Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Or rain or fog. I fully support using headlights when it is prudent to do so. I use them on two lane roads where there are a lot of blind driveways and side roads. The slightest drizzle or rain, and i switch them on. Fog, of course. But I hate it when folks can't figure out to turn the damn things out when I am trying to back 70' of truck into a tight dock at night and I got their stupid headlights in my eyes while they wait for me. And the last thing I need is a 1700 lb bull to get ticked off by getting those stupid daylight driving lights in the eyes at night when I start my pickup out in a pasture. The arguments for such stuff is by those myopic folks that think the only way a pickup is used is by driving it down the road.

Posted (edited)

I've disabled DRL and auto headlight function by removing the return spring in the headlight switch.

The dashlight intensity is still linked to the light sensor, so I can tell when the computer thinks the lights should be on. There are many, many times the computer did not think they should be on, when in fact they should have been (in which cases I had manually turned them on). During my morning commutes, my dash light intensity will cycle sometimes half a dozen times due to tree canonpy cover etc... The entire time, my lights should be (and are because I manually turn them on) due to the fact that the rising sun is behind me, making it more difficult for other drivers to see me.

I shake my head most days when I am following someone and I see their taillights cycle on and off. Or I see people in full dark with only DRL on.

 

THIS is why I am so strongly opposed to DRL, auto headlight, and other features similar to them. They make stupid and lazy drivers that much dumber and lazier, and give them a false sense of security. Just like the people that turn the wrong way down a one way road or drive into a pond because their GPS told them to turn.

 

IMO, if knowing when to turn your lights on when needed and doing so is such a difficult task, then perhaps you shouldn't be driving...

Edited by kevin_nj
  • Like 3
Posted

This is the Diagram for the under hood fuse panel on the 2014 silverado LT Z71

 

attachicon.gifScreen shot 2014-01-30 at 2.58.35 PM.png

 

attachicon.gifScreen shot 2014-01-30 at 2.58.46 PM.png

 

attachicon.gifScreen shot 2014-01-30 at 2.58.55 PM.png

Very handy. Which fuse block is this - drivers or passenger? Can you post both please?

Posted

I've disabled DRL and auto headlight function by removing the return spring in the headlight switch.

The dashlight intensity is still linked to the light sensor, so I can tell when the computer thinks the lights should be on. There are many, many times the computer did not think they should be on, when in fact they should have been (in which cases I had manually turned them on). During my morning commutes, my dash light intensity will cycle sometimes half a dozen times due to tree canonpy cover etc... The entire time, my lights should be (and are because I manually turn them on) due to the fact that the rising sun is behind me, making it more difficult for other drivers to see me.

I shake my head most days when I am following someone and I see their taillights cycle on and off. Or I see people in full dark with only DRL on.

 

THIS is why I am so strongly opposed to DRL, auto headlight, and other features similar to them. They make stupid and lazy drivers that much dumber and lazier, and give them a false sense of security. Just like the people that turn the wrong way down a one way road or drive into a pond because their GPS told them to turn.

 

IMO, if knowing when to turn your lights on when needed and doing so is such a difficult task, then perhaps you shouldn't be driving...

Agreed, my 2012 Mercedes GL450 (x164) had the light control completely locked out. I wasn't even able to turn off the headlights without shutting the car off. It was some kind of a 'safety lighting package'. I'd cycle the light control and nothing would happen. Night or day, the control was completely locked out. Unreal.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Agreed, my 2012 Mercedes GL450 (x164) had the light control completely locked out. I wasn't even able to turn off the headlights without shutting the car off. It was some kind of a 'safety lighting package'. I'd cycle the light control and nothing would happen. Night or day, the control was completely locked out. Unreal.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm curious, did you know that before you bought it? Not looking to bash you, just curious.

If I knew there was no way to bypass such a system I don't think I'd buy that vehicle. The problem is I see that becoming more of the norm, and my selection of vehicles to purchase will be decreasing.

Posted

I've never had a problem with my 2014 Sierra's light control, works fine and they come on just fine and go off fine. Our Audi SQ5 has an option in the menu to change if the auto lights come on early/normal/late.

Posted

Very handy. Which fuse block is this - drivers or passenger? Can you post both please?

Drivers side under hood, I wasn't aware there was a passengers side fuse block??

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Drivers side under hood, I wasn't aware there was a passengers side fuse block??

It's not the under hood one. It's the driver's side dash fuse block.

I just tapped into it. I believe there is one under the hood also. But I am having a hell of a time trying to find an ignition activated fuse to tap into on the passenger's side for use with my radar detector and dash camera, so as not to kill the battery when vehicle is unoccupied. Can anyone suggest one to tie into?

Edited by Mad Max
Posted

It's not the under hood one. It's the driver's side dash fuse block.

I just tapped into it. I believe there is one under the hood also. But I am having a hell of a time trying to find an ignition activated fuse to tap into on the passenger's side for use with my radar detector and dash camera, so as not to kill the battery when vehicle is unoccupied. Can anyone suggest one to tie into?

I tapped into one on the drivers side had to use a micro2 add a fuse deal like this https://www.google.com/search?q=mini+fuse+tap&safe=strict&rls=com.microsoft:en-US:IE-Address&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjVj8SBrarJAhVJXhoKHef_D8oQsAQIRw&biw=1920&bih=1052#safe=strict&tbm=isch&q=micro2+fuse+tap&imgrc=LYxagYpfa62X_M%3A I will take a picture for you later today

  • Like 1
Posted

I have those too but can't find the right location to plug it into! Looking forward to the picture and description of what the fuse does. Thanks Man!

Posted

Which fuse on the driver's side was it?

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I did this after work and it took longer to get the fuse panel and trim piece off than it did to do this mod... eazy peazy!

 

RT

 

Hmm, any tips or tutorial on how to get this fuse panel and trim pieces off (as I've had bad luck breaking plastic trim pieces in the past). :(

Posted (edited)

post-147128-0-77581800-1450544468_thumb.jpgdon't know if you want to do this, I have a 2014 Silverado with hid lights in stalled. put led strips between the headlights and wired as my diagram shows. with the addition of two relays my led's are my drl's and just for fun when I put the signal on it turns the led off an on when the signal flashes.

post-147128-0-77581800-1450544468_thumb.jpg

post-147128-0-77581800-1450544468_thumb.jpg

post-147128-0-77581800-1450544468_thumb.jpg

Edited by silveradosid
  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Can anyone point out the parking light wire on the truck harness for the headlights. My aftermarkets didn't come with a parking light wire oddly enough and i'm not quite sure I have the right wire. The relay I have isn't seemingly working correctly.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

attachicon.gifUntitled59.jpgdon't know if you want to do this, I have a 2014 Silverado with hid lights in stalled. put led strips between the headlights and wired as my diagram shows. with the addition of two relays my led's are my drl's and just for fun when I put the signal on it turns the led off an on when the signal flashes.

Can you post a picture with your strips on during the day? Maybe ~20 ft back?

 

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
    • 1/2 qt over full ain`t gonna hurt $h!t. Most times, a whole qt won`t either. Most have windage trays now. As long as the crank isn`t slapping itself in the oil, it`s not the end of the world.   We used to overfill 1 qt at the track, at race time. Better to have it over full than having the pan sucked dry at 6500 rpm`s.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...