Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Did anyone notice a change in the way they drive once you can "hear" your truck. I think I tend to be a bit more aggressive now.  Gotta watch that or Johnny Law will get me.

Posted
Did anyone notice a change in the way they drive once you can "hear" your truck. I think I tend to be a bit more aggressive now.  Gotta watch that or Johnny Law will get me.
I think I actually drove much more conservative when I had my MBRP catback on my truck. I believe since I could hear it so much better it subconsciously made me think I was pushing harder on the gas pedal so I was always easing up on the gas.
That and the fact that i remote started my truck at a job as I was walking up to look out the window to see if it had snowed again... One of the guys I work for was parked next to me (passenger side where the exhaust exits) as I the truck roared to life he threw his hands up and jumped lol. Oops.. Didn't see him there. Couldn't help cracking up but I did feel bad.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/16/2018 at 2:36 PM, mferry22 said:

No I have a 2017 GMC Sierra SLT with the 6.2L. Maybe I'm just getting old but I think its a bit too loud but the factory exhaust is ridiculously quiet, I can't hear it running from inside my house. I'm wondering if the gm performance exhaust by corsa would be quieter inside the cab because they tune the ANC with the exhaust. Its just an expensive price to pay if it's still too loud.

I have the GMPP Corsa 3.5" on my 2017 w/6.2, has a throaty sound when accelerating that I like to hear. At lower speeds around town it does have a little drone in 4 cylinder mode however I usually have my foot in it so it rarely sees 4 cyl mode.

Posted
11 hours ago, NemesisC5 said:

I have the GMPP Corsa 3.5" on my 2017 w/6.2, has a throaty sound when accelerating that I like to hear. At lower speeds around town it does have a little drone in 4 cylinder mode however I usually have my foot in it so it rarely sees 4 cyl mode.

What is this 4 cylinder mode you speak of? I have banished such things.

Posted

My Ultimate Set Up:

Speed Engineering Headers

Dual 3" X-Pipes

Dual 3" Magnaflows

Full 3" Dual System

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Rob Okray said:

What is this 4 cylinder mode you speak of? I have banished such things.

Mine will soon be banished as well. I've read the 2019's may have single cylinder mode...I bet that sounds good.

Posted

Hey Guys ,

New to this Forum but a long time member of the Corvette Forum. I have a 2017 Sierra "All Terrain" with the factory cat back option at the time. Its marketed by GM but I think its made by Corsa. I also added the "Twisted Steel" Y-Pipe that AFE makes with the high flow cats. It really woke the truck up and got rid of the flattened out part of the exhaust I can't stand. The problem is, after a couple of weeks, it has started to throw codes as the cats flow faster than the two O2 sensors are calibrated for. Initially I was told the truck wouldn't require a tune, but now it appears otherwise. I am not willing to trade my warranty for a tune as of yet. I am going to sell my slightly used Y-Pipe and return to stock. Has anybody else used that set-up and not experienced any issues?? Thanks in advance...........

Posted
On 3/20/2018 at 12:38 PM, NemesisC5 said:

Mine will soon be banished as well. I've read the 2019's may have single cylinder mode...I bet that sounds good.

What is this Sorcery you speak of? Blaspheme, I say! Seriously, how in blue blazes does that balance?

Posted
5 hours ago, SFREW62 said:

Hey Guys ,

New to this Forum but a long time member of the Corvette Forum. I have a 2017 Sierra "All Terrain" with the factory cat back option at the time. Its marketed by GM but I think its made by Corsa. I also added the "Twisted Steel" Y-Pipe that AFE makes with the high flow cats. It really woke the truck up and got rid of the flattened out part of the exhaust I can't stand. The problem is, after a couple of weeks, it has started to throw codes as the cats flow faster than the two O2 sensors are calibrated for. Initially I was told the truck wouldn't require a tune, but now it appears otherwise. I am not willing to trade my warranty for a tune as of yet. I am going to sell my slightly used Y-Pipe and return to stock. Has anybody else used that set-up and not experienced any issues?? Thanks in advance...........

The cat back on the All Terrain made by TMG aka Corsa is the same I purchased through GMPP. I considered the AFE Y-pipe but was concerned it would likely throw codes and for $700+ I was not ready to take a chance that I'd have to purchase a tune as well voiding warranty. Post a sound clip if you don'y mind.

Posted
1 hour ago, Rob Okray said:

What is this Sorcery you speak of? Blaspheme, I say! Seriously, how in blue blazes does that balance?

Blaspheme indeed, I'll need counseling the day I hear a V8 running on 1 cylinder.... 

  • Like 1
Posted

NemesisC5,

 Hey aren't you on the Corvette Forum also? Name sounds very familiar.....As far as the sound clip goes, I have already removed the y-pipe and boxed it back up in its original box.  I would describe the sound with it on as being deeper and more performance oriented. It was loud on initial start up but after that it just sounded really good. Like I said earlier, it woke the truck up. The throttle response was better and it reached rpm much quicker. If you know anybody that might be interested, I am going to sell it for half of what I have in it. I am going to price it at $450 shipped. At most it has 2-300 miles on it. My user name on the Corvette Forum is SDF if you want to look me up. I have to have 50 posts on here before I can put it in the "For Sale" section. Thanks for the reply............

Posted
12 hours ago, SFREW62 said:

NemesisC5,

 Hey aren't you on the Corvette Forum also? Name sounds very familiar.....As far as the sound clip goes, I have already removed the y-pipe and boxed it back up in its original box.  I would describe the sound with it on as being deeper and more performance oriented. It was loud on initial start up but after that it just sounded really good. Like I said earlier, it woke the truck up. The throttle response was better and it reached rpm much quicker. If you know anybody that might be interested, I am going to sell it for half of what I have in it. I am going to price it at $450 shipped. At most it has 2-300 miles on it. My user name on the Corvette Forum is SDF if you want to look me up. I have to have 50 posts on here before I can put it in the "For Sale" section. Thanks for the reply............

Yep that's me on CF. I have plans to modify exhaust pre-catback just not settled on which way I'm going, catted or no cats with CMR Diablo tune cats turned off. I frequent a few forums gathering intel, the hot topic going is GM's new 4.2L DOHC TT Caddy motor likely a precursor of what we'll see in GM's top performing cars and in time our trucks as well.   

Posted
On 3/21/2018 at 9:02 PM, NemesisC5 said:

Blaspheme indeed, I'll need counseling the day I hear a V8 running on 1 cylinder.... 

On that note, I had to bring the old girl to the stealer today and removed my Range AFM disabler beforehand thinking they might spot it. Sure enough, first thing they do is plug in, even though it did not need plugging in. Ha! can't catch me though! Range slips under the radar. 

Posted
On that note, I had to bring the old girl to the stealer today and removed my Range AFM disabler beforehand thinking they might spot it. Sure enough, first thing they do is plug in, even though it did not need plugging in. Ha! can't catch me though! Range slips under the radar. 
I think I'd find a new dealership! I would have rolled some heads if they were simply looking for a tune and it was unrelated to your service request.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...