Jump to content

I should have driven my 2500 Denali at night before purchasing


Recommended Posts

Posted

There are many things I love about my new 2015 GMC Denali 2500HD but the headlights are not one of them. I mistakenly thought that because my mid $60k truck was about the same price as my neighbors mid $60k Yukon, both being Denalis and his with HID projectors, that my truck would have the same lights. WRONG! I can't believe that vehicles driven on dirt roads in poorly lit areas get out of date technology when vehicles rarely driven outside well lit urban areas get them. There are so many other things given careful thought in this truck but the headlights and the ugly tow mirrors look like parts of the project that got behind schedule. The headlights in my $65,000 truck are awful and a safety issue in my opinion. So I guess my truck is sort of a Denali if you compare it to the Yukon and Yukon XL Denalis.

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I thought all 2500HD's had the projector headlights. Your's doesn't?

Trucks do not have HID's and projectors, the SUV's do. But all GMC trucks do have projectors. And drom what I have seen all Chevy HD's have projectors.

Posted

Trucks do not have HID's and projectors, the SUV's do. But all GMC trucks do have projectors. And drom what I have seen all Chevy HD's have projectors.

 

So the HD's have projectors, but not HID's? And the SUV's have both?

Posted

Only the top line SUV's as of now have both

Posted

Why did gm step back from the last model year ( 2013 ) of trucks and SUV which had HIDS and go with projectors on 14/15's?

The only GMT-900 vehicle that had HID's was the Escalade.

Posted

I thought all 2500HD's had the projector headlights. Your's doesn't?

Halogen projectors that are pathetic. I am going to replace the halogens with HIDs tomorrow.

Posted

Order some from DDM Tuning. You need a 9006. You most likey will not be able to use the Yukon setup. If you do figute figure it out, it will be a waste of a lot of time and money

Posted

There are many things I love about my new 2015 GMC Denali 2500HD but the headlights are not one of them. I mistakenly thought that because my mid $60k truck was about the same price as my neighbors mid $60k Yukon, both being Denalis and his with HID projectors, that my truck would have the same lights. WRONG! I can't believe that vehicles driven on dirt roads in poorly lit areas get out of date technology when vehicles rarely driven outside well lit urban areas get them. There are so many other things given careful thought in this truck but the headlights and the ugly tow mirrors look like parts of the project that got behind schedule. The headlights in my $65,000 truck are awful and a safety issue in my opinion. So I guess my truck is sort of a Denali if you compare it to the Yukon and Yukon XL Denalis.

 

First off GM doesn't know where your truck is going to live country, city etc. Cant believe people complain about headlights on newer vehicles, how in the hell did we drive back in the day of sealed beam headlights. Unreal.

 

My 15 2500HD has Halogen projectors and I can see into next year.

 

Safety issue, now that's funny

Posted

I got 35W HIDs installed leaving the projector lenses in place. Huge improvement so I am happy now.

Posted

I got 35W HIDs installed leaving the projector lenses in place. Huge improvement so I am happy now.

Where did you buy them and were they plug and play? did you have to modify anything?

Posted

I used an installer that was listed on the retrosource web site that is in DFW. They did a great job and used morimoto ballasts. It took them 2 hours but that include aligning the beams so I am legal. I don't know what was involved.

Posted

My headlights are good but not great. Before I go with the HID set up I am going to try some 5000k Xenon bulbs from Ebay for the low beams. They are fairly cheap. Had good luck with them in my Avalanche and GTO.

 

The factory headlights in the 15's are huge improvement over those in the older 800's.

 

Avalon

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Got to say I agree with the original post 100%. Picked up my new truck during the week. While the high beams are adequate, there is no doubt they are step down from my 2011 Silverado. Is a disappointment.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
    • // Thank you, also for your  response. More information is always good. This 2013 GMC is most likely my 'forever truck"-I'm 77 and retired...and truck only has 42K on it-very clean-so I try to keep it that way.  Tks again for your  response- glenn
    • I started my install this weekend. Everything was pretty straight forward but I ran into one issue with running power through the firewall. The nipple grommet on my High Country already has a small harness running through it - has anyone else ran into this issue? And on the engine bay side, does the wire basically just penetrate the factory wiring boot? I did this on my '22 Trail Boss and it seems much easier but thats been a few years. My other thought would be possibly drilling a new hole adding a rubber grommet just to the lower left of the factory hole. Thoughts?   Has anyone used a T-harness off the Bose amp and obtained power from there? It seems a little odd that such a small amp needs 3 power leads
    • ///// Ok--Thanks for that info--I could not find yesterday when I looked for the specs on that NAPA filter what I wanted. Their website is not very user friendly. I buy all teh filters for  our three vehicles once or twice a year. Have always run NAPA Gold on everything I own....I buy it thru my Son's account for his business-which he has a Heavy Equipment repair shop-one reason he uses NAPA so much-they have such a full line of coverage for just about anything/anywhere- He gets s  good discount because of volume bought. Anyway-Thank you -Sir for your response.   glenn
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...