Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So heres the verdict on my rusted out 2011 Z71 chassis...............After 2 days at the dealership, the verdict is.................drum roll please..........................Bring it back in January so our corrosion rep can see it because he's in the midwest right now........Sure, all of us have so much time dropping cars off, getting rides, waiting for shuttle service. I said heres my address, you tell him to come see me at my work, Im done, truck has been here 2 times in a month, a total of 3 days and no answers.

 

F**k off Chevy.......After numerous fleet Silverados, Suburbans, and Tahoes,,,(and my Cadillac CTS-V that had 6 dealer visits for stabilitrak engaging , which I was so patient and bit my tongue),,,,,,,,,I'm crossing to the other side, Ford and Dodge here I come. We own a piston ring factory in LA and the fleet is going to be Chevy free come 2016.

 

 

Best response was from a sales guy....." just trade it in and get a new one" .....

Posted

Hi Everyone. I am new to the site and found the information very helpful. I just bought a brand new 2013 leftover Tahoe on 7/22. After 2 weeks and only one tiny rain (car is parked in a garage) I am blown away with the amount of rust that is suddenly popping up on the frame. I contacted the dealer and they referred to #PI0281D which has nothing to do with rusting of the frame. (That had to do with component rust...something I'm not concerned with.) I have always been super loyal and between myself and my family, we have 8 Chevy trucks. To make sure I wasn't losing my mind, I looked under my 2005 Trailblazer (200k miles) and my wife's 2007 Equinox (100k miles) and there is hardly a single spot of rust. I travel to northern Vermont frequently during the winter and I already know this is going to be a huge problem. To make things worse, I took a plane all the way to upstate NY to pick up the vehicle since that's where I found it on the lot. I am going to attach some photos. Any advice would be great. I want to make sure this gets reported and fixed early on especially before the winter. I called GM but they claim there is no issue they are aware of. I guess my next stop is to file a complaint with the State and the NHTSA. Please let me know what you guys think. I appreciate it.

Dude, yours might look like mine in 23 months ??????

Posted
......

 

 

Best response was from a sales guy....." just trade it in and get a new one" .....

LOL!! They don't tell you .... the new ones are even WORSE. :lol: I couldn't be a GM salesman, and get a full night's sleep ....

  • Like 2
Posted

Hi Everyone,

I just wanted to give you an update. The dealer/GM took care of my issue. The service bulletin is #PI0564D. (Sept 5, 2013) THIS IS THE BULLETIN YOU NEED.

 

First, an undercoating acid/emulsion(?) was applied to remove all the rust. I guess the same stuff is used to restore old antique frames. Everything was then recoated with a surface coat. (TSA4363F Undercoat.)

 

As of today, everything looks factory new. I'll give you an update once we get through the winter.

Hope this is somewhat helpful.

 

Carl

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I have had same problem with my 13 Silverado. However, there is a simple solution that I have used for two (2) years now. "Liquid Electrical Tape" This stuff looks and acts like the factory coating, application is a breeze and it doesn't wear off. It's cheap and a hell of a lot easier than being without your truck during the complaint and repair process with your dealer.

Granted, if you have a large scale problem then the dealer process would be the way to go. Fortunately, mine has been limited to a few trouble spots.

Edited by 13_Silverado
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Hi Everyone,

 

I just wanted to give you an update. The dealer/GM took care of my issue. The service bulletin is #PI0564D. (Sept 5, 2013) THIS IS THE BULLETIN YOU NEED.

 

First, an undercoating acid/emulsion(?) was applied to remove all the rust. I guess the same stuff is used to restore old antique frames. Everything was then recoated with a surface coat. (TSA4363F Undercoat.)

 

As of today, everything looks factory new. I'll give you an update once we get through the winter.

 

Hope this is somewhat helpful

Carl

The bulletin is in the GM system and is for the tech not a customer to demand , sweet lord I wish you guys knew WTF a bulletin is for ,

 

You couldn't be anymore distrusting than spout off a TSB # to a dealer service writer never mind a tech who has to read it in the work order , ,

 

Paranoid is a word that comes to mind ,,,,

 

Get a grip

Edited by govtech4
Posted

Is referencing a TSB really that bad? I've done it many times and have always been correct and get the exact service I need. For someone who does know what they are talking about, including a TSB to reference shouldn't upset anyone (service writer or tech) IMHO

  • Like 2
Posted

Considering that the local dealers are somewhat incompetent, I think it is good to have documentation just in case there is pushback from them. For the record, I have never had any issues with the frame coating on my truck.

Posted

Well, Im just sitting waiting and waiting for this " corrosion rep" to contact me sometime in January while my truck continues to rust.........I want to fix it myself, which Im sure I'll end up doing. But after dropping 58K it just feels like a rip off.....I went to the dealer last week, and even the 2015's on the lot are showing rust beginning on the lips and welds of the frames...dealer in 2.3 miles from the ocean in SoCal.............

Posted

Yes, Im close to the beach, trucks entire life which is approaching 3 years not 30 years. Dealership said thats why the rust is so bad. I replied " so you're meaning to tell me the 300,000 Chevys that are close to the beach in So Cal are all like this ?".........Nice product GM, even the metal on my seat brackets in 2nd row is rusted, garbage.......

 

I would be mad/frustrated as well. I do auto transport & when the used trucks/suv's are on the top deck, I get to see the various stages of rust on the bottom side. Some are perfect at 5 years & some look 50 years old at the same time frame among ALL the mfg's. Some are frame only, axles, others are suspension components while others are the entire under carriage. Again, there has been no rhyme or reason between them.

 

Have posted a photo before of a new 2012 or 13 F150 that still had the window sticker & the rear axle was completely covered in surface rust. Moved a 2010 Ford Escape last summer at an auction that the rear quarter panels were completely rusted through around the wheel wells. Not just a bubble or two, but rusted through. :nonod: Not bashing Ford, but those were two of the more extreme cases I remember off hand. Ram seems to have more issue initially with the suspension stuff & Toyota has been more so the frame rails. GM has been a variable. Personally own a 2013 Sierra & nothing in terms rust to speak of, yet.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

Best response was from a sales guy....." just trade it in and get a new one" .....

 

I always liked that one. They want to make you believe the new ones get better, and the issues get fixed plus they get to make another sale. I've found the exact opposite to be true in most of the areas that are important.

 

My response to them anymore is, no thanks I think I need to go back a few years, and rebuild it my way which is the correct way.

  • Like 1
Posted

Ford has historically never painted their differentials. The OE GM paint is thin on the diffs, but at least there is some. I wnet over mine with a good coat of gloss Rustoleum before any surface rust began.

Posted (edited)

The frame paint of the F-150 is so much better than the Silverado. A coworker bought a 2014 F-150, and it has a nice hard even painted frame. Seems durable.

 

The wax/rubber crap GM uses seems to fall or wear off most of their trucks that I've been around. 99, 06, 07, 07.5, 09. Those are just the years I've seen it on that my family has or had. Dad also test drove an 07 & 08 that were the same way.

 

Now these trucks have 100k miles or more on them, but my point is that the frame coating does not hold up in my experience.

Edited by Daryl Z71
Posted

Happy New Year to all my rusting away brothers.............we shall see what 2015 brings to my rusting away chassis........


Happy New Year to all my rusting away brothers.............we shall see what 2015 brings to my rusting away chassis........

Posted

Hear! Hear!

 

My transmission is making a loud clunk when shifting into second - has since 20k miles. Now at 73k it's getting louder. Looks like '15 means more bilking of funds ... :nonod:

 

Happy New Year! :ughdance:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...