Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey guys. I bought the Tonno Pro Hard Fold cover last week for $500 shipped via Fedex to my front door for $500. It gives you the quality of a true hard cover without losing the look of the sleek vinyl cover. It took me about 5 minutes to install. It's pouring down rain here in NC today and my bed is nice and dry. The cover could not fit any better. It's a tri-fold cover that has an aluminum base to give it 350 lbs of support covered in marine grade vinyl that has a 10 year warranty. The structure has a lifetime warranty.

 

I looked around at many hard and soft covers. This cover gives me the best of both worlds for $500. That works perfect for me. They're are two licensed sellers on ebay that advertise them for $529 but they accept offers. If you offer $500, they will accept. You can't beat this cover for that price. Well worth the money.

 

Thanks.

 

Here are some pics of the the Tonno Pro Hard Fold cover if anyone is interested. Sorry for the Ford truck picture but it was a really good picture of the cover.

tonno

tonno 2

tonno 3

Tonno Cover

Edited by LeeDowney
Posted

I bought the one from the dealer says GMC on it tri fold hard with vinyl cover. No leaks, works good. He said it was the best made. He said it must be true, like the internet. 800 dollars, lifetime installed

Posted

Got the retrax pro installed today. Review coming in a week or so.

Now all I need is my exhaust tip (9 weeks and counting).

Posted

Great thread. I had a Flex on my 2013 I really liked. Looking for another for my 2014 but I have different requirements now. Priority is light weight. 2nd is flush fit.

 

Just about every bed cover discussion on the internet pretty much mirrors this one. Can someone point me in a different direction?

Posted

Received and installed my roll X today. Happy and pleased. Total cost to the door $570. Good deal.

 

That is a smoking deal, most of the prices I saw for Roll-X when I was looking was 700-825 which is one of the reasons I went with the Fold-A-Cover G4 Elite over the Roll-X. Had I seen that price on a new Roll-X I may have bought that one instead.....but oh well, I'm happy with mine and you're happy with yours so thats what matters!

Posted

Truxedo tonneau trax.. Love having the adjustable load tie down points that come with it.

Posted

Guys with the Truxedo Low Pro Qt can you post up a pic? I'm pretty set on one I just wanna see it installed on our trucks. Thanks.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

post-124599-0-51973600-1392232593_thumb.jpgpost-124599-0-26486100-1392232603_thumb.jpgpost-124599-0-31891300-1392232620_thumb.jpgpost-124599-0-83030500-1392232645_thumb.pngpost-124599-0-06237800-1392232662_thumb.jpg

 

Diamondback SE with LineX

 

I really love these covers. I had one on my H3T and liked it enough to get one for my '14 Silverado. You don't see very many of these since the company is small and most of the covers are made to order (handmade in the USA!). There is a thick rubber seal which does a good job of keeping the water out - only a few drops from heavy rain or pressure washer. Mine is the SE which holds 400 lbs on top. The HD holds 1600 lbs I believe. You can get a kit that adds some rails and has some ramps so you can carry ATV's on top. Both the front and rear panels open so you have full bed access. If you have a load on top of the cover, you can still access the bed. Panel removal is a one-man operation - no tools needed. You can also fold the panel all the way over and strap it down. I believe I paid $1300. If you like the look of polished aluminum diamon-tread, it's $200-300 cheaper without the LineX. I know it costs more than a soft cover, but it does lock and keep your stuff safe & dry. Considering the cost of a fiberglass cover is about the same but less functional, this is definitely a good investment. Check out diamonbacktruckcovers.com. They have other configuations and more affordable covers if you arent concerned about hauling on top.

post-124599-0-51973600-1392232593_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-26486100-1392232603_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-31891300-1392232620_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-83030500-1392232645_thumb.png

post-124599-0-06237800-1392232662_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-51973600-1392232593_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-26486100-1392232603_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-31891300-1392232620_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-83030500-1392232645_thumb.png

post-124599-0-06237800-1392232662_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-51973600-1392232593_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-26486100-1392232603_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-31891300-1392232620_thumb.jpg

post-124599-0-83030500-1392232645_thumb.png

post-124599-0-06237800-1392232662_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Undercover Flex - You had a bad experience, but a lot of people have them and they seem to be pretty good otherwise. Undercover copied Bak, but Undercover improved the cover.

 

Undercover Classic, SE, and LUX: You can't beat them as far as waterproofing. All covers COVER the rails and tailgate and there is a large overhanging seal at the front. The bulb seal underneath the cover is a large two-bulb seal.

 

Fold-A-Cover (and Advance Cover) - If the installation includes hardware that installs inside the stake pockets, then you're OK. If it does not, do NOT buy the cover. If you get one, get the G4 Elite. Generally, it's an OK cover, but the seals that cover the piano hinges can break after a few years. The seals are replaceable though. Advance Cover is basically the same, company owners are cousins.

 

If you like a folding cover with locks, take a look at the Extang Encore. It offers more utility than the Fold-A-Cover. NOTE: There was a recall on the Encore. If you buy one, make sure it's the newest model which is NOT part of the recall. The new model will have a tether attached to the front panel.

Posted

Fold-A-Cover G4 Elite. The jury is still out as to whether it was worth $800. I like that it locks and opens front and back, but I don't like how the weather strip for the tailgate has to fill a large gap between the cover and the tailgate.

 

Also, when the cover is closed, the end pieces and the middle hinge stick up above the rails.

Posted

Is everyone that has the bakflip liking theirs? I am thinking about getting the G2. Maybe the undercover.

I need something easy to remove when I load my atv.

Posted

Is everyone that has the bakflip liking theirs? I am thinking about getting the G2. Maybe the undercover.

I need something easy to remove when I load my atv.

Stay away from the BAK. I had 3 of them in 6 years on my previous Tacoma. They don't hold up well over time, and BAK has crappy customer service. There are many unhappy BAK customers who bought a couple of years ago. I love the design of BAK, but they use substandard materials and charge a premium. The Undercover is a better quality product and competes directly with the Bak F1. I've only heard on person (imcrazy), here and on TacomaWorld who ever had an issue with the Undercover Flex. Many people will say the BAk is great, the question is how long have they owned the cover?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...