Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Has anyone noticed their leaf springs spreading apart after installing shackles and removing the factory lift block? Got underneath today and noticed all my noise is coming from the forward part of the leaf springs on both sides. Also if I shake the truck side to side hard enough you can hear them moving. I had the dealer retorque the ubolts last week.

Edited by y0ureviltwin
Posted (edited)

FYI, here is the carrier bearing kit for the CCLB trucks. http://www.belltech.com/catalog/product/view/id/14085/category/4/

 

 

Has anyone noticed their leaf springs spreading apart after installing shackles and removing the factory lift block? Got underneath today and noticed all my noise is coming from the forward part of the leaf springs on both sides. Also if I shake the truck side to side hard enough you can hear them moving. I had the dealer retorque the ubolts last week.

 

Once the u bolts are tightened the leaf springs shouldnt be able to move. Now if the installer didnt clamp the leaf springs prior to loosening everything, he may have created an issue. I know the front of the leaf springs should not get removed or even touched during a shackle install. Also if your u bolts are coming loose you should replace them with new ones. New ones will prevent the nuts from coming loose. Theres also a video in this thread that shows the reason new u bolts should be used each time you have to u bolt them. Also check to make sure the bolt going through the center of the leaf springs is installed. If they removed it and forgot to replace it, that may cause some issues.

Edited by DirtyMarcus
  • Like 1
Posted

Has anyone noticed their leaf springs spreading apart after installing shackles and removing the factory lift block? Got underneath today and noticed all my noise is coming from the forward part of the leaf springs on both sides. Also if I shake the truck side to side hard enough you can hear them moving. I had the dealer retorque the ubolts last week.

I put leaf spring clamps about 6 inches ahead of the forward u-bolt, and clamped it down solid. I torqued the clamp bolts, and the u-bolts to 60 ft lbs. That seemed to not only fix the issue, it also made the truck feel more solid during takeoff, and braking.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I've come to the conclusion that the shop who did the install is just shoddy, it's going back in on Wednesday so they can install 2" shims, but they still say they did not cause this.

post-141251-0-90157600-1432645114_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-90157600-1432645114_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-90157600-1432645114_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-90157600-1432645114_thumb.jpg

Edited by y0ureviltwin
Posted

your picture of your leaf sping is how all of them will look when you install shackles it raises the rear up 2 inches- nothing to worry about. But like the other guy said if they did not install center pin in leaf spings that is a different story-look at the center of the leaf sping in between u bolts if you have a bolt going through the center your good.

Posted (edited)

your picture of your leaf sping is how all of them will look when you install shackles it raises the rear up 2 inches- nothing to worry about. But like the other guy said if they did not install center pin in leaf spings that is a different story-look at the center of the leaf sping in between u bolts if you have a bolt going through the center your good.

Well i do see a bolt and nut on the top but on the bottom it looks like a hole.

post-141251-0-89170500-1432677502_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-84395800-1432677610_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-89170500-1432677502_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-84395800-1432677610_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-89170500-1432677502_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-84395800-1432677610_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-89170500-1432677502_thumb.jpg

post-141251-0-84395800-1432677610_thumb.jpg

Edited by y0ureviltwin
Posted (edited)

I've come to the conclusion that the shop who did the install is just shoddy, it's going back in on Wednesday so they can install 2" shims, but they still say they did not cause this.

Looks normal to me even before the drop. It is supposed to be that way. Under normal driving condition, your using the first two leafs. Under payload, the first two leafs flatten out, and hit the third leaf to give more support for the added load. If all three were pulled together at the same time all the time, the ride would be stiffer, and potentially higher with no load. I only added a spring strap on each side to help control axle wrap. I have 2 degree shims, but I checked, and rechecked my driveshaft angle out of the transmission, and it is almost dead parallel with the truck sitting on the ground. I may not use the shims.

Edited by IMPALADAKID
Posted

If you look at one of those pictures you will see it's not lined up correctly either, i did some measurements and it's about 1/2 inch off. The clunking sound is getting worse especially hitting a speed bump, i sprayed the leaf springs with water and no more clunking.

Posted

If you look at one of those pictures you will see it's not lined up correctly either, i did some measurements and it's about 1/2 inch off. The clunking sound is getting worse especially hitting a speed bump, i sprayed the leaf springs with water and no more clunking.

What are you saying is a 1/2" off? The leaf springs? That bolt going through the leaf spring sits inside the perch that is welded to the axle. This is what helps prevent the leaf springs from shifting around, in addition to the u bolts. When you take the truck back to the shop, make sure they tightened the shackles with the truck under load. You can do this two ways, either with the truck back on the ground or jack up the axle enough to simulate a full load. Im starting to suspect the noise is the shackles binding up from not being properly tightened.

Posted

The center pin is not supposed to go through the axle tube; if it went through, there would a whole lot of bigger problems.

Posted

What are you saying is a 1/2" off? The leaf springs? That bolt going through the leaf spring sits inside the perch that is welded to the axle. This is what helps prevent the leaf springs from shifting around, in addition to the u bolts. When you take the truck back to the shop, make sure they tightened the shackles with the truck under load. You can do this two ways, either with the truck back on the ground or jack up the axle enough to simulate a full load. Im starting to suspect the noise is the shackles binding up from not being properly tightened.

 

Well if you look at the pictures the frame doesn't align with leaf springs, the noise is definitely not coming from the shackles, when i spray water on the leaf springs it doesn't crunch as loudly

Posted

Well that's not good, shop asked me which way i wanted the shims facing, I wouldn't even know, reading through the forums is of no help as some say fat end faces front while others say fat end facing the rear.

Posted

Well that's not good, shop asked me which way i wanted the shims facing, I wouldn't even know, reading through the forums is of no help as some say fat end faces front while others say fat end facing the rear.

Take it elsewhere. They should be measuring the angle of the driveline to determine if you even need shims. Like I said its not something you can eyeball. If I were you I'd take it to a 4wheel parts store. The deal with driveline issues from lifting trucks all the time. Plus since they are a corporation, they will get it right or you can take it back. The only down side it they are probably more expensive than most places. For them to add shims, carrier bearing kits, and get all the driveline measured correctly on my truck its running me about $300, $100 of which is parts.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,916 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...