Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For those of you that switched to the BFGs and had vibrations with the Goodyear SRAs, did the BFG correct the vibration at all?

 

Can you comment on the ride quality of the BFGs vs the SRAs?

 

I'm also considering the Michelins Premier LTX.

 

I can't remember what was the largest size I could go up to with only a 1.5” front level. Was it 275-60-20? Basically 33s.

 

I've had it with the last remaining vibration in the SRAs and the obnoxious road noise/whining.

Posted

For those of you that switched to the BFGs and had vibrations with the Goodyear SRAs, did the BFG correct the vibration at all?

 

Can you comment on the ride quality of the BFGs vs the SRAs?

 

I'm also considering the Michelins Premier LTX.

 

I can't remember what was the largest size I could go up to with only a 1.5” front level. Was it 275-60-20? Basically 33s.

 

I've had it with the last remaining vibration in the SRAs and the obnoxious road noise/whining.

When I first put my K02s on, the worst tire had a 18 rf. The buffeting returned, albeit slightly. I took them back to my tire dealer who said that 25lbs was the rule of thumb for LT tires, but agreed to look after me. When he was done, 2 were replaced and the worst tire was 12lbs and the best 6lbs. My truck is nice and quiet.

 

For summer duty, I'll be replacing the stock Continental with "MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S" since I have my K02s for the snow.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hey all, thought I would share my '16 Z71 with RC 2.5" level and 285/65R18 KO2's

 

Loving it, cannot wait for snow

 

1d13966e40.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
post-147361-0-41947000-1463291345_thumb.jpeg
post-147361-0-00780200-1463291335_thumb.jpeg
New KO2 in my 14' Silverado. 2 3/4" level kit and 1" higher in rear with blocks. Love the look and drive. Cant wait for some snow to test them out. In mud there not great but what tire is when its mud packed. 275/60/20

 

post-147361-0-00780200-1463291335_thumb.jpeg

post-147361-0-41947000-1463291345_thumb.jpeg

post-147361-0-00780200-1463291335_thumb.jpeg

post-147361-0-41947000-1463291345_thumb.jpeg

post-147361-0-00780200-1463291335_thumb.jpeg

post-147361-0-41947000-1463291345_thumb.jpeg

Edited by Syclone3MT
Posted

Hey all, thought I would share my '16 Z71 with RC 2.5" level and 285/65R18 KO2's

 

Loving it, cannot wait for snow

 

1d13966e40.jpg

 

Looks like you have KO2s in the front and KOs in the back?

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Looks like you have KO2s in the front and KOs in the back?

I had to go out and double check my tires. They are all KO2, maybe the angle or something threw that pic off. But all good!

  • Like 1
Posted

I had to go out and double check my tires. They are all KO2, maybe the angle or something threw that pic off. But all good!

 

What's your lock to lock clearances between your swaybar and UCA and the tires? Do you think you could have gone one size bigger (305)? That's the big debate....285s or 305s on stock 18s. Could you put a tape on the tires to get a true tread and section width for me?

 

I think it looks great. How do you like the ride?

 

 

I have a 2.25" Pro Comp Leveling kit and 305/55/20 KO's. Smooth!!! No Rubbing. The KO's seem to be a bit narrower that other 305's. Love the look

 

Looks great. I have those same style rims in 18 on my Sierra. How wide are those 305s by a tape measure?

Posted

 

What's your lock to lock clearances between your swaybar and UCA and the tires? Do you think you could have gone one size bigger (305)? That's the big debate....285s or 305s on stock 18s. Could you put a tape on the tires to get a true tread and section width for me?

 

I think it looks great. How do you like the ride?

 

I can get a measurement on the weekend for ya if you like. I played it safe and went with the 285's just in case.

 

I am very pleased with the ride comfort. Seeing I installed the RC 2.5" level at the same time. They are quiet, but its s stiffer ride now for sure.

Posted

 

What's your lock to lock clearances between your swaybar and UCA and the tires? Do you think you could have gone one size bigger (305)? That's the big debate....285s or 305s on stock 18s. Could you put a tape on the tires to get a true tread and section width for me?

 

I think it looks great. How do you like the ride?

 

 

 

Looks great. I have those same style rims in 18 on my Sierra. How wide are those 305s by a tape measure?

I'd be interested to see if some 305/65/18s fit on stock wheels or maybe even +18 offset. If they do I might stay with 18's and not move to 17's like I planned.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

Well I finally pulled the trigger and ended up getting the BFG KO2 for the GMT-900 2012 GMC Sierra. I opted for the 285/70R17 since I have the 2" lift up front. ended up getting them for $229 with a $50 rebate best price I could find. I opted to start at 45PSI up front and 42PSI in the rear. I noticed after going from my SUV Bridgestone Dueler tires that at 40PSI these seemed to be a little sluggish in response at that pressure.

 

Anyway here are the pictures.

post-103053-0-41538400-1482963793_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-78564200-1482963801_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-18849600-1482963853_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-71579700-1482963859_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-09732400-1482963900_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-59120900-1482963906_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-41538400-1482963793_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-78564200-1482963801_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-18849600-1482963853_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-71579700-1482963859_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-09732400-1482963900_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-59120900-1482963906_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-41538400-1482963793_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-78564200-1482963801_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-18849600-1482963853_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-71579700-1482963859_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-09732400-1482963900_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-59120900-1482963906_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-41538400-1482963793_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-78564200-1482963801_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-18849600-1482963853_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-71579700-1482963859_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-09732400-1482963900_thumb.jpg

post-103053-0-59120900-1482963906_thumb.jpg

Edited by scott26
Posted

15776624_10210408322998411_8908518856665

 

DaQowNZ.jpg

 

399YKxr.jpg

 

 

285/65r20. 2" RC level up front. 2" firestone airbag lift in rear.

Man I wish they made this equivalent size in an 18". That looks awesome!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Man I wish they made this equivalent size in an 18". That looks awesome!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

they do. and i have them...and theyre for sale and in like new condition!

285/65/18

10zspyp.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...