size is the pipe in Borlas kit?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
In my limited knowledge yet extensive research I would think using the 6.2 liters exhaust would have a negative effect on a 5.3. I have the 6.2 and the exhaust pipe size is 3.5". I would bet you'd lose some torque down low in the rpms do to not having enough exhaust gas velocity.
In fact I've wondered if the 3.5" is a little big for the 6.2 even.
However maybe Borlas kit is 3" like some others which may be ok. What size is the pipe in Borlas kit?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk


The 6.2 uses 3.5 to the muffler then 2.75 after the muffler i believe stock so I’m not sure how negative an all 3” muffler back would be on the 6.2?


2017 Chevy Silverado LTZ Z71 6.2L
4.5" Zone
22x10 American Force Grips
33x12.5 Nitto Ridge Grapplers
Instagram @wildchevys
Posted

The 6.2 uses 3.5 to the muffler then 2.75 after the muffler i believe stock so I’m not sure how negative an all 3” muffler back would be on the 6.2?

 

 

2017 Chevy Silverado LTZ Z71 6.2L

4.5" Zone

22x10 American Force Grips

33x12.5 Nitto Ridge Grapplers

Instagram @wildchevys

I'm only speaking of what I've seen on my 2011 6.2 and my 2015 6.2. other than a couple spots it's necked down to about 3" the rest of the pipe was 3 1/2" all the way to the exit. I have the entire stock system in one piece from the cat back in my garage so I'll try to measure it when I get home.

 

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Posted
I'm only speaking of what I've seen on my 2011 6.2 and my 2015 6.2. other than a couple spots it's necked down to about 3" the rest of the pipe was 3 1/2" all the way to the exit.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk


My ‘17 6.2 was 3.5 to the muffler than 2.75 i believe after that to the “tip”


2017 Chevy Silverado LTZ Z71 6.2L
4.5" Zone
22x10 American Force Grips
33x12.5 Nitto Ridge Grapplers
Instagram @wildchevys
Posted

Well got the exhaust installed tonight. I was able to do it in the dark with some spotlights, two hours from walking outside to cleaning up. Myself only, no help, and only had to jack up the passenger side a little bit to get the old exhaust out. The GM borla kit sounds absolutely perfect, actually a little louder than I expected but still quiet in the cab. Fit was dead on.

Posted
17 hours ago, michigan2500hd said:

In my limited knowledge yet extensive research I would think using the 6.2 liters exhaust would have a negative effect on a 5.3. I have the 6.2 and the exhaust pipe size is 3.5". I would bet you'd lose some torque down low in the rpms do to not having enough exhaust gas velocity.
In fact I've wondered if the 3.5" is a little big for the 6.2 even.
However maybe Borlas kit is 3" like some others which may be ok. What size is the pipe in Borlas kit?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

I'll measure this evening and report back..... 

Posted

Reduction of backpressure downstream will not have negative effect on torque. 

Posted
On 2/23/2018 at 3:07 PM, PhatBoy said:

Will installing a GM Borla kit for a 6.2 on a 5.3 have any negative effect?  I know its not a direct bolt on due to the size difference in ball flange.  Just debating if I should just sell and get correct kit or cut and weld a correct flange on pipe.....

My friend had a similar situation with his 15 Tahoe.  Got a GM Borla off of ebay from a salvage place, turns out it was for a 6.2 Yukon XL.  Got a 3" flange installed and middle pipe shortened and everything else bolted up.  Been running 2 months with no issues.  Its not very loud unless you are on it but it sounds good.  FWIW both systems muffler is dual 2.25" out.  I didn't do a calculation but I would think the most restrictive component after adding either system would be the cats.

Posted

Since hearing that GM is ramping up the dreaded Active Fuel Mgmt. to drop to ONE cylinder on the T1 trucks, I've been curious what the aftermarket exhaust will end up sounding like.  My grandpa had an old 1 cylinder john deere tractor...not a very sexy sound.

Posted
On 2/23/2018 at 10:03 PM, WC_LTZ said:

Well got the exhaust installed tonight. I was able to do it in the dark with some spotlights, two hours from walking outside to cleaning up. Myself only, no help, and only had to jack up the passenger side a little bit to get the old exhaust out. The GM borla kit sounds absolutely perfect, actually a little louder than I expected but still quiet in the cab. Fit was dead on.

Any sound clips?

Posted
Any sound clips?

Not that I can get with my iPhone that are decent. There are a few on YouTube I found that are pretty accurate if you search. It’s got a good startup note and isn’t too loud under load. Lay into it and you hear it real good. Cruising around town or highway there is no drone or ‘helicopter’ noise in V4. It is a very good quality and I am very happy with it. I do think the flapper valve makes all the difference.

Again, I found it for $999, tips were $116, and got 5% off.
Posted

I also had the overpriced GM Borla dual rear exit exhaust installed on my 2018 SIlverado 5.3.   It is significantly -  but not obnoxiously - louder than stock and plenty loud for me.  You definitely know it is there at all times.    My only gripe would be that the rear pipes of this set hang down much too far, especially since I went with muffler shop 3" tips instead of the more expensive larger 4" Borla tips.    Apparently it will void the warranty if I have the shop move the pipes up, but I'll probably have that done soon regardless.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 3,061 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...