Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm not sure about those specific sizes but there's a comparison tool on rimsntires.com that makes it pretty easy to see the difference between wheel and tire sizes.

http://www.rimsntires.com/specspro.jsp

Appreciate the link. Some good info on it for sure. However I was looking more to see if anyone had already tried a 305 55 20 with the oem wheels and what the results were. I saw one with toyos but none with nitto.
Posted

Finally got my wheel/tire setup installed today!

Is your truck iridium metallic?

Posted

20x9 XD Hoss -12 offset. 285/50 terra grapplers. Wanting to do 305/50 or 305/55 next. Got a decent deal on this set used.

20150225_162627_zpsvcz3j05z.jpg

Love this color!!!
  • Like 1
Posted

Awesome that's the same thing as GMC's iridium metallic. I've been wondering what my truck would look like with athracite wheels. It looks awesome.

 

Anymore pics?

Posted

5RWill suggested I post my question in here, so copied it and posted it below.

 

Some folks have been talking about tires, and my question is; is there a way to tell the computer that the tire diameter has changed? I have suspected that folks experience mileage loss on a bigger tire may be due to not accounting for it in the speedo and therefore the trip calculator shows a drop. The reason I say this is that when a 31" tire travels 5280 feet (a mile), it gets there in 650 revolutions, but a 33" tire gets there in 611 revolutions (not accounting for slippage or bumps on the road).

 

So a truck with the smaller fires would still be traveling when the one with the big tires completed the mile (all things being equal).

 

Is my logic sound?

 

Of course, you can let the GPS tell you what speed you are traveling at and compare that to the speed-o-meter. If you are traveling faster than what the speedo shows, then you are also covering more ground. And that has to be accounted on the mileage calculation (and that goes even if you ignore the co puter and do the Ol trusty "fill-up-tank-then-travel-a-distance-and-then-fill-the-tank method). :)

 

GerryLP :cool:

Posted (edited)

Yes, you can update the computer settings to account for different size tires and thus a different count of rotations per mile. There are many programmers available to consumers that allow us to update the computer settings ourselves but the dealer can also update the settings for you. Buying a programmer will cost you $300 to $500 depending on which you get.

On the '14 and up, if you take the vehicle to a dealer for service, GM can see that you've updated the programming and could void all or part of your warranty depending on what settings you changed if they contributed to a failure of some kind. On the older vehicles, if you reset to factory settings before taking it to a dealer for service, they couldn't tell you'd done anything to it.

The local dealer to me it would be a bout $50 to $60 for the shop time to have them re-program my truck for a different tire size and any dealer would be far less likely to squawk about the warranty because it was just tire size and a dealer did the work.

I'd fight tooth and nail if they tried to void my warranty because I adjusted tire size settings myself but, at the same time, paying them $60 vs. spending $400 for a programming is fine by me. Once my warranty is up, I'll get a programmer and tune the motor, remove speed limiter, etc. but on a new model year vehicle and with some of the issues others have seen, I'll avoid risking warranty coverage!

 

As for mileage, a larger tire, and particularly a heavier 10 ply LT tire vs. the 4 ply P rated stock tires, means more rotating mass and therefor more power/fuel required to get move the vehicle. This is generally why there's a fuel economy loss when going with larger tires.

That being said, my '03 had 4.10 gearing and going with a 285/75R16 actually yielded better mileage than the stock 265/75R16 because my motor was at a lower RPM for the same speed and therefor using less fuel per mile.

 

5RWill suggested I post my question in here, so copied it and posted it below.

Some folks have been talking about tires, and my question is; is there a way to tell the computer that the tire diameter has changed? I have suspected that folks experience mileage loss on a bigger tire may be due to not accounting for it in the speedo and therefore the trip calculator shows a drop. The reason I say this is that when a 31" tire travels 5280 feet (a mile), it gets there in 650 revolutions, but a 33" tire gets there in 611 revolutions (not accounting for slippage or bumps on the road).

So a truck with the smaller fires would still be traveling when the one with the big tires completed the mile (all things being equal).

Is my logic sound?

Of course, you can let the GPS tell you what speed you are traveling at and compare that to the speed-o-meter. If you are traveling faster than what the speedo shows, then you are also covering more ground. And that has to be accounted on the mileage calculation (and that goes even if you ignore the co puter and do the Ol trusty "fill-up-tank-then-travel-a-distance-and-then-fill-the-tank method). :)

GerryLP :cool:

Edited by Hozer
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • "Increase"?   You want to "increase" your turning radius?     What is your truck?  What kind of cab and bed do you have currently?  Is it stock?  Modified?  Lifted?  
    • OP's quote is parts and labor.  Not just parts.     The # you found isn't the right one.  But besides that, the right # is the same price within a couple bucks.  $5802.01.    Now, factor in labor and fluids.  Book time is 17.1 hours for a Colorado 8 speed.  At $200/hr for a dealer average rate, its $3420 just in labor.  We are already at $9222.  Fluid and other necessary items, there's your $400-500 more.      Also.  Your "discounted" transmission.  Which is 99% likely quoted off of GM Parts Direct as that's the MSRP I found on their site.    You failed to note the $597 in shipping charges.  So we are right back almost to MSRP.  $5794.  Oh.  AND, you better have the $4000 for the core charge which you'd have to pay and get refunded, AND you gotta pay to SHIP THE CORE BACK.    So now you'd have paid MORE to buy that one online yourself, even after you get your core refunded.  
    • I would like to know if I can increase my 2025 Silverado 2500 HD
    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...