Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It looks like the Bilstein 5100s will be about $650 installed here... Tell me it's worth the upgrade over the Rancho shocks that came stock on my 2015 GMC Sierra with Z71 package.

 

 

This will help ride quality from being so harsh and bouncy, right?

 

I am new at this.. This is my first pickup.. I am coming from an Avalanche.

Posted

It looks like the Bilstein 5100s will be about $650 installed here... Tell me it's worth the upgrade over the Rancho shocks that came stock on my 2015 GMC Sierra with Z71 package.

 

 

This will help ride quality from being so harsh and bouncy, right?

 

I am new at this.. This is my first pickup.. I am coming from an Avalanche.

 

I found them for about 340 for parts front and rear from 4wheel parts. Can you not install yourself?

 

Im going with the 2inch front level from motofab for now, costs me next to nothing and waiting to see about these 6112's. So I cant say if another 300 for install is worth it.

Posted

Yea I can't install them myself, unfortunately.

 

Somebody who has gone from the stock Rancho shocks to the 5100s for general drive ability and comfort... This is worth the upgrade?

Posted

$650 installed is very high for 2 hours of work. I would order them myself then take them to a shop to install. Install should be around $100, then another $50 for front alignment.

 

All you really need to install these is a table mounted vice and rented strut compressors.

 

I just switched for the Rancho's to 5100's on the 2nd (+0.75" lift) setting, and it's a huge difference. No more bouncing making a low-speed turn, and the truck feels much more stable on the highway. I've run 5100's on my past three vehicles, and they're always worth the price. I install everything myself though.

  • Like 1
Posted

This is a great visual of the snap ring settings...

 

http://s784.photobucket.com/user/ajantics/media/Chevy%20Silverado/Screenshot%202015-12-17%2009.30.12.png.html

 

 

I started off with the snap ring at the highest setting / 1.85" of lift and a .5" bottom block, it was way to stiff and the drive was unbearable.

 

I then had a shop move them down to the 3 snap ring position / 1.26" of lift, and have been driving on that for 5 months. The ride is better but the front is still significantly stiffer than the rear thus the truck feels out of balance and tends to dolphin / porpoise on the freeway over bumps. I have been countering this by running my rear air shocks at 15psi but I have had enough and will be taking it into a shop on Monday to have it moved to the 2nd position or .75", which should balance out the ride. I am only paying $160 to have this done so shop around before you pay $650. Find a locally owned shop to do the install, then take it to a chain to have the alignment done.

 

I hate being the guy that has tried/paid for each setting but that apears to be how it worked out.

Posted

This is a great visual of the snap ring settings...

 

http://s784.photobucket.com/user/ajantics/media/Chevy%20Silverado/Screenshot%202015-12-17%2009.30.12.png.html

 

 

I started off with the snap ring at the highest setting / 1.85" of lift and a .5" bottom block, it was way to stiff and the drive was unbearable.

 

I then had a shop move them down to the 3 snap ring position / 1.26" of lift, and have been driving on that for 5 months. The ride is better but the front is still significantly stiffer than the rear thus the truck feels out of balance and tends to dolphin / porpoise on the freeway over bumps. I have been countering this by running my rear air shocks at 15psi but I have had enough and will be taking it into a shop on Monday to have it moved to the 2nd position or .75", which should balance out the ride. I am only paying $160 to have this done so shop around before you pay $650. Find a locally owned shop to do the install, then take it to a chain to have the alignment done.

 

I hate being the guy that has tried/paid for each setting but that apears to be how it worked out.

Try ditching the bottom block!

 

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Hit send instead of enter....

 

5100s are not designed to be used with any lift blocks. If you keep lowering the ring, just ditch the block and use them as designed. Worth a try

 

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

Posted

Yeah that should have been the first try to remove block. Much easier then disassembling and lowering snap ring.

Posted

How would dropping the bottom block out have any impact on the preload of the spring given that the preload aIs a result of the distance between the shock perch and the top of the strut.

 

The only impact of having the bottom block on the shock has an additional half inch of lift.

Posted (edited)

Your altering geometry and adding preload. 5100s weren't designed to have a block with them. From what I've read, the people that post with the most ride issues tried to run a block or something with the Bilstein. Bilstein has a whole article/video on why spacers top and bottom are inferior to a leveling shock. If I can find it I'll add it here.

 

Just don't get why people try to do both. Your combining parts never meant to be used together and blame parts for less than ideal results.

Edited by jrob56
  • Like 2
Posted

How would dropping the bottom block out have any impact on the preload of the spring given that the preload aIs a result of the distance between the shock perch and the top of the strut.

 

The only impact of having the bottom block on the shock has an additional half inch of lift.

Get rid of the bottom block and it won't be so harsh. I have mine at the top setting. Yes it's stiff but it rides like a truck should nothing out of the ordinary. Try taking them off before you drop more cash on paying a shop to mess with the settings on the bilsteins. If it's not good. Then when you have the shop adjust the bilsteins....have them out the block back in. Process of elimination. ...you've adjusted the bilsteins once, still not what you want, try something else.. Good luck. PS. The bilsteins were the best investment could have done on my truck. People constantly comment on how nice it rides.

Posted

The only impact of having the bottom block on the shock has an additional half inch of lift.

The 5100's are longer than stock shocks, so any spacer added makes them an even longer assembly, which can over-extend the uca ball joint and cv joints. If you have the aluminum suspension, you'd be lucky to get a 1/2" spacer in without the uca contacting the bump-stop.

 

It was my original plan to run 5100's on the 2nd setting with a 1" bottom spacer, but after I saw how much longer the 5100's were, I knew it wouldn't work without contact.

  • Like 1
Posted

Official Update on the 6112:

 

6112's are coming slowly but surely. 1st gen Tundra and 3rd gen 4Runner were released to the plant some time ago. I am hoping mid summer for market release.

As for the domestics (Ram 1500,F150, GM1500), these are almost finished for development... getting really close, but once they are released it's going to be another 6 months for production. I have actually ordered the Ram but I have been told the 14- F150 and the 07- GM are close behind for placing our first production order.

 

 

Looking like an October release for the GM trucks 6112.

Posted

Official Update on the 6112:

 

 

 

 

Looking like an October release for the GM trucks 6112.

The way this process has been going it will be April of 17 next. :tumbleweed:

  • Like 2
Posted

Official Update on the 6112:

 

 

 

 

Looking like an October release for the GM trucks 6112.

Thanks for the update. I went with a motofab 2 inch block in the meantime. Let us know if you find out more.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,739
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    JimmyB4
    Newest Member
    JimmyB4
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 644 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Are you going to take long trips in it?  If so, try out the seats in the various trims. For me the lower trim level seats were not comfortable. 
    • I have a 2016 that I bought new and still own. I'm around 129,000 miles now. The biggest problem was a transmission failure about 2 years ago around 95000 miles. No warning, just failed while driving down a back road. A reman GM transmission installed and it's been fine ever since. A few other minor problems along the way. I am in no hurry to replace it. It's been paid off long ago and do plan on driving this as long as I can.   I will admit I am leery about all the additional electronics in the newer models and feel that it is just more potential problems. I think there's actually more than I would have wanted in this 2016 but so far so good. I think even if something major like lifter failure happened, it would still be cheaper to at worst, drop a new engine in than buy a new vehicle. 
    • I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...