Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Still love mine...and again I talked to Bilstein and they said they didn't reccomend the 5100s on the factory ride settings (bottomed out) that's why they make the 4600. The truck now feels really close to the way my Avalanche and my wife's Tahoe ride, I'm sure the Ranchos ride well too.

  • Like 1
Posted

Part number for the quick lift you want is RS999901

 

Yes.. you can adjust the firmness of the struts.... but not the height.

  • Like 1
Posted

Everyone will have their own preference but I went from Ranchos, (AT package) to stock oem non AT then to Bilsteins w/ max height in front and it's not even close IMO that the Bilsteins are far superior. Not "bouncy" over bumps but not stiff either.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Yeah, thats the exact thing that drove me nuts with mine as well. I have the Max Tow and it felt like the back was really stiff but the front would float alot, the bilsteins fixed that. I think it rides alot better, they should have put these shocks on from the factory in my opinion. Let me know how your aligment looks, I am still debating on doing it just for peace of mind.

Had my truck aligned today. They said it wasn't out enough for me to notice, but it was out a little and would have affected tire wear some so I'm glad I had it checked. It was worth the 50 bucks I think!
  • Like 1
Posted

Just finished my install of a set of 5100s. I set the front shocks at their upper most position and installed a 1/4" spacer under the bottom of the front shocks. I ended up with 2" of lift at the center line of the front wheels and the ride is just as comfortable as it was stock. The truck seems to handle a bit better in the curves and that 57 Buick Special feeling is gone. I had already installed an extra 1" of lift on the rear necessitated when I installed some Firestone air bags for towing my car trailer. Now the top of front fender well is 39" off the ground and the top of the rear fender well is 40". Totally happy with the truck's stance and ride.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just finished my install of a set of 5100s. I set the front shocks at their upper most position and installed a 1/4" spacer under the bottom of the front shocks. I ended up with 2" of lift at the center line of the front wheels and the ride is just as comfortable as it was stock. The truck seems to handle a bit better in the curves and that 57 Buick Special feeling is gone. I had already installed an extra 1" of lift on the rear necessitated when I installed some Firestone air bags for towing my car trailer. Now the top of front fender well is 39" off the ground and the top of the rear fender well is 40". Totally happy with the truck's stance and ride.

I noticed that my truck handled better as well. I think it just tightened up the ride which I like. Agree completely on the 57 Buick comment!

  • Like 2
Posted

Here is the before and after on the Bilstein install. After picture includes 275/70/18 Hankook Dynapro atm. The truck rides great and is almost perfectly level. I think I have about .25" in rake. I may install a rear block later if the rear drops too much with a small load or towing a boat.

post-139593-0-38799300-1424321430_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-87275100-1424321445_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-38799300-1424321430_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-87275100-1424321445_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-38799300-1424321430_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-87275100-1424321445_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-38799300-1424321430_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-87275100-1424321445_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Here is the before and after on the Bilstein install. After picture includes 275/70/18 Hankook Dynapro atm. The truck rides great and is almost perfectly level. I think I have about .25" in rake. I may install a rear block later if the rear drops too much with a small load or towing a boat.

 

You go with the max setting?

Posted (edited)

Here is the before and after on the Bilstein install. After picture includes 275/70/18 Hankook Dynapro atm. The truck rides great and is almost perfectly level. I think I have about .25" in rake. I may install a rear block later if the rear drops too much with a small load or towing a boat.

It's funny that you posted this last night, I just got the same tires yesterday! Pics to follow

Edited by mtbsam
Posted

Esexton, your truck looks great, a .75 inch block in the rear would be plenty and you wouldnt have to go with a longer rear shock, I may do that. The handling and ride quality is much improved compared to the stock shocks. This is one of the best upgrades a person can do to a basic truck, if you have factory Ranchos I cant see it being worth the almost $450 total for shocks and labor. In my case the factory Black Shocks Sucked at under 14000 miles, and needed upgraded, West Virginia roads are rough and right now snow covered and getting worse daily. Next to buy some tires like esexton's :)

Posted (edited)

Don't think for 1min. that those Rancho shocks that come on the truck are any better then the junk OEM shocks! Both suck!

Edited by SMiller
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Here is my truck before and after the upgrades. Unfortunately it's filthy and the photos weren't taken in the same setting for comparison. I think the difference is obvious!

 

post-39512-142438343775_thumb.jpeg

f15f0eeca755ed0e3ca1662a4a17f00d.jpg

post-39512-142438344128_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344708_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438343775_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344128_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344708_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438343775_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344128_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344708_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438343775_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344128_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344708_thumb.jpeg

Edited by mtbsam
  • Like 1
Posted

Don't think for 1min. that those Rancho shocks that come on the truck are any better then the just OEM shocks! Both suck!

 

+1 on that...I really am not happy with my Rancho's. Can't wait to get these on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...