Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

"Over the years, many control arms have evolved from their humble stamped steel beginnings to elaborate cast aluminum pieces that are stronger and lighter than ever before. Being cast aluminum, they don't corrode quite like the steel control arms do, but since aluminum is a softer metal, they do bend and crack when things go wrong. This means that simple fender-benders or pot holes can potentially damage them, throwing the alignment way off."

Posted

Did a test drive and inspection yesterday.
The control arms on mine are Steel. Not sure how that plays into all the others but for the record. This denali at least, has steel.

Posted

I was begining to believe it was the early production Z71's were steel control arms and they were making an advancement to using alum on the later release Z71's but from this, there really seems to be no rhyme or reason... I wish somebody FROM GM would chime in with reasoning for the mixed bag of control arms.

  • Like 2
Posted

There seems to be a theme where standard bed trucks are getting steel, short beds are getting aluminum. Mine--standard bed CC Denali with Z71--steel.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

There seems to be a theme where standard bed trucks are getting steel, short beds are getting aluminum. Mine--standard bed CC Denali with Z71--steel.

Well I think that post #48 has it right. Mine is a 6.2 CCSB LTZ 2wd Z60 high performance suspension with the steel control arms.

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Has anybody confirmed which models get the aluminum suspension?

 

Yes, the same ones that get steel. :lurk:

  • Like 1
  • 6 months later...
Posted

2015 LTZ Z71...steel upper and lower... got down, looked and put a magnet to both sides...seemed like the most efficient sure way to tell.

Posted

Cast iron arms have a black coating/paint. The aluminum arms are bare and silver-ish in appearance.

Posted

2014 Silverado Double Cab Z71 4x4 - steel

2015 GMC Sierra SLT Crew Cab 4x4 - steel

2015 Silverado LTZ Crew Cab 4x4 that I almost bought - steel

Posted

Steel may be a little heavier but the strength benefit provided by steel control arms out weighs the weight benefit in a truck that is used for anything considered " heavy duty " work. The trucks like Denali that aren't intended for rugged off-road use I'm sure benefit from the weight savings while traveling down the highway.

Posted (edited)

I don't believe there are cast iron control arms. I know the upper arms are forged steel. I'll take another look at my lowers, but I'd bet on forged steel. Same with the knuckles, forged.

 

Also, the aluminum arms and knuckles look forged to me as well.

 

As for which is better, I'd prefer to have the aluminum...assuming they did a good job designing them. But mine are steel. The aluminum arms should provide better suspension control, better road contact, etc..

 

Also, aluminum will, indeed, corrode. Very much so. Road salts will make it much worse. Keep them clean.

Edited by spurshot

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...