Jump to content

Leveling kit advice please


Recommended Posts

Posted

Bilsteins are on national back order right now. If you really want to upgrade shocks, go fox shocks.

Agreed!!!!! Never was impressed with Bilstein

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Agreed!!!!! Never was impressed with Bilstein

Yup! better than stock, stiffer than stock, more controlled than stock, but by no means are they amazing. Same with rancho quicklifts. You get what you pay for. When you can buy 5100's for cheaper than the dealer sells the stock shocks for it really goes to show you what you're getting.

 

 

The best setup will be a coil over setup. I think so many people want 5100's cause it sounds cool.gif and expensive to have "Bilstein" shocks.

Posted

http://www.socalsupertrucks.com/fox-2-0-performance-series-coil-over-ifp-shock-chevy-gmc.aspx#.VbFNcp_D_qD

 

What I will be going with here shortly. Coil over on the fronts

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

I'm torn between something like that or the new 6112's. I really want whatevers going to ride nice and soft. The trd pro tacomas have a setup similar to 6112's and they're pretty bad ass. How many stock trucks are jumpable?

 

 

Posted

I'm torn between something like that or the new 6112's. I really want whatevers going to ride nice and soft. The trd pro tacomas have a setup similar to 6112's and they're pretty bad ass.

 

 

But no release for our trucks until late this year or early next year

Posted

http://www.socalsupertrucks.com/fox-2-0-performance-series-coil-over-ifp-shock-chevy-gmc.aspx#.VbFNcp_D_qD

 

What I will be going with here shortly. Coil over on the fronts

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Forgive my ignorance, but these will be much better than the bilsteins correct? How will it affect ride quality for someone like me who is on pavement 95% of the time? The part says its for the aluminum control arms; how am I to determine if mine has the steel or the aluminum? Do they come preloaded for 2" of lift?

 

Thanks for your help

Josh

Posted

Forgive my ignorance, but these will be much better than the bilsteins correct? How will it affect ride quality for someone like me who is on pavement 95% of the time? The part says its for the aluminum control arms; how am I to determine if mine has the steel or the aluminum? Do they come preloaded for 2" of lift?

 

Thanks for your help

Josh

Better than Bilstein 5100's..... Yes

Better than Bilstein 6112..... Debatable

I say coil over shocks are the way to go vs bilstein 5100 adjustable shocks.

 

Coil over shocks will absorb any bump better than just a piston style shock. Coil overs have piston and springs.

 

If you haven't lifted or leveled your truck, you wouldn't understand the difference in ride. Where the difference is very little, the stock shocks are junk.

 

Also, having shocks that lift your truck will keep a better angle on ball joints vs a level kit. Preventing premature wear on parts. ( debatable)

 

And if you have a aluminum control arm they will be silver, steel ones are black

Posted

Better than Bilstein 5100's..... Yes

Better than Bilstein 6112..... Debatable

I say coil over shocks are the way to go vs bilstein 5100 adjustable shocks.

 

Coil over shocks will absorb any bump better than just a piston style shock. Coil overs have piston and springs.

 

If you haven't lifted or leveled your truck, you wouldn't understand the difference in ride. Where the difference is very little, the stock shocks are junk.

 

Also, having shocks that lift your truck will keep a better angle on ball joints vs a level kit. Preventing premature wear on parts. ( debatable)

 

And if you have a aluminum control arm they will be silver, steel ones are black

 

Thank you very much.

 

I have leveled 2 of my previous trucks (2" RC on a 2008 silverado, and Bilsteins on a 2014 Ram) but so far haven't touched this one. I agree that the stock Ranchos aren't great. I was just worried that I'd be "overdoing" it by going to an expensive Fox Coil Over considering I almost never leave the pavement.

 

I'm very grateful for everyone that has chimed in on this thread and offered advice to me; it's truly been helpful. I have decided that I'll go with those Fox Coil Overs for the front to increase the height by 2", and some Fox's in the rear as well.

 

Thanks again everyone

Josh

Posted

http://www.socalsupertrucks.com/fox-2-0-performance-series-coil-over-ifp-shock-chevy-gmc.aspx#.VbGMzp_D_qD

 

Front shocks

 

http://www.socalsupertrucks.com/fox-2-0-performance-series-ifp-shock-chevy-gmc.aspx#.VbGNB5_D_qD

 

Rear shocks

 

The reason I looked at Fox shocks was bc I have never heard anything bad about Fox. I'm sure there are some negative comments on Fox, but I haven't heard any

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Posted

 

I agree that the stock Ranchos aren't great. I was just worried that I'd be "overdoing" it by going to an expensive Fox Coil Over considering I almost never leave the pavement.

 

It's hard to over-do it with suspension components--there really are gains to be had with better stuff. Fox is good stuff, but for a pavement rig their strongest attributes are sort of going to go to waste. Another option that might suite you a bit better is ICON. I'd recommend this for you: http://performancetruckproducts.com/k73001-icon-2007-current-silverado-sierra-1500-suspension-system-stage-1 . You will not believe the ride and handling. If you went offroad more I'd recommend the extended travel coilovers combined with new upper arms (for either Fox or ICON) for more travel.

Posted

Better than Bilstein 5100's..... Yes

Better than Bilstein 6112..... Debatable

I say coil over shocks are the way to go vs bilstein 5100 adjustable shocks.

 

Coil over shocks will absorb any bump better than just a piston style shock. Coil overs have piston and springs.

 

If you haven't lifted or leveled your truck, you wouldn't understand the difference in ride. Where the difference is very little, the stock shocks are junk.

 

Also, having shocks that lift your truck will keep a better angle on ball joints vs a level kit. Preventing premature wear on parts. ( debatable)

 

And if you have a aluminum control arm they will be silver, steel ones are black

 

How is the stock setup or the bilstein setup different than a coilover? Aren't they all coilover configurations?

Posted

 

How is the stock setup or the bilstein setup different than a coilover? Aren't they all coilover configurations?

Im not exactly sure how they differ, but I know a coil over has the reservoir on the top. OEM setup has the reservoir on the bottom.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...