Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

$500 total for all 4 together??? New?

 

Jeez. That's crazy good if they're brand new.

 

Used but only for one summer, with centers and lugs too.

Posted

I HAVE A 2 INCH LEVEL WITH ZONE 1.5 BODY LIFT. CAN I FIT 275-60-20 TIRES ON THIS SET UP WTIHOUT ANY RUBBING?

  • Like 1
Posted

Any issues with height clearance into your standard garage with 2" level and 33" tires?

 

thx

Jim

Posted

attachicon.gifnick truck.JPG

any more pics of your truck Nick, that the same look I am going for.

Any issues fitting it into a standard height garage door?

  • Like 1
Posted

Any issues with height clearance into your standard garage with 2" level and 33" tires?

 

thx

Jim

I have been wondering the same since i have a tight garage. These trucks sit so low stock- I measured have have about 11" fron the top of the sirius antannae to the lowest point of the garage door. So I should definitely be fine clearance wise with a RC 2.5" level and 33's, in theory it should increase the overall heigh by about 5 or 6".

Posted

Truck looks great whats the offset on the wheels? Does it ride hard with that little sidewall?

Thanks,22x12 -44 offset. No it doesn't ride hard. It rides really nice on the fox shocks.

Posted

how do you figure Lawn-Boy shouldn't it be half of the tire diameter gain and the Level gain of 2.5 inches

 

 

I have been wondering the same since i have a tight garage. These trucks sit so low stock- I measured have have about 11" fron the top of the sirius antannae to the lowest point of the garage door. So I should definitely be fine clearance wise with a RC 2.5" level and 33's, in theory it should increase the overall heigh by about 5 or 6".

Posted

Xd buck 20x10 -24 offset with 37/12.5/r20

6 inch fabtech suspension

3 inch body

 

They did some minor trimming to plastic doesnt rub at all now

post-169254-0-37385000-1487024642_thumb.jpg

post-169254-0-53386200-1487024680_thumb.jpg

post-169254-0-37385000-1487024642_thumb.jpg

post-169254-0-53386200-1487024680_thumb.jpg

post-169254-0-37385000-1487024642_thumb.jpg

post-169254-0-53386200-1487024680_thumb.jpg

post-169254-0-37385000-1487024642_thumb.jpg

post-169254-0-53386200-1487024680_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

 

It doesn't look like there was much snow in those specific pictures, but from the bit of snow/wintry conditions that you have experienced, how did you feel about the tires in those conditions? I haven't gotten to play in snow yet with these tires, being from Oklahoma and such. I do make fairly frequent trips up to MN though. Wondering so I know how much prep (if any) I should expect to need for my trips with my tires.

I just got back from a weekend of sledding in the rockies, they were magnificent in the snow! and had to drive through a snowstorm on the way there, the tires were great, look great and arent loud, slight audible hum.

  • Like 2
Posted

Good deal! I've been eyeing that kit (or the Rough Country 3.5"), but if I go the full 3" I don't think I'll fit in my garage, haha. Good to know that kit still rides good at 3".

I went with the 3" because I still wanted to fit in garage, I have a 7' door and i still have about 2" to spare. thats also on 35's

Posted (edited)

how do you figure Lawn-Boy shouldn't it be half of the tire diameter gain and the Level gain of 2.5 inches

 

No idea...i just measured that my current tires are 29" tall, figured i'd add 4" for 33's and 2.5 for the level. am i wrong? Is my truck really gonna be a full foot taller with a level kit and 33s?

Edited by lawn boy
  • Like 1
Posted

You only gained half the diameter, so from The Hub to the ground it only increases half of overall tire size gain... my tires will be approximately two inches larger diameter so I will gain 1 inch there and 2 inches on the lift for a total gain of three inches in the front, its actually a level kit.

 

 

No idea...i just measured that my current tires are 29" tall, figured i'd add 4" for 33's and 2.5 for the level. am i wrong? Is my truck really gonna be a full foot taller with a level kit and 33s?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,724
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    No1UKnow
    Newest Member
    No1UKnow
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,225 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
    • 1/2 qt over full ain`t gonna hurt $h!t. Most times, a whole qt won`t either. Most have windage trays now. As long as the crank isn`t slapping itself in the oil, it`s not the end of the world.   We used to overfill 1 qt at the track, at race time. Better to have it over full than having the pan sucked dry at 6500 rpm`s.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...