Jump to content

4.8 to 5.3 swap, anyone done this?

BLACK DEATH
 Share

Recommended Posts

BLACK DEATH Enthusiast

BLACK DEATH

Posted
Posted

Thinking of swapping engines out on my 01 truck.

Engine is an 04 5.3 so no issues with anything long block wise.

I know the PCM would need a 5.3 tune for the swap also.

I know going to a 6.0 would be great but the 6.0 I have is going into my 69 Camaro.

 

So has anyone swapped from a 4.8 to a 5.3? Was it worth it?

phwe9774 Enthusiast

phwe9774

Posted
Posted

I have an 04 with the 5.3 and my buddy has an 03 with the 4.8. I don't know what you want to accomplish with the 5.3, but there isn't enough of a power or torque difference to justify the swap for me. I want to say there's only a couple hundred lbs difference in the torque rating between the two. Plus the 4.8 gets a couple extra MPG for nearly the same performance. Only difference I've noticed is on dirt or gravel or towing on extremely steep hills. But again, it's not enough of a difference to convince me to do it

Chris Senior Enthusiast

Chris

Posted
Posted

The difference is he has the engine and i am guessing the 4.8 is getting worn out. And yes it will work. Swap out the long block. You reuse your intake manifold, throttle body, and fuel setup. Then retune

  • Like 1
PJB1972 Enthusiast

PJB1972

Posted
Posted

So has anyone swapped from a 4.8 to a 5.3? Was it worth it?

I had a 4.8 that was leaking coolant into the oil... I was short on cash at the time and couldn't upgrade the trans too so I swapped in a junkyard 5.3.

Used the intake and everything that came on the 5.3... Didn't even change the tune.

Fired up on the first try and has been running for 3 years.

Power difference is SLIGHTLY noticeable, would likely be better with a tune... But now I have the 6.0L itch... So...

PJB1972 Enthusiast

PJB1972

Posted
Posted (edited)

I want to say there's only a couple hundred lbs difference in the torque rating between the two.

Hell, that's worth a swap in my opinion!

lol

 

For the record, depending on the year/version it's about 40 lb-ft

Edited by PJB1972
phwe9774 Enthusiast

phwe9774

Posted
Posted

Thanks for that. Thinking about it now, I'd swap them out for a couple hundred lbs haha wasn't thinking for a minute. 20-40 lbs is what I was thinking.

 

Point being, not worth a swap for me unless you have major problems with the 4.8

  • Like 1
PJB1972 Enthusiast

PJB1972

Posted
Posted (edited)

Point being, not worth a swap for me unless you have major problems with the 4.8

Certainly not worth the money/time/effort unless you've got to replace it for another reason in the first place.

Edited by PJB1972
BLACK DEATH Enthusiast

BLACK DEATH

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Good points....

So the current 4.8 in the truck doesn't have any issues I can see or tell.

Runs good, starts good and has good over all power it seems.

Has 176k miles but doesn't feel like it does.

I do have an 04 5.3 complete swap with everything. We were going to swap it into another vehicle.

It was just a thought. Either sell it or swap it into the truck. It had under 100k when pulled.

Well now idk what to do, let it sit for a rainy day or sell it.

Stevens03 Senior Enthusiast

Stevens03

Posted
Posted

The big difference between the 2 is the torque. Not so much in HP. Also does the 2004 motor come with drive by wire? Make sure it doesnt. Should be an easy swap

Chris Senior Enthusiast

Chris

Posted
Posted

The big difference between the 2 is the torque. Not so much in HP. Also does the 2004 motor come with drive by wire? Make sure it doesnt. Should be an easy swap

It is drive by wire and returnless fuel system. Thats why he would swap his current manifold, TB, and rails to the 5.3 if he does it
  • Like 2
BLACK DEATH Enthusiast

BLACK DEATH

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes it is dbw, but I'd only use the long block setup for the swap.

I Dont think 4.8 sell for anything at all, even if its a complete swap.

We can all use more torque in a truck.

I paid $550 for this complete swap, just missing the starter only.

Chris Senior Enthusiast

Chris

Posted
Posted

Yes it is dbw, but I'd only use the long block setup for the swap.

I Dont think 4.8 sell for anything at all, even if its a complete swap.

We can all use more torque in a truck.

I paid $550 for this complete swap, just missing the starter only.

Your current starter will fit on it
DwayneJ Enthusiast

DwayneJ

Posted
Posted

You could always do a few simple lods to the 5.3l before swapping it in and then combined with a tune it would make a large difference.

 

The 4.8l are popular with guys wanting turbo setups in smaller cars, the 4.8l limits lowend torque so they can launch and the turbo makes the HP later. Heck the 4.8l pistons are a popular upgrade in 5.3l motors to raise compression because they are flat top.

  • Like 1
PJB1972 Enthusiast

PJB1972

Posted
Posted

I paid $550 for this complete swap.

You could definitely get a few hundred out of the 4.8 if there's nothing wrong with it. Record a video of it before you pull it.

I like the idea of throwing a few mods at it while it's pulled, that and a tune will be quite noticable!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • tjonesdfw
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By tjonesdfw · Posted

      Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • Atlas
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Atlas · Posted

      No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • GMCustomerService
      Electrical problem

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • newdude
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By newdude · Posted

      - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...