Jump to content

Engine Temp running cool

wotexva99
 Share

Recommended Posts

03olblue New Member

03olblue

Posted
Posted (edited)

My truck is doing the same thing, had a thermostat keeping the truck around 185-190 and flushed coolant and changed thermostat because I thought it may be stuck open but still running at 185-190. 2001 Silverado with 4.8 and 5 speed manual. Any advice? Would like to keep it at 210 to ensure good gas mileage/parts wear

Edited by 03olblue
CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, 03olblue said:

My truck is doing the same thing, had a thermostat keeping the truck around 185-190 and flushed coolant and changed thermostat because I thought it may be stuck open but still running at 185-190. 2001 Silverado with 4.8 and 5 speed manual. Any advice? Would like to keep it at 210 to ensure good gas mileage/parts wear

 

What your truck is doing is completely normal though.  A new stock thermostat is suppose to keep the running temp at 185-195. Don't forget that the cluster reading does not always match the real coolant temp that a scan tool would show.

 

The engine is designed around that temp, so there won't be any extra wear on parts. You'd have to block off a ton of airflow to the radiator if you wanted it to run at 210 all the time, plus your clutch fan would be running all the time reducing your mpg.

dkjbama Enthusiast

dkjbama

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, rjgti said:

fan clutch always on

This... possibly. The viscous coupling in an engine driven fan typically fails in the locked up position. With the truck in park and warmed up, rev the engine and listen for a howling noise from the fan.

  • 1 year later...
melletj New Member

melletj

Posted
Posted

I have a 2004 Sierra 2500 HD with the 6.0L and I have replaced the viscous fan clutch, thermostat (with factory ~187F), and the coolant temperature sensor on the driver side cylinder head toward the front and everything stays the same on the gauge.  I have read the temp on my BlueDriver (highly recommend, by the way) and it reads about 195-198F.  I'm thinking this sounds about right, but wondering why the gauge in this truck doesn't run in the ~205F range like the others I have had.  It currently sits around the 180-185F mark.  I'm wondering if this could be related to the stepper motor in the instrument cluster because it sounds like GM has had a lot of issues with them.

 

Thanks,

Tom

txab Senior Enthusiast

txab

Posted
Posted

Could be stepper motor, but also could be that the motor has been replaced by this point in your truck's history. If so, it's probably they didn't get the needle set in the proper position after rebuild

melletj New Member

melletj

Posted
Posted

I thought about this.  When I got the truck at ~267,000 miles, most of the cluster lights and other switch lights in the truck were burnt out.  I did take the cluster and the HVAC controls (standard, not auto) out and replaced all of the bulbs.  I tried to put the needles back where they were, but you're right, I don't have any idea if someone else had been into mine.  It sounds like there are some that it changed without any work to the cluster, though.  I was thinking that I could just adjust the needle to make it go where I want it to!  I guess that may not be the most accurate, but I don't think the gauges are always that accurate anyway.

Sharpz Enthusiast

Sharpz

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, melletj said:

I thought about this.  When I got the truck at ~267,000 miles, most of the cluster lights and other switch lights in the truck were burnt out.  I did take the cluster and the HVAC controls (standard, not auto) out and replaced all of the bulbs.  I tried to put the needles back where they were, but you're right, I don't have any idea if someone else had been into mine.  It sounds like there are some that it changed without any work to the cluster, though.  I was thinking that I could just adjust the needle to make it go where I want it to!  I guess that may not be the most accurate, but I don't think the gauges are always that accurate anyway.

as others have said, dont go putting too much faith into that cluster gauge.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • asilverblazer
      The Peckish Synapse

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Mediocre, how much did they lose on the poorly conceived EV strategy?   I wonder how much the stock price is being 'inflated' by all the buy-backs?   Cadillac literally looks like a brand without a rudder, no clear goals or product direction - performance or luxury? I guess performance because we can throw a small block in whatever we can and call it a day. Certainly not luxury when a Denali or High Country is reasonably cross shoppable. The Celestiq - no way - no vehicle can command quarter million prices when something wearing the same badge is on the buy here pay here lot across town.   Notice the 'base' Escalade doesn't even come with the 'leather-appointed' seating surfaces.   Hummer EV - fail Silverado EV - fail Sierra EV - fail Bolt/Volt EV (The most successful EV cancelled, restarted, cancelled, whatever its current status it)   Hybrids - none Sedans - none Medium duty - not anymore Minivan - none Coupe - none Convertible - none CUVs - 20+/-   6.2 Recall that landed squarely on the GMs highest seller - and specifically the fattest margin higher trims of the Yukon, Escalade, et. al. The most critical product line they fumbled big time. In the Escalade segment, are those buyers forgiving GM for a bad engine and patiently waiting for the fixes and dealing with the headaches? Nope, they dump them and go straight to the other premium brands.   In the ENTIRE GM portfolio how many aspirational vehicles are there? Corvette, Escalade (quickly being superseded by the obvious better value Denali)...   I posted somewhere else... what if Cadillac left the luxury game and became a performance brand similar to AMG or (gasp) Ferrari? Cut all the entry-level and base models from their line up and focus on the V-series or Blackwing or whatever they call it now. Of course, those would have the pre-requisite luxury and technology as standard equipment. This opens the floor for Buick to step in/up as the luxury brand (like they are in China), no 'performance pretenses' get rid of the 'entry-level' models with equally 'entry-level' power trains and become the Maybach to Cadillacs AMG. With those two brands effectively out of the way Chevrolet, the 'entry-level' brand has the floor to itself and GMC can take over as 'professional grade'.    Now each brand has a focus, no in-fighting, clear direction, and customer targets.   Just need to sneakily slide Corvette into the Cadillac brand and dump the vestigial script writing.
    • Atlas
      The Peckish Synapse

      By Atlas · Posted

      I can't get enthusiastic about the 1.5T (or the 1.3 or the 1.2), I won't drive a CVT. But the stupid things sell in volume.
    • asilverblazer
      The Peckish Synapse

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      There is a big difference in motorcycles and vehicles - nobody needs a motorcycle, they WANT one. That WANT is the most powerful force to drive price upwards.   I've hated every iteration of the Equinox, a prime example of GM laziness. It excelled at absolutely nothing, barely competitive by every metric. At least the latest generation looks decent.    I want to like the Buick Envista, but that pitiful engine plus FWD only is a BIG NO for me, I don't care how good it looks.
    • Atlas
      The Peckish Synapse

      By Atlas · Posted

      For as much hate as Ms. Barra receives on here, she sure is a shrewd businesswoman....
    • bwiese
      auto mechanical driver's door unlock without pressing button? [2026 Silv. 1500 WT 4WD RC SB 2.7L]

      By bwiese · Posted

      Love my new 2026 truck - even as a basic WT it's comfy, rides nicely, etc.   Encouraged by the 100K powertrain warranty.   2nd GM I've ever owned (1st was a 2000SLE with Vortec V6 - loved that truck.) Small question - maybe I'm missing it in the manual? - but I seem to need to press the unlock button first, in order to open driver's door.  (Don't care as much about passenger door.) RKIs: is there any mod/setting change, etc such that when I merely pull the door handle it just unlocks + opens? I have minor concerns about ability to exit regardless of electrical performance. (I'm a bit limited agility w/osteoporosis from hyperparathyroidism - big guy, age 62, range of movement etc issues.) Thanks, Bill San Jose CA

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...