Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Rubberized coating is the worst option if the frame has any rust already. It'll look alright on the surface but you're just trapping the moisture, road salt, etc. underneath the surface. I've seen it accelerate corrosion when poorly applied.

Edited by HondaHawkGT
Posted

What can we use to repair this? What are they using at the factory?

Frame is dipped in wax at the factory.

Posted (edited)

Rubberized coating is the worst option if the frame has any rust already. It'll look alright on the surface but you're just trapping the moisture, road salt, etc. underneath the surface. I've seen it accelerate corrosion when poorly applied.

Doesn't moisture, road salt, etc, need oxygen to accelerate corrosion? Without oxygen how can rust thrive/survive?

Edited by steelcity
Posted (edited)

Doesn't moisture, road salt, etc, need oxygen to accelerate corrosion? Without oxygen how can rust thrive/survive?

 

Rubberized coating isn't a 100% hermetic seal there will always be areas with porosity or poor adhesion to the steel that serve as pathways for water, salt and oxygen to travel.

Google is your friend. Toyota and Jeep owners have been struggling with rust for decades and have tried everything. New owners will try rubberized undercoattong and when they peel it back to see how it's working, they're horrified by how much rust is underneath. It'd be a nice simple option if it did work but it doesn't.

Edited by HondaHawkGT
Posted

Hardly any miles and a fair bit of rust In the past I have used rust check in a can, it worked pretty well. And you can reapply whenever you want. I would rather do it myself than have the dealership spray black rust paint on it.

Posted

I'm taking my truck in on the 20th over the rust forming on the frame for this very same reason. It's so sad they cut corners like this.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Posted

When will GM use some other coating on their full-size truck frames?

 

The new Colorado/Canyon frames appear to be painted rather than the wax-type coating.

 

I've been thinking of upgrading from my current truck but this issue is a sore spot that GM should have addressed years ago.

 

I would much rather see a painted frame from the factory, and then have it professionally undercoated/rustproofed as I live in an area where road salt and liquid de-icers are used.

You can get the frame powder coated after the fact?

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Posted

You can get the frame powder coated after the fact?

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

?, I had my truck rustproofed & undercoated by a local Ziebart shop, anything has to help other than the wax coating from GM that we have all seen flake or wear off.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I think GM should hold the frame mfg accountable for this because they build and Coat the frame . By that I mean if the wax cant stay on for at least 5 years because of careless application . With the price of these trucks is 60 months asking too much ? This fix of lets spray some black rust paint or black coatings on spots that are showing immediately and report to GM frame coating issue is resolved. My opinion is take the bed off and raise cab if you have to and strip frame down bare and apply a new coating even and everywhere. Hell GM jump on the frame mfg you sub these out to...hold them accountable for cost of a FIRST CLASS fix for GM customers . Hell the wax coating on my 05 silverado held up very well until about year 7 or so.

Posted

We don't know that GM isn't going after the frame plant/supplier. (OEM's recovering warranty cost from suppliers was common when I was in auto parts manufacturing. I suspect that they still are.)

 

We don't know that any changes to the process weren't asked for by GM. They would certainly would have had to have GM's approval if changes were made. It may also be that changes to material/process were required because of ever-changing environmental emission issues.

Posted

I think GM should hold the frame mfg accountable for this because they build and Coat the frame . By that I mean if the wax cant stay on for at least 5 years because of careless application . With the price of these trucks is 60 months asking too much ? This fix of lets spray some black rust paint or black coatings on spots that are showing immediately and report to GM frame coating issue is resolved. My opinion is take the bed off and raise cab if you have to and strip frame down bare and apply a new coating even and everywhere. Hell GM jump on the frame mfg you sub these out to...hold them accountable for cost of a FIRST CLASS fix for GM customers . Hell the wax coating on my 05 silverado held up very well until about year 7 or so.

I was under the impression that GM dipped the frames at the factory... That it was part of their process. Looking at my own when I had still had it you could tell there was no real adhesion to the frame by the wax. GM has been doing this wax for years. My 08 looked good, the 2010 Avalanche my wife owns looked good, the 2014 was literally flaking off. Something in the materials or the process changed. I don't think the wax will last forever, but I did expect it to last more than 8000 miles.

 

It wasn't as bad as others have shown pictures of, but bad enough after 1 winter I wanted it fixed. Got the "O hell son, that's normal" from the dealer. After everything else, I was done at that point.

  • Like 1
Posted

I see I wonder what Ram does to their frames. I haven't really heard anything bad about their frames.

They paint them. I have 8000 miles on my Ram and the frame looks pretty much the same as new. This is the same mileage I traded the Silverado in at. I am sure the Ram has issues that will creep up, but so far so good in my case.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 396 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...