Jump to content

Bilstein shocks thread

yanzhixiang

By yanzhixiang
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

NEMESIS-A/T Enthusiast

NEMESIS-A/T

Posted
Posted

Any real world measurements on what the .85 setting gave you or what the 1.25 setting gave?

Im assuming the .85 setting yields .50" and the "1.25 setting yields "1.

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

bwilloby46
bwilloby46

I put the bilstein 5100s on the rear of my 14 High Country with a new 2" block a few weeks ago. Ride is unbelievable compared to stock. Liked it so much I got the adjustable 5100s for my front, remove

schloppy
schloppy

Hello, I'm not new to the forum but I just joined and figured I'd contribute to the community.   2016 Silverado 1500 "Z71" removed rancho's and swapped with Bilstein 5100's all around. So after d

Jullian is not my name
Jullian is not my name

I just got done with installing my 6112's on my 2014 GMC Sierra Crew Cab.  Reading some install guides on here really helped, along with printing some Chilton Repair guide torque specs that I got from

Posted Images

bwilloby46 Enthusiast

bwilloby46

Posted
Posted

Any real world measurements on what the .85 setting gave you or what the 1.25 setting gave?

Im assuming the .85 setting yields .50" and the "1.25 setting yields "1.

I went straight for the top setting at 1.85". Since it requires a spring compressor and top hat removal to adjust, I have not used any of the other settings. I got just over 2" with it which is what I wanted.

MRTMotorsports Enthusiast

MRTMotorsports

Posted
Posted

Anyone? Or any shops they'd recommend that may know?

 

MRT Motorsports is the only shop you need! We have been on this thread since the start and are here to help.

 

I got your PM. For rear shock options Belltech makes two versions of shocks in two lowering range sizes that are specifically designed for a 14+ chevy lowered 2-4 or 5-7" in the rear.

 

Realizing that the 5100 for your application is slightly longer than the OE stock with these specs,

Collapsed Length (IN): 16.18

Extended Length (IN): 25.79

 

You will need a shock around 14" collapsed and a minimum of 24.5". There is a Bilstein HD 24-021715 that measures at

Collapsed Length: 14.33

Extended Length: 22.72

This will limit a bit of down travel, but usually when lowered you arent fully flexing the suspension. The collapsed number is going to be more important. This shock was designed for older chevys lowered up to 6", but has the same eyelets so it will bolt up and the valving should be good.

 

 

MRTMotorsports Enthusiast

MRTMotorsports

Posted
Posted

Yea. These forums help, but then they are also filled with a bunch of nonsense. No way to tell. I have those shocks and know how great the ride is, so either way boot up or down I'm sure they are just fine. just thought I'd give my two cents hoping it would help out a fellow Chevy owner. You got a very nice truck! Hope you enjoy yours as much as I enjoy mine!

 

 

We hear you on that. Lots of misinformation posted in this thread as well as most others. We try to clear up any questions you all may have, being a business we cant really post non fact checked or wrong information or people wouldnt trust shopping with us.

 

 

The fact of the matter is the shock is a mono-tube gas pressurized shock and it doesn't matter how you mount it, they work rightside up, upside down, sideways, backwards.

 

Having said that, try to get the logos and text right side up :)

 

42179d1384266953-bilstein-5100-series-st

Rawyzf Senior Enthusiast

Rawyzf

Posted
Posted

So, with a 2" RC Level, the 4600 is the correct choice up front, right?

 

The 5100, being adjustable, will not fit correctly if you have a spacer level.

jrob56 Enthusiast

jrob56

Posted
Posted

So, with a 2" RC Level, the 4600 is the correct choice up front, right?

 

The 5100, being adjustable, will not fit correctly if you have a spacer level.

 

Id buy the 5100 and just pull the spacer. I put a spacer in right now while waiting to see how the 6112's pan out. Either way spacer will come out and bilstein 5100 or new 6112 will go in.

  • Like 1
Rawyzf Senior Enthusiast

Rawyzf

Posted
Posted

 

Id buy the 5100 and just pull the spacer. I put a spacer in right now while waiting to see how the 6112's pan out. Either way spacer will come out and bilstein 5100 or new 6112 will go in.

 

I'm really happy with the way the truck sits leveled right now with the 2" RC Level. I don't want to mess with the adjustable heights of the 5100. I'd probably choose the middle setting and end up wanting high, or vice versa.

 

I just want a better shock up front and rear, as the ranchos are bouncy in the rear. I figured, I might as well do all 4 at the same time.

 

I think the 4600 is the right choice, and can handle going in with a 2" level, but wanted to confirm or see who else has done it.

  • Like 2
MRTMotorsports Enthusiast

MRTMotorsports

Posted
Posted

So, with a 2" RC Level, the 4600 is the correct choice up front, right?

 

The 5100, being adjustable, will not fit correctly if you have a spacer level.

 

If you must use the spacer, go with the 4600. It is the same length as stock, vs the slightly longer 5100.

  • Like 1
MRTMotorsports Enthusiast

MRTMotorsports

Posted
Posted

I should have my vendor account setup today so I can offer you guys great deals on all brands of shocks including Bilstein. Ive been in business for almost ten years and have a great relationship with Bilstein. This is why we will be offering you all the first dibs on the 6112.

  • Like 1
jrob56 Enthusiast

jrob56

Posted
Posted

I should have my vendor account setup today so I can offer you guys great deals on all brands of shocks including Bilstein. Ive been in business for almost ten years and have a great relationship with Bilstein. This is why we will be offering you all the first dibs on the 6112.

 

I was always curious about your status as a vendor. Good to hear!

  • Like 1
MRTMotorsports Enthusiast

MRTMotorsports

Posted
Posted

Check it, shiny new vendor tag! Im here to help you guys. My shop is in Las Vegas and I have been building trucks for 15+ years now. If I can be of any assistance or if I can quote you on some upgrades for your truck please shoot me a PM or email.

  • Like 2
Rawyzf Senior Enthusiast

Rawyzf

Posted
Posted

Check it, shiny new vendor tag! Im here to help you guys. My shop is in Las Vegas and I have been building trucks for 15+ years now. If I can be of any assistance or if I can quote you on some upgrades for your truck please shoot me a PM or email.

 

Congrats and PM sent! :)

  • Like 1
jrob56 Enthusiast

jrob56

Posted
Posted

Check it, shiny new vendor tag! Im here to help you guys. My shop is in Las Vegas and I have been building trucks for 15+ years now. If I can be of any assistance or if I can quote you on some upgrades for your truck please shoot me a PM or email.

 

Since it would be relevant to this thread, how much would the 5100 series shock set be for 2014 Silverado LTZ 5.3?

  • Like 1
Rawyzf Senior Enthusiast

Rawyzf

Posted
Posted

Toyota 6112 vs beer bottle

 

msg-151356-0-25806000-1461789251_thumb.j

 

I've seen Rad a billion times, but not since the early 90s.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Atlas · Posted

      On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • chris21
      Brand new to this forum. Questions about re-gearing my 26’ HD

      By chris21 · Posted

      I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • BDS my HD
      Brand new to this forum. Questions about re-gearing my 26’ HD

      By BDS my HD · Posted

      Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • newdude
      Brand new to this forum. Questions about re-gearing my 26’ HD

      By newdude · Posted

      That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...