Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, SirenRed16 said:

Are any of you lowered guys losing any turning radius if so how much?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

YES.  I have 22" wheels with 285/40 tires and a 1.5" spacer lowered about 2" in the front and I do not have the same turning radius.  When I was lower it was flat out terrible - maybe a turn and a half before I rubbed.  At 2" it is reasonable - about 2.5 turns before rubbing.  If your wheel is not centered in the wheel well it really detracts from your turning radius.

Posted
YES.  I have 22" wheels with 285/40 tires and a 1.5" spacer lowered about 2" in the front and I do not have the same turning radius.  When I was lower it was flat out terrible - maybe a turn and a half before I rubbed.  At 2" it is reasonable - about 2.5 turns before rubbing.  If your wheel is not centered in the wheel well it really detracts from your turning radius.
I'll hopefully be at 4/7 by Saturday, I'll be using Mcgaughys so I hope that'll keep my wheel centered.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Posted
10 minutes ago, SirenRed16 said:

I'll hopefully be at 4/7 by Saturday, I'll be using Mcgaughys so I hope that'll keep my wheel centered.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

It won't but its not bad.  Only way to keep the wheel centered is new arms and arm mounts.  Dont worry about it  as ling as youre using spindles with struts. Its not bad at all

Posted
It won't but its not bad.  Only way to keep the wheel centered is new arms and arm mounts.  Dont worry about it  as ling as youre using spindles with struts. Its not bad at all
I finally pulled the trigger with the Mcgaughys 34270. Truck goes in tomorrow after work.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Posted
1 minute ago, SirenRed16 said:

I finally pulled the trigger with the Mcgaughys 34270. Truck goes in tomorrow after work.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

I have the same kit but cast spindle version.  I like it for what it is

Posted
I have the same kit but cast spindle version.  I like it for what it is
Really hoping the kit treats me right, took me long enough to decide on a kit lol

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Posted
12 minutes ago, SirenRed16 said:

Really hoping the kit treats me right, took me long enough to decide on a kit lol

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

Its been good to me. But im starting to switch stuff out now just because im bored

Posted
32 minutes ago, SirenRed16 said:

I'll hopefully be at 4/7 by Saturday, I'll be using Mcgaughys so I hope that'll keep my wheel centered.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

For reference

IMG_20181030_173340.jpg

IMG_20181031_121030.jpg

Posted
Are any of you lowered guys losing any turning radius if so how much?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk


I actually didn't lose much of my turning radius at all, and I'm dropped 4/6 with 22x10 wheels and 305/40r22 tires. Maybe my truck is a unicorn, but I turn great and only rub slightly at or near full lock.



Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
13 hours ago, Nasty said:

It won't but its not bad.  Only way to keep the wheel centered is new arms and arm mounts.  Dont worry about it  as ling as youre using spindles with struts. Its not bad at all

Question: With a lowering kit, are new arms and arm mounts available from anywhere to solve this? (Sorry, my OCD makes me a perfectionist and I like to know every detail of what to expect :))

Posted
17 minutes ago, krunch said:

Question: With a lowering kit, are new arms and arm mounts available from anywhere to solve this? (Sorry, my OCD makes me a perfectionist and I like to know every detail of what to expect :))

You have 1 choice as of now. Thats twisted metal works arms    i was going to do them but minimam wheel size is 22. I run small wheels so its a no go for me.    If youre only going 4" in front its not bad. Ive actually forgotten about it

Posted
1 hour ago, Nasty said:

You have 1 choice as of now. Thats twisted metal works arms    i was going to do them but minimam wheel size is 22. I run small wheels so its a no go for me.    If youre only going 4" in front its not bad. Ive actually forgotten about it

So does both the McG kit and the Bell kit cause this issue?

 

Krunch

Posted
18 minutes ago, krunch said:

So does both the McG kit and the Bell kit cause this issue?

 

Krunch

Chevrolet cause this issue.  By mounting the upper arm at an angle

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Is there any real difference in a 2wd or 4wd spindle if they both use the same control arm style?? I've been looking for a 2/4 or 3/5 kit for my 2014 CC 4wd. I've read through just about this entire thread. It seams like guys have used control arms to lower their trucks but every body seem to say stay away from the IHR arms. I like the idea of using spindles however most of those I find seem to be for 2wd trucks that why I ask if there is really a difference. I've been emailing with Belltech and haven't gotten an answer from them as of yet. Tried to get ahold of Mcgaughy's but figure they are at SEMA this week so no luck there. I do really like the Mcgaughy's kit if it would work for 4wd. I don't really see why it wouldn't other than what thy have on their website.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Is there any real difference in a 2wd or 4wd spindle if they both use the same control arm style?? I've been looking for a 2/4 or 3/5 kit for my 2014 CC 4wd. I've read through just about this entire thread. It seams like guys have used control arms to lower their trucks but every body seem to say stay away from the IHR arms. I like the idea of using spindles however most of those I find seem to be for 2wd trucks that why I ask if there is really a difference. I've been emailing with Belltech and haven't gotten an answer from them as of yet. Tried to get ahold of Mcgaughy's but figure they are at SEMA this week so no luck there. I do really like the Mcgaughy's kit if it would work for 4wd. I don't really see why it wouldn't other than what thy have on their website.
 
The 4wd spindles allow clearance for the cv axles, there isn't a huge difference, but they are different. Mcgaughys does have 4wd spindles, you can couple those with a lowering spring, or strut to go lower than 2".

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...